In this study, we examined a group of four teachers who completed extra educational technology coursework and field experiences during their teacher education programs to determine how their technology integration knowledge, self-efficacy beliefs, intentions, and practices evolved over time. We conducted interviews and evaluated data sources at three intervals: (1) after teacher education coursework was completed, (2) after student teaching was completed, and (3) after two initial years of teaching. Results showed that school resources and environment had a strong impact on beginning teachers' practices, regardless of strong internal enabling factors.
This study was undertaken to address an issue of student retention and learning in undergraduate computer science (CS) courses. To improve students’ CS learning experience, the goal of this case study was to support five CS faculty’s integration of active learning into their teaching, using the Understanding by Design framework. We explored the CS faculty’s considerations and experiences with active learning integration. The data included video conferencing recordings, syllabi data analysis, teacher interviews, and a focus group. The results showed that CS faculty considered three aspects in their active learning integration: (a) course structure and delivery format, (b) instructional approaches, and (c) authentic learning experiences for students. The CS faculty’s primary challenge was ways to assess individual students’ knowledge gained in team-based activities. We found a gradual adaptation of active learning in CS faculty’s teaching practices and recognized that their development and change in pedagogies need time and personalized support.
8 September 2020 in Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
This multiple case study describes a year-long implementation of a research-based coaching model designed to support changes in elementary teachers’ technology integration practices. We examined coaches’ perceptions of the model through the use of coaches’ questionnaires, reflection notes, and meeting notes. Teachers’ coaching experiences were also examined through end-of-year interviews. We identified successes (relationships with teachers, ability to provide personalized support, and teacher change) and challenges (time, technology difficulties, relationships, and collaboration challenges). The primary lessons learned from the coaches’ experiences with the research-based PD focused on (1) the impact of personalized support, (2) the relationships between teachers and coaches, and (3) development of the coaches’ knowledge.