Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a complex clinical syndrome that encompasses acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina (UA). Its underlying mechanism refers to coronary plaque disruption, with consequent platelet aggregation and thrombosis. Inflammation plays an important role in the progression of atherosclerosis by mediating the removal of necrotic tissue following myocardial infarction and shaping the repair processes that are essential for the recovery process after ACS. As a chronic inflammatory disorder, atherosclerosis is characterized by dysfunctional immune inflammation involving interactions between immune (macrophages, T lymphocytes, and monocytes) and vascular cells (endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells). New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is one of the most common arrhythmic complications in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, especially in the early stages, when the myocardial inflammatory reaction is at its maximum. The main changes in the atrial substrate are due to atrial ischemia and acute infarcts that can be attributed to neurohormonal factors. The high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) post-myocardial infarction may be secondary to inflammation. Inflammatory response and immune system cells have been involved in the initiation and development of atrial fibrillation. Several inflammatory indexes, such as C-reactive protein and interleukins, have been demonstrated to be predictive of prognosis in patients with ACS. The cell signaling activation patterns associated with fibrosis, apoptosis, and hypertrophy are forms of cardiac remodeling that occur at the atrial level, predisposing to AF. According to a recent study, the presence of fibrosis and lymphomononuclear infiltration in the atrial tissue was associated with a prior history of AF. However, inflammation may contribute to both the occurrence/maintenance of AF and its thromboembolic complications.

Radial artery spasm (RAS) is a common complication associated with transradial access (TRA) for coronary interventions, particularly affecting elderly patients in whom radial access is preferred due to its benefits in reducing bleeding complications, improving clinical outcomes, and lowering long-term costs. This review examines the incidence, prevention, and treatment of RAS. Methods included an online search of PubMed and other databases in early 2024, analyzing meta-analyses, reviews, studies, and case reports. RAS is characterized by a sudden narrowing of the radial artery due to psychological and mechanical factors with incidence reports varying up to 51.3%. Key risk factors include patient characteristics like female sex, age, and small body size as well as procedural factors such as emergency procedures and the use of multiple catheters. Preventive measures include using distal radial access, hydrophilic sheaths, and appropriate catheter sizes. Treatments involve the intraarterial administration of nitroglycerine and verapamil as well as mechanical methods like balloon-assisted tracking. This review underscores the need for standardizing RAS definitions and emphasizes the importance of operator experience and patient management in reducing RAS incidence and improving procedural success.

This review aims to summarize the global prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in patients with acute heart failure who have been admitted to coronary care units, highlighting the underrepresented burden of infection in this high-risk population. Coronary care units (CCUs) play a pivotal role in the care of patients experiencing acute or decompensated heart failure, offering a highly monitored environment with immediate access to advanced cardiac interventions. The management of heart failure in CCUs involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes hemodynamic monitoring, pharmacologic therapy, respiratory support, and, in selected cases, mechanical circulatory assistance. The early identification of deterioration, rapid therapeutic escalation, and close monitoring of cardiac function are hallmarks of CCU care. However, the complexity and severity of illness in this population are compounded by a high risk of infections, including hospital-acquired pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and device-related infections. These infections not only increase morbidity and prolong hospitalization but also significantly impact mortality and healthcare costs. The immunocompromised state of many heart failure patients—due to poor perfusion, malnutrition, and the use of invasive devices—further elevates their vulnerability. Effective infection prevention, early diagnosis, and targeted antimicrobial therapy are, therefore, critical components of heart failure management within CCUs. This intersection of advanced cardiac care and infection control highlights the need for integrated, multidisciplinary strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Congenital heart diseases (CHD) are one of the most common birth defects and the main leading cause of death in children. Many patients with CHD are reaching adulthood due to the success of improved contemporary surgical procedures. Understanding the etiology of CHD remains important for patient clinical management. Both genetic and environmental factors are involved in the development and progression of CHD. Variations in many different genes and chromosomal anomalies can be associated with CHD, by expression of different mechanisms. Sporadic cases are the most frequently encountered in these patients. Atrial septal defect is a common congenital heart disease that refers to direct communication between atrial chambers, found isolated or associated with other syndromes. Imaging techniques, especially transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) represent the key for diagnosis and management of ASD. The disease has a major incidence in adulthood, due to late symptomatology, but assessment and treatment are important to avoid time-related complications. Ebstein’s anomaly is a rare congenital disease, with a dominant genetic participation, characterized by an abnormal displacement of the tricuspid valve and right ventricular myopathy, often requiring surgical intervention. Alongside echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard tool for the assessment of ventricular volumes. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are mandatory to avoid possible complications of CHD, and thus, ECG, as well as imaging techniques, are important diagnostic tools. However, patients with CHD need a special healthcare team for the entire monitorization in various life stages.

Background: The role of digoxin in atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with heart failure, has long been debated. Observational studies reporting higher mortality have fueled skepticism, yet growing evidence suggests that these findings largely reflect prescription bias, confounding by indication, and inadequate adjustment for serum-level rather than intrinsic toxicity. Objective: To reassess digoxin’s role in atrial fibrillation with heart failure using contemporary evidence and to propose a physiology-based, personalized monitoring framework. Evidence review: We reevaluated the studies that initially linked digoxin to excess mortality and reassessed these associations through three analytic pillars: randomized evidence, bias deconstruction, and exposure–response relationships. Across datasets, low serum digoxin concentrations were consistently associated with stable resting rate control without increasing mortality. Key findings: Low-dose, continuously administered digoxin is a viable second-line option for atrial fibrillation rate control in patients who are hypotensive or intolerant of β-blockers. Safety is concentration-dependent; adverse outcomes increase at higher serum digoxin concentration (≥1.2 ng/mL). Resting heart rate can serve as a contextual surrogate of exposure: persistent HR > 100 bpm in stable patients usually reflects underexposure rather than digoxin toxicity, whereas bradycardia should prompt immediate serum digoxin concentration testing. Proposal: A probability-based monitoring model that integrates heart rate, renal function, dosage, electrolytes, and drug–drug interactions to guide when serum digoxin concentration measurement is warranted. As a future direction, a supervised “pill-in-the-pocket” supplemental dose strategy could be evaluated for transient tachycardia in selected, stable patients. Conclusions: When properly dosed and contextually monitored, digoxin remains a safe, effective, and individualized rate-control option in atrial fibrillation with heart failure. Prospective validation of probability-guided monitoring and evaluation of a “pill-in-the-pocket” approach could simplify digoxin management while maintaining safety.

Background and Objectives: Radial artery spasm (RAS) is a frequent complication during invasive angiography using the transradial approach, leading to patient discomfort and procedural challenges. While intra-arterial nitroglycerine (NTG) effectively reduces RAS after sheath insertion, preprocedural prevention strategies are limited. This study evaluates the efficacy of topical NTG in improving radial artery puncture success and reducing RAS incidence. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind single-center study 100 patients undergoing angiography were pretreated with either topical NTG or placebo. Outcomes assessed included RAS incidence, radial artery puncture success, number of attempts, procedural duration, patient discomfort, and complications. RAS was evaluated angiographically and clinically, with additional subgroup analyses for diabetic and smoking patients. Results: Topical NTG significantly reduced RAS incidence (53.2% vs. 73.6%; p = 0.0349) and increased radial puncture success on the first attempt (89.4% vs. 77.4%; p = 0.0488). Diabetic patients particularly benefited from NTG application, with lower RAS rates (36.4% vs. 76.2%; p = 0.0296). No significant differences were observed in procedural duration, patient discomfort, or complication rates between groups. The placebo group demonstrated a higher incidence of diffuse RAS (p = 0.0109). Conclusions: Preprocedural topical NTG application is a safe, non-invasive intervention that improves radial artery access success and reduces RAS, especially in high-risk subgroups such as diabetics. These findings support its potential as a procedural optimization tool in cardiovascular interventions, particularly in patients with heart failure, who often require repeated and reliable vascular access.