Resumo Este estudo objetivou analisar a associação entre multimorbidade e depressão e qualidade de vida em idosos da Estratégia de Saúde da Família (ESF), por meio de estudo transversal com cadastrados na ESF de Senador Guiomard, Acre. Utilizou-se a Escala de Depressão Geriátrica (EDG-15) e o Questionário de Qualidade de Vida (WHOQOL-Bref). As diferenças das variáveis descritivas por idosos com e sem multimorbidade foram estimadas pelo teste qui-quadrado de Pearson e as associações entre multimorbidade e depressão e qualidade de vida foram estimadas com técnica de regressão logística. Observou-se que idosos com depressão representaram 27% da amostra, sendo essa doença em maior proporção entre os com multimorbidade em comparação àqueles sem. Os idosos com multimorbidade tiveram duas vezes mais chance de apresentar depressão. Similarmente, os indivíduos com multimorbidade tiveram maior chance de pior qualidade de vida total e nos domínios físico, psicológicos, social (todos com p ≤ 0,010), exceto no domínio ambiental (p = 0,493). Assim, a multimorbidade em idosos está associada à presença de depressão e pior qualidade de vida, impondo à ESF o desafio de garantir a essa população viver a senescência sem sofrimento e redução da qualidade de vida.

Resumo Objetivo: Analisar fatores de risco para óbito em indivíduos com síndrome respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva, constituída de indivíduos adultos com COVID-19, de março a setembro de 2020, notificados pelo sistema de vigilância epidemiológica do estado do Acre, Brasil. Empregou-se regressão de Cox. Resultados: Entre 57.700 indivíduos analisados, a incidência foi de 2.765,4/100 mil habitantes, e a mortalidade, de 61,8/100 mil hab. Os fatores de risco para o óbito foram ser do sexo masculino (HR=1,48 - IC95% 1,25;1,76), ter idade ≥60 anos (HR=10,64 - IC95% 8,84;12,81), sintoma de dispneia (HR=4,20 - IC95% 3,44;5,12) e apresentar multimorbidade (HR=2,23 - IC95% 1,77;2,81), com destaque para cardiopatas e diabetes mellitus. Os sintomas ‘dor de garganta’ e ‘cefaleia’ estavam presentes nos casos leves da doença. Conclusão: Ser homem, idoso, apresentar cardiopatia, diabetes mellitus e dispneia foram características associadas ao óbito pela COVID-19.

Objective: To identify the prevalence of adverse events and the critically ill patient’s need for care in an intensive care unit. Method: This is a cross-sectional study, carried out from January to March 2020. The adverse events investigated were pressure injury, accidental orotracheal extubation, fall, loss of central venous access, and healthcare-associated infection. The number of hours required for patient care was measured by the Nursing Activities Score. The categorical independent variables were described by absolute and relative frequencies, and the continuous ones, by central tendency. The magnitude measure was the odds ratio and a confidence interval of 95% was considered. Results: of the 88 patients evaluated, 52.3% had adverse events, which were associated with a greater need for care, severity, and longer hospital stay. The mean Nursing Activities Score was 51.01% (12 h 24 min), with a deficit of 20% to 30% of nursing staff in the unit being identified. Conclusion: The prevalence of adverse events in the unit is high and the shortage of nursing staff in the unit revealed the need for adequate staffing to reduce the damage caused by the care provided to critically ill patients.

Objective: to relate nursing diagnoses/outcomes and interventions for critically ill patients affected by COVID-19 and sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit, according to the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®). Method: a documentary study conducted in March and April 2020 from the ICNP® terminology subset for adult patients with sepsis. The documentary corpus was composed of the list of nursing diagnoses/outcomes and interventions based on Horta's Theory of Basic Human Needs; on the 7-Axis Model of the International Classification for Nursing Practice, version 2017; on the Pathophysiological model of sepsis; as well as relying on the authors' expertise in direct care for suspected or confirmed critically ill patients affected by COVID-19. Outcomes: a total of 58 nursing diagnoses/outcomes were identified that belong to the psychobiological needs of oxygenation (13-22.4%), vascular regulation (12-20.7%), neurological regulation (10-17.2%), hydration (08-13.8%), elimination (08-13.8%), immunological regulation (04-6.9%) and thermal regulation (03-5.2%), evidencing a total of 172 nursing interventions with a mean of 03 for each nursing diagnosis/outcome. Conclusion: data analysis provided greater knowledge about the disease and the nursing process in the ICU setting, serving as a guide for the professional practice for critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and sepsis.

Objective: To identify clinical indicators and nursing diagnoses with the highest risk of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method: Retrospective cohort with the population of adults and elderly people with COVID-19 from an Intensive Care Unit. Categorical variables were described using absolute and relative frequencies and risk factors for mortality using Cox regression, with a confidence interval of 95%. Results: The main clinical indicators of COVID-19 patients were dyspnea, fever, fatigue, cough, among others, and the Nursing Diagnoses at higher risk of mortality were Ineffective protection, Ineffective tissue perfusion, Contamination, Ineffective Breathing Pattern, Impaired spontaneous ventilation, Acute confusion, Frailty syndrome, Obesity, and Decreased cardiac output. It is worth mentioning that there was little information about the diagnoses of Domains 9, 10, and 12. Conclusion: This research infers the need to monitor the clinical indicators dyspnea, fever, fatigue, cough, among others, and the Nursing Diagnoses with the highest risk of mortality Ineffective protection, Ineffective tissue perfusion, Contamination, Ineffective Breathing Pattern, Impaired spontaneous ventilation in critically ill patients.

Objective: to report the professional experience of a nurse manager facing the challenges of restructuring a hospital service in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: this is an experience report, based on the perspective of system resilience in a public hospital. Results: the challenges faced were: internal service flow reorganization to assist suspected cases of COVID-19; institution of structural changes and adaptations, from entry into the emergency room to the wards and intensive care unit; equipment and supply acquisition for patient care with a focus on their quality and functionality; staff training, with the restructuring of work processes; staff sizing, considering the time of exposure to the virus; staff’s professional qualification, absenteeism, stress, physical and psychological illness, with a view to safe and quality care; nursing staff leadership to deal with conflicts generated by professionals’ stress and illness. Conclusion: healthcare service resilience is critical for hospital restructuring in the COVID-19 pandemic; however, patient care and healthcare professionals’ physical and mental health must be considered.