Objective: to analyze in the scientific literature the evidence on nasogastric/nasoenteric tube related adverse events in adult patients. Method: integrative literature review through the search of publications in journals indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, EMBASE and Scopus, and hand searching, was undertaken up to April 2017. Results: the sample consisted of 69 primary studies, mainly in English and published in the USA and UK. They were divided in two main categories and subcategories: the first category refers to Mechanical Adverse Events (respiratory complications; esophageal or pharyngeal complications; tube obstruction; intestinal perforation; intracranial perforation and unplanned tube removal) and the second alludes to Others (pressure injury related to fixation and misconnections). Death was reported in 16 articles. Conclusion: nasogastric/nasoenteric tube related adverse events are relatively common and the majority involved respiratory harm that resulted in increased hospitalization and/or death. The results may contribute to healthcare professionals, especially nurses, to develop an evidence-based guideline for insertion and correct positioning of bedside enteral tubes in adult patients.

Objective: to analyze the immunization errors reported in an online Information System. Method: retrospective study conducted with data from the Adverse Event Following Immunization Surveillance Information System. Immunization errors were analyzed with respect to demographic characteristics and the vaccination process. Frequencies and error incidence rates have been calculated. Binomial and chi-square tests were used to verify differences in the proportions of the variables. Results: 501 errors were analyzed, the majority involving routine doses (92.6%), without Adverse Event Following Immunization (90.6%) and in children under five years old (55.7%). The most frequent types of errors were inadequacy in the indication of the immunobiological (26.9%), inadequate interval between doses (18.2%) and error in the administration technique (14.2%). The overall error incidence rate was 4.05/100,000 doses applied; the highest incidences of routine vaccines were for human rabies vaccine, human papillomavirus and triple viral; the incidence rate of errors with Adverse Events Following Immunization was 0.45/100,000 doses applied. Conclusion: it was found that immunization errors are a reality to be faced by the health systems, but they are amenable to prevention through interventions such as the adoption of protocols, checklists and permanent education in health.

Resumo Objetivo: Analisar fatores de risco para óbito em indivíduos com síndrome respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva, constituída de indivíduos adultos com COVID-19, de março a setembro de 2020, notificados pelo sistema de vigilância epidemiológica do estado do Acre, Brasil. Empregou-se regressão de Cox. Resultados: Entre 57.700 indivíduos analisados, a incidência foi de 2.765,4/100 mil habitantes, e a mortalidade, de 61,8/100 mil hab. Os fatores de risco para o óbito foram ser do sexo masculino (HR=1,48 - IC95% 1,25;1,76), ter idade ≥60 anos (HR=10,64 - IC95% 8,84;12,81), sintoma de dispneia (HR=4,20 - IC95% 3,44;5,12) e apresentar multimorbidade (HR=2,23 - IC95% 1,77;2,81), com destaque para cardiopatas e diabetes mellitus. Os sintomas ‘dor de garganta’ e ‘cefaleia’ estavam presentes nos casos leves da doença. Conclusão: Ser homem, idoso, apresentar cardiopatia, diabetes mellitus e dispneia foram características associadas ao óbito pela COVID-19.

Objective: To identify the prevalence of adverse events and the critically ill patient’s need for care in an intensive care unit. Method: This is a cross-sectional study, carried out from January to March 2020. The adverse events investigated were pressure injury, accidental orotracheal extubation, fall, loss of central venous access, and healthcare-associated infection. The number of hours required for patient care was measured by the Nursing Activities Score. The categorical independent variables were described by absolute and relative frequencies, and the continuous ones, by central tendency. The magnitude measure was the odds ratio and a confidence interval of 95% was considered. Results: of the 88 patients evaluated, 52.3% had adverse events, which were associated with a greater need for care, severity, and longer hospital stay. The mean Nursing Activities Score was 51.01% (12 h 24 min), with a deficit of 20% to 30% of nursing staff in the unit being identified. Conclusion: The prevalence of adverse events in the unit is high and the shortage of nursing staff in the unit revealed the need for adequate staffing to reduce the damage caused by the care provided to critically ill patients.