Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Cryoablation is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with a small renal mass (SRM). We aimed to present the long-term functional and oncologic outcomes of cryoablation for SRMs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with percutaneous or laparoscopic cryoablation for an SRM (≤4 cm in diameter) at our tertiary hospital between October 2001 and December 2011. Primary outcomes included technical failure (persistent CT enhancement post-ablation) and progression (local recurrence or metastasis). Trifecta is defined as the absence of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo > 2), no oncological progression, and ≤10% decline in eGFR. Results: A total of 129 patients with a median age of 67 (IQR 58–74) years were analyzed. The median (IQR) clinical and radiologic follow-ups across all patients were 136 (54–180) and 74 (23–147) months, respectively, with a median (IQR) tumor volume of 3.3 (1.6–6.6) cm³. Among those with available biopsy data (n = 86), 62 (72%) were diagnosed with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), and 24 (28%) exhibited benign pathologies, including angiomyolipoma, oncocytic neoplasm, and non-diagnostic pathology. Of all patients, six experienced high-grade complications. Among non-solitary kidney patients with available creatinine values between 13 and 36 months post-treatment, 64% had ≤10% eGFR decline compared to baseline. Notably, 58% (26/48) of patients with RCC (non-solitary kidney) achieved our trifecta definition at 36 months. Metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival at 15-year follow-up were 85%, 96%, and 46%, respectively. Univariable regression identified tumor volume and solitary kidney status at ablation as significant predictors for oncological progression. Conclusions: Cryoablation for the SRM showed sustained oncological and functional efficacy over long-term follow-up.

Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study compared the costs and charges of primary treatment options for localized PCa at Duke University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. Case identification was carried out by querying the relevant disease, procedural, and charge codes from Duke Finance. Consecutive cases with NCCN high-risk disease, prior treatment, or missing institutional financial information were excluded. Costs were calculated from the point at which the treatment option was selected until the last treatment session (SBRT and IMRT) or hospital discharge (other modalities). All modalities except RRP were considered technology-intensive. Results: A total of 552 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years met the inclusion criteria. NCCN risk categories included 85 (13%) low, 218 (41%) favorable-intermediate, and 249 (46%) unfavorable-intermediate risk cases. RALP, RRP, Cryo, and HIFU were single-session treatments, whereas IMRT, SBRT, and LDBT were delivered over multiple sessions. IMRT and SBRT were the most expensive modalities, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of sessions (ρ=0.55, p<0.001) and being technology-intensive (ρ=0.58, p<0.001) were significantly correlated with treatment costs. Conclusions: In this cohort of PCa patients, treatment costs were highest for IMRT and SBRT, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of treatment sessions significantly correlated with increased costs.

Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study compared the costs and charges of primary treatment options for localized PCa at Duke University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified cases by querying the relevant disease, procedural, and charge codes from Duke Finance. Consecutive cases with NCCN high-risk disease, prior treatment, or missing institutional financial information were excluded. Costs were calculated from the point at which the treatment option was selected until the last treatment session (SBRT and IMRT) or hospital discharge (other modalities). All modalities except RRP were considered technology-intensive. Results: A total of 552 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years met the inclusion criteria. NCCN risk categories included 85 (13%) low, 218 (41%) favorable-intermediate, and 249 (46%) unfavorable-intermediate risk cases. RALP, RRP, Cryo, and HIFU were single-session treatments, whereas IMRT, SBRT, and LDBT were delivered over multiple sessions. IMRT and SBRT were the most expensive modalities, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of sessions (ρ = 0.55, p < 0.001) and being technology-intensive (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with treatment costs. Conclusions: In this cohort of PCa patients, treatment costs were highest for IMRT and SBRT, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of treatment sessions was a significant predictor of higher costs.