The growing adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) within the architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) sector raises questions about the quality of BIM data deliverables for project owners. Therefore, assessment and evaluation of such BIM data against relevant documents such as the BIM Execution Plan (BEP), the Level of Definition (LOD)/Level of Information (LOI) matrix, and quality control customized checklists become critical, especially in large construction projects. This study primarily aims to create an automated system for assessing the quality of 3D BIM model data, utilizing a proposed project quality control checklist. The automated system consists of four key elements: a BIM-based model, a Data Extraction and Analysis Module, a Data Storage Module, and a Data Visualization Module. The Data Extraction and Analysis Module extracts relevant information and parameters from BIM models to evaluate their quality against predefined checklists. Then, it transfers the information and stores the results in a database. The database is connected to an engineering project collaboration tool, ProjectWise, to automatically update and store the data in the cloud. The database is then connected to an interactive data visualization platform, Power BI, to enable automatic visualization of the generated quality assessment results of the BIM models’ data. This system was applied to a Canadian infrastructure construction project by its BIM department during the preliminary and detailed design phases. It demonstrated an average quality score (AQS) of 87.6% for the BIM models and significantly reduced failing items by around 30%. This study concludes that the system offers a robust, practical solution for enhancing the quality control process in BIM model data management, thereby aiding engineers in timely model adjustments to meet project requirements.

Accurate quantity takeoff (QTO) is essential for cost estimation and project planning in the construction industry. However, current practices are often fragmented and rely on manual or semi-automated processes, leading to inefficiencies and errors. This study introduces a cloud-based framework that integrates automated QTO with a rule-based Quantity Precision Check (QPC) to ensure that quantities are derived only from validated and consistent BIM data. The framework is designed to be scalable and compatible with open data standards, supporting collaboration across teams and disciplines. A case study demonstrates the implementation of the system using structural and architectural models, where automated validation detected parameter inconsistencies and significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of takeoff results. To evaluate the system’s effectiveness, the study proposes five quantitative validation metrics, Inconsistency Detection Rate (IDR), Parameter Consistency Rate (PCR), Quantity Accuracy Improvement (QAI), Change Impact Tracking (CIT), and Automated Reporting Efficiency (ARE). These indicators are newly introduced in this study to address the absence of standardized metrics for automated QTO with pre-takeoff, rule-based validation. However, the current validation was limited to a single project and discipline-specific rule set, suggesting that broader testing across mechanical, electrical, and infrastructure models is needed to fully confirm scalability and generalizability. The proposed approach provides both researchers and practitioners with a replicable, transparent methodology for advancing digital construction practices and improving the quality and efficiency of BIM-based estimation processes.

Lean Construction and digital tools such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), common data environments (CDEs), and mobile applications are widely adopted in construction projects but are often implemented through parallel and disconnected workflows. Consequently, Lean production control continues to rely heavily on manual observations, meetings, and spreadsheets, while increasing volumes of digital project data remain underutilized for operational decision-making. This disconnect limits project teams’ ability to detect waste early, stabilize production flow, and learn systematically from recurring issues. This study develops a conceptual Digital Lean Construction (DLC) framework using a design-oriented methodology comprising three stages: synthesis of gaps in existing BIM–Lean integration research, examination of previously validated digital workflows for BIM Quality Control (QC), Quantity Takeoff (QTO), and digital twin monitoring, and integration of these components into a unified closed-loop architecture. The resulting framework organizes project information through four conceptual layers and six implementation components that connect BIM/Industry Foundation Classes (IFC4 × 3) models, schedules, issue and quality records, quantity data, field inputs, sensor information, and GIS-based spatial context. The framework assumes IFC4 × 3 because it provides enhanced support for infrastructure assets and linear referencing required for transportation and civil infrastructure projects. Rule-based analytical logic is formalized for seven Lean key performance indicators (KPIs): Percent Plan Complete (PPC), takt deviations, constraint age, rework cycles, waste event counts, QC status, and delay risk. The framework demonstrates how validated and location-aware project information can be transformed into actionable Lean performance intelligence and incorporated into weekly planning, daily huddles, problem-solving, and standardization routines. Several underlying data-generation components have been validated in previous studies; however, the integrated DLC framework itself remains conceptual and requires project-level empirical evaluation. As a conceptual framework grounded in prior literature and previously validated digital workflows, this study does not include empirical field validation. Instead, it proposes an operational architecture intended to guide future implementation and evaluation in real construction projects. The study contributes an implementable architectural foundation for moving from fragmented, retrospective reporting toward proactive, data-supported, and continuously improving production control.