Ming Zhao

Ming Zhao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 June 2016 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vineet Singh SikarwarVineet Singh Sikarwar
Vineet Singh Sikarwar
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
Peter CloughPeter Clough
Peter Clough
JYJoseph Yao
Joseph Yao
XZXia Zhong
Xia Zhong
PFP. Fennell
P. Fennell
Biomass gasification is a widely used thermochemical process for obtaining products with more value and potential applications than the raw material itself. Cutting-edge, innovative and economical gasification techniques with high efficiencies are a prerequisite for the development of this technology. This paper delivers an assessment on the fundamentals such as feedstock types, the impact of different operating parameters, tar formation and cracking, and modelling approaches for biomass gasification. Furthermore, the authors comparatively discuss various conventional mechanisms for gasification as well as recent advances in biomass gasification. Unique gasifiers along with multi-generation strategies are discussed as a means to promote this technology into alternative applications, which require higher flexibility and greater efficiency. A strategy to improve the feasibility and sustainability of biomass gasification is via technological advancement and the minimization of socio-environmental effects. This paper sheds light on diverse areas of biomass gasification as a potentially sustainable and environmentally friendly technology.

1 April 2018 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAbdul Raheem
Abdul Raheem
Vineet Singh SikarwarVineet Singh Sikarwar
Vineet Singh Sikarwar
Jun HeJun He
Jun He
WDWafa Dastyar
Wafa Dastyar
Dionysios (Dion) DionysiouDionysios (Dion) Dionysiou
Dionysios (Dion) Dionysiou
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao

19 May 2017 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXiao Zhao
Xiao Zhao
Hui ZhouHui Zhou
Hui Zhou
Vineet Singh SikarwarVineet Singh Sikarwar
Vineet Singh Sikarwar
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
APAh-Hyung A. Park
Ah-Hyung A. Park
LFLiang-Shih Fan
Liang-Shih Fan
Biomass is a promising renewable energy resource despite its low energy density, high moisture content and complex ash components. The use of biomass in energy production is considered to be approximately carbon neutral, and if it is combined with carbon capture technology, the overall energy conversion may even be negative in terms of net CO2 emission, which is known as BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage). The initial development of BECCS technologies often proposes the installation of a CO2 capture unit downstream of the conventional thermochemical conversion processes, which comprise combustion, pyrolysis or gasification. Although these approaches would benefit from the adaptation of already well developed energy conversion processes and CO2 capture technologies, they are limited in terms of materials and energy integration as well as systems engineering, which could lead to truly disruptive technologies for BECCS. Recently, a new generation of transformative energy conversion technologies including chemical looping have been developed. In particular, chemical looping employs solid looping materials and it uniquely allows inherent capture of CO2 during the conversion of fuels. In this review, the benefits, challenges, and prospects of biomass-based chemical looping technologies in various configurations have been discussed in-depth to provide important insight into the development of innovative BECCS technologies based on chemical looping.

20 December 2021 in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYutao Zhang
Yutao Zhang
ZFZegang Fu
Zegang Fu
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
GJGuozhao Ji
Guozhao Ji
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
ALAimin Li
Aimin Li

1 January 2013 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
AMAndrew I. Minett
Andrew I. Minett
AHAndrew T. Harris
Andrew T. Harris
In this paper, we compare and contrast the four most promising (i.e. commercially viable in the near future) technologies for the post-combustion capture (PCC) of CO2 that can be retrofitted to a conventional pulverised-coal power plant. These are CO2 capture using: (i) chilled ammonia, (ii) alkali-metal carbonates, (iii) membranes and (iv) calcium looping. These four technologies are compared to the benchmark monoethanolamine (MEA) scrubbing process in terms of efficiency penalty and cost indicators. We first review the relevant CO2 capture chemistry and typical process flow schematics, and then discuss energy- and mass-balance considerations. We consider 18 published techno-economic studies on these technologies and highlight the key measures, including net CO2 capture rate, net power output, net plant efficiency, capital costs, cost of electricity and cost of CO2 avoided. Calcium looping technology results in the lowest efficiency penalty (4.6%-points) and cost of PCC (36.3% increase in levelised cost of electricity). In addition, the cost of CO2 avoided by employing calcium looping for PCC can be as low as 29 USD2010 per tCO2. On all three of these criteria, calcium looping performs more than twice as well as the benchmark MEA PCC process.

24 July 2018 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Guozhao JiGuozhao Ji
Guozhao Ji
JYJoseph G. Yao
Joseph G. Yao
Peter CloughPeter Clough
Peter Clough
JCJoão C. Diniz da Costa
João C. Diniz da Costa
Edward AnthonyEdward Anthony
Edward Anthony
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
This paper reviews the advances of enhanced thermo-chemical processes applying H 2 -selective membrane reactors and in situ CO 2 capture for selective H 2 production.