Purpose: To evaluate the utility and comparative effectiveness of three five-point qualitative scoring systems for assessing response on PET-CT and MRI imaging individually and in combination, following curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Their performance in the prediction of subsequent patient outcomes was also assessed; Methods: Ninety-seven patients with histologically confirmed LACC treated with CRT using standard institutional protocols at a single centre who underwent PET-CT and MRI at staging and post treatment were identified retrospectively from an institutional database. The post-CRT imaging studies were independently reviewed, and response assessed using five-point scoring tools for T2WI, DWI, and FDG PET-CT. Patient characteristics, staging, treatment, and follow-up details including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collected. To compare diagnostic performance metrics, a two-proportion z-test was employed. A Kaplan–Meier analysis (Mantel–Cox log-rank) was performed. Results: The T2WI (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00001) and DWI response scores (p < 0.00001, p = 0.0002) had higher specificity and accuracy than the PET-CT. The T2WI score had the highest positive predictive value (PPV), while the negative predictive value (NPV) was consistent across modalities. The combined MR scores maintained high NPV, PPV, specificity, and sensitivity, and the PET/MR consensus scores showed superior diagnostic accuracy and specificity compared to the PET-CT score alone (p = 0.02926, p = 0.0083). The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the PFS based on the T2WI (p < 0.001), DWI (p < 0.001), combined MR (p = 0.003), and PET-CT/MR consensus scores (p < 0.001) and in the OS for the T2WI (p < 0.001), DWI (p < 0.001), and combined MR scores (p = 0.031) between responders and non-responders. Conclusion: Post-CRT response assessment using qualitative MR scoring and/or consensus PET-CT and MRI scoring was a better predictor of outcome compared to PET-CT assessment alone. This requires validation in a larger prospective study but offers the potential to help stratify patient follow-up in the future.

Objective (1): To develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model using radiomic features (RFs) extracted from [18F]FDG PET-CT to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate. Methods (2): This retrospective study included 98 internal and 55 external AAA patients undergoing [18F]FDG PET-CT. RFs were extracted from manual segmentations of AAAs using PyRadiomics. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) reduced features for model optimisation. A multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was developed for AAA growth prediction and compared against Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Accuracy was evaluated via cross-validation, with uncertainty quantified using dropout (MLP), standard deviation (RF), and 95% prediction intervals (XGBoost). External validation used independent data from two centres. Ground truth growth rates were calculated from serial ultrasound (US) measurements or CT volumes. Results (3): From 93 initial RFs, 29 remained after RFE. The MLP model achieved an MAE ± SEM of 1.35 ± 3.2e−4 mm/year with the full feature set and 1.35 ± 2.5e−4 mm/year with RFE. External validation yielded 1.8 ± 8.9e−8 mm/year. RF, XGBoost, and SVM models produced comparable accuracies internally (1.4–1.5 mm/year) but showed higher errors during external validation (1.9–1.97 mm/year). The MLP model demonstrated reduced uncertainty with the full feature set across all datasets. Conclusions (4): An MLP model leveraging [18F]FDG PET-CT radiomics accurately predicted AAA growth rates and generalised well to external data. In the future, more sophisticated stratification could guide individualised patient care, facilitating risk-tailored management of AAAs.