Colorectal surgery is associated with the highest rate of surgical site infection (SSI). This study analyses the effectiveness of an interventional surveillance program on SSI rates after elective colorectal surgery. Cohort study showing temporal trends of SSI rates and Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) in elective colorectal surgery over a 12-year period. Prospectively collected data of a national SSI surveillance program was analysed and the effect of specific interventions was evaluated. Patient and procedure characteristics, as well as SIR and SSI rates were stratified by risk categories and type of SSI analysed using stepwise multivariate logistic regression models. In a cohort of 42,330 operations, overall cumulative SSI incidence was 16.31%, and organ-space SSI (O/S-SSI) was 8.59%. There was a 61.63% relative decrease in SSI rates (rho = -0.95804). The intervention which achieved the greatest SSI reduction was a bundle of 6 measures. SSI in pre-bundle period was 19.73% vs. 11.10% in post-bundle period (OR 1.969; IC 95% 1.860-2.085; p < 0.0001). O/S-SSI were 9.08% vs. 6.06%, respectively (OR 1.547; IC 95% 1.433-1.670; p < 0.0001). Median length of stay was 7 days, with a significant decrease over the studied period (rho = -0.98414). Mortality of the series was 1.08%, ranging from 0.35% to 2.0%, but a highly significant decrease was observed (rho = -0.67133). Detailed analysis of risk factors and postoperative infection in colorectal surgery allows strategies for reducing SSI incidence to be designed. An interventional surveillance program has been effective in decreasing SIR and SSI rates.

Background: Phlebitis related to peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) is a common complication in patients who require these devices and can have important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. The management and control of the PVC-associated complications is related to nursing competency. The present study aims to determine, at the national level in Spain, the consensus on the assessment, treatment, and follow-up of PVC-related phlebitis and the importance of the actions taken. Method: A three-round Delphi technique was used with clinical care nurses who are experts in the field of in-hospital intravenous treatment in Spain. For this, an online questionnaire was developed with three open-ended questions on the dimensions of phlebitis assessment, treatment, and follow-up. For the statistical analysis of the results, frequencies and percentages were used to determine consensus, and the measures of central tendency (mean, standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation) were used to rank importance. The coefficient of variation was set as acceptable at ≤30%. Results: The final sample was 27 expert nurses. At the conclusion of round 3, actions were ranked according to their importance, with six items included in the PVC-related phlebitis assessment (symptomatology/observation, redness, the Maddox scale, induration, temperature, and pain), two in treatment (catheter removal, pentosan polysulphate sodium ointment + application of cold), and just one in follow-up (general monitoring + temperature control). Conclusions: There is a major disparity in relation to the PVC-related phlebitis assessment, treatment, and follow-up actions. More clinical studies are therefore needed to minimise the complications associated with the use of PVCs, given their impact on the quality of care and patient safety and their economic cost.