A pre-hydrated thermosensitive collagenated biomaterial which sets at body temperature and maintains the space of the missing alveolar bone volume, OsteoBiol GTO^® (GTO), has been released as a bone substitute. This study was designed to check its angiogenic and osteogenic potentials compared to OsteoBiol Gen-Os^® (Gen-Os) and Geistlich Bio-Oss^® (Bio-Oss). Samples of materials were incubated in culture media to obtain the extracts. Collagen release was measured in the extracts, which were used to investigate human periodontal ligament (hPDL) cell proliferation (MTT), colonization (Scratch assays) and growth factor release (ELISA). The effects on endothelial cell proliferation (MTT) and organization (Matrigel^® assays) were also studied. Finally, endothelial and mesenchymal Stem Cell (hMSC) recruitment (Boyden Chambers) were investigated, and hMSC Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured. A higher collagen concentration was found in GTO extract, which led to significantly higher hPDL cell proliferation/colonization. All materials increased VEGF/FGF-2 growth factor secretion, endothelial cell recruitment, proliferation, and organization, but the increase was highest with GTO. All materials increased hMSC recruitment and ALP activity. However, the increase was highest with collagenated GTO and Gen-Os, which enhanced C5a and BMP-2 secretion. Overall, GTO has higher angiogenic/osteogenic potentials than the collagenated Gen-Os and the anorganic Bio-Oss. It provides a suitable scaffold for endothelial and mesenchymal stem cell recruitment, which represent essential bone regeneration requirements.

Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reliable technique used in vertical and horizontal bone defects. The posterior mandibular region is an area limited by anatomic constraints. The use of resorbable membranes with a cortical component could compensate for the lack of rigidity of resorbable membranes without the complications of non-resorbable membranes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mean bone gains of a xenogeneic cortical membrane in horizontal and vertical bone defects in comparison with other membranes in the literature. Methods: A porcine cortical membrane was used to perform 7 GBR in the posterior mandibular region of five patients. Preoperative (T0) and six months postoperative (T1) cone beam computed tomography were superimposed to measure the horizontal and vertical bone gain. Implants were positioned at all sites, six months after GBR. Complications and bone resorption around the implants were also documented. Results: The mean horizontal and vertical bone gains were 3.83 ± 1.41 mm and 4.17 ± 1.86 mm, respectively. The analysis of repeatability was 0.997. As many as 40% of patients experienced pain refractory to analgesics. No exposure or infectious phenomenon was observed. Conclusions: This xenogeneic cortical membrane seemed to provide interesting results in the regeneration of horizontal and vertical bone defects. Comparative and prospective studies are necessary to validate the effectiveness of this membrane.

Delayed evolution of second molars is a rare phenomenon with an estimated prevalence in the mandible of 0 to 2.3%. Many etiologies have been proposed to explain these inclusions, among which the reduction of arch perimeter, distalization of first molar, mesio-angulated position of the second molar. However, the presence and position of the third molar does not seem to be a risk factor for this inclusion. Several therapeutics options with surgical management have been proposed in the literature; surgical repositioning, surgical release of the crown more or less associated with orthodontic treatment, and sometimes avulsion of the second molar to allow the third molar development. There is no recommendation on this subject, the literature describing mostly retrospective studies and case reports. This article presents the different therapeutic options in the treatment of second molar inclusions.

Research in implant dentistry has predominantly focused on bone regeneration, osseous volume maintenance, and successful osseointegration. However, soft tissue healing, which influences implant functional sealing, long-term stability, and esthetic integration, remains underexplored. This study investigated the effects of three xenogenic bone substitutes on gingival healing in vitro. Three experimental groups were established using extracts from bone substitutes diffusing through the OsteoBiol^® Evolution collagen membrane: two collagenated substitutes, OsteoBiol^® Gen-Os^® (Gen-Os) and OsteoBiol^® GTO^® (GTO), and one inorganic substitute, Bio-Oss^® (Bio-Oss). The substitutes were prepared in test tubes, and the extracts diffusing through the collagen membrane were used to evaluate human gingival cell (hGC) proliferation (MTT assay), migration (scratch assay), and growth factor release (ELISA). Angiogenic potential was assessed by endothelial cell proliferation, recruitment (Boyden chambers), and organization (Matrigel^® assays). The indirect interaction between stimulated gingival cells and human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) was investigated by analyzing hMSC recruitment and osteogenic BMP-2 secretion. Collagenated GTO and Gen-Os significantly enhanced hGC proliferation and migration in the scratch assay, with 1.8-fold and 1.6-fold increases, respectively, compared to control. All three substitutes enhanced neoangiogenesis in vitro. VEGF and FGF-2 secretion was significantly higher with GTO, showing 5-fold and 5.7-fold increases, respectively, resulting in a 3.7-fold increase in tube formation compared to control. Collagenated materials promoted hMSC recruitment, whereas BMP-2 secretion was not affected by any material. The observed effects were higher with the collagenated Gen-Os and GTO, with 2.5-fold and 2.8-fold increases, respectively, than with the non-collagenated Bio-Oss, which showed a 1.5-fold increase. These findings demonstrate that collagenated bone substitutes enhance gingival healing and angiogenic potential through barrier membranes and confirm that stimulated gingival cells indirectly promote hMSC recruitment, indicating that bone substitute effects extend beyond bone regeneration to include soft tissue healing and inter-tissue communication.

Congrès de la SFCO, SFCO, Société Française de Chirurgie Orale, EDP Sciences