Arthur Falguière

Arthur Falguière

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohammed Aso Abdulghafor
Mohammed Aso Abdulghafor
Mohammed Khalid MahmoodMohammed Khalid Mahmood
Mohammed Khalid Mahmood
Hervé AMU TasseryHervé AMU Tassery
Hervé AMU Tassery
DTDelphine Tardivo
Delphine Tardivo
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière
RLRomain Lan
Romain Lan
Biomimetic dental implants are regarded as one of the recent clinical advancements in implant surface modification. Coatings with varying thicknesses and roughness may affect the dental implant surface’s chemical inertness, cell adhesion, and antibacterial characteristics. Different surface coatings and mechanical surface changes have been studied to improve osseointegration and decrease peri-implantitis. The surface medication increases surface energy, leading to enhanced cell proliferation and growth factors, and, consequently, to a rise in the osseointegration process. This review provides a comprehensive update on the numerous biomimetic coatings used to improve the surface characteristics of dental implants and their applications in two main categories: coating to improve osseointegration, including the hydroxyapatite layer and nanocomposites, growth factors (BMPs, PDGF, FGF), and extracellular matrix (collagen, elastin, fibronectin, chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronan, and other proteoglycans), and coatings for anti-bacterial performance, covering drug-coated dental implants (antibiotic, statin, and bisphosphonate), antimicrobial peptide coating (GL13K and human beta defensins), polysaccharide antibacterial coatings (natural chitosan and its coupling agents) and metal elements (silver, zinc, and copper).

1 September 2021 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière
CLClara LeGruiec
Clara LeGruiec
HHHéloïse Herry
Héloïse Herry
SGSebastien Genest-Beucher
Sebastien Genest-Beucher
JDJean-Michel Dessus
Jean-Michel Dessus
SBSylvie Boisramé
Sylvie Boisramé

5 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCyril DEBORTOLI
Cyril DEBORTOLI
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière
FCFabrice Campana
Fabrice Campana
JCJean-hugues CATHERINE
Jean-hugues CATHERINE
DTDelphine Tardivo
Delphine Tardivo
RLRomain Lan
Romain Lan
Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reliable technique used in vertical and horizontal bone defects. The posterior mandibular region is an area limited by anatomic constraints. The use of resorbable membranes with a cortical component could compensate for the lack of rigidity of resorbable membranes without the complications of non-resorbable membranes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mean bone gains of a xenogeneic cortical membrane in horizontal and vertical bone defects in comparison with other membranes in the literature. Methods: A porcine cortical membrane was used to perform 7 GBR in the posterior mandibular region of five patients. Preoperative (T0) and six months postoperative (T1) cone beam computed tomography were superimposed to measure the horizontal and vertical bone gain. Implants were positioned at all sites, six months after GBR. Complications and bone resorption around the implants were also documented. Results: The mean horizontal and vertical bone gains were 3.83 ± 1.41 mm and 4.17 ± 1.86 mm, respectively. The analysis of repeatability was 0.997. As many as 40% of patients experienced pain refractory to analgesics. No exposure or infectious phenomenon was observed. Conclusions: This xenogeneic cortical membrane seemed to provide interesting results in the regeneration of horizontal and vertical bone defects. Comparative and prospective studies are necessary to validate the effectiveness of this membrane.

8 January 2024 in Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière
RLRomain Lan
Romain Lan
CMChristelle Manfredi
Christelle Manfredi
SWStéphanie Wong-Hee-Kam
Stéphanie Wong-Hee-Kam
NFNicolas Fakhry
Nicolas Fakhry
FCFabrice Campana
Fabrice Campana
Importance: Laser hair removal is a noninvasive technique that has been used for patients with oropharyngolaryngeal hair growth related to surgical flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer resection. The purpose of this work was to perform a rapid review of the literature to determine the therapeutic relevance of laser hair removal and identify laser parameters. Observations: A total of 10 publications addressing depilation of the head and neck sphere were selected and analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: Laser therapy appears to be a promising treatment for hair removal from flaps with few side effects. However, there is no scientific basis for a standardized protocol or determination of the superiority of laser hair removal over another treatment.

25 November 2022 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière
CMCharlotte Mansuy
Charlotte Mansuy
HNHugo Nihous
Hugo Nihous
NGNicolas Graillon
Nicolas Graillon
JCJean-Hugues Catherine
Jean-Hugues Catherine
RLRomain Lan
Romain Lan

17 October 2025 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKA. Khemis
A. Khemis
RLR. Lan
R. Lan
FAF. Amatore
F. Amatore
JRJm. Reimund
Jm. Reimund
FCF. Campana
F. Campana
AFArthur Falguière
Arthur Falguière