Gernot Jundt

Prof. Dr. Gernot Jundt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 August 2010 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJan Smida
Jan Smida
DBDaniel Baumhoer
Daniel Baumhoer
MRMichael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann
AWAxel Walch
Axel Walch
SBStefan S. Bielack
Stefan S. Bielack
MNMichaela Nathrath
Michaela Nathrath
Purpose: Osteosarcoma, the most common primary malignant tumor of the bone, is characterized by complex karyotypes with numerous structural and numerical alterations. Despite attempts to establish molecular prognostic markers at the time of diagnosis, the most accepted predictive factor remains the histologic evaluation of necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The present approach was carried out to search for genome-wide recurrent loss of heterozygosity and copy number variations that could have prognostic and therapeutic impact for osteosarcoma patients.

1 October 2015 in Oral Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP. Brunner
P. Brunner
MBM. Bihl
M. Bihl
GJGernot Jundt
Gernot Jundt
DBD. Baumhoer
D. Baumhoer
SHS. Hoeller
S. Hoeller

5 September 2018 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMB. Mijuskovic
B. Mijuskovic
RKRichard Kuehl
Richard Kuehl
AWA.F. Widmer
A.F. Widmer
GJGernot Jundt
Gernot Jundt
RFR. Frei
R. Frei
TWT. Wolff
T. Wolff
Background: Guidelines recommend both histological analysis and culture for definite diagnosis of osteomyelitis. It is not clear if histological and culture criteria can be used interchangeably in the clinical scenario of toe amputation. We therefore prospectively compared the results of intraoperative culture and those of histological examination in this setting.Methods: Consecutive patients requiring toe or forefoot amputation at the University Hospital Basel during a 2-year period were included in the study. Biopsy specimens from the residual bone were cultured according to microbiological standards. Histological analysis was performed using standardized criteria for osteomyelitis. Clinical outcomes were assessed retrospectively via chart review.Results: Of 51 patients included in the study, 33 (65%) had a positive culture of residual bone and 14 (27%) showed histological signs of osteomyelitis. A negative histological result but a positive culture was found for 21 (41%) of the patients, suggesting that culture has a high false-positive rate if histological analysis is used as the reference to rule out osteomyelitis. The recommended criteria of both positive histological findings and positive culture were fulfilled by 12 (24%) of the 51 patients.Conclusions: Positive cultures of residual bone after forefoot or toe amputation overestimate the true rate of osteomyelitis as defined by histological analysis, presumably because of contamination from soft tissue at the time of surgery. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the indications for, and the duration of, antibiotic treatment according to these findings.Clinical Relevance: Our results cast doubt on the strategy of relying solely on culture of bone biopsy specimens when deciding whether antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis is necessary after toe or forefoot amputation.

1 June 2007 in Laboratory Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexandar TzankovAlexandar Tzankov
Alexandar Tzankov
PWPhilip T Went
Philip T Went
SMSimone Muenst
Simone Muenst
TPThomas Papadopoulos
Thomas Papadopoulos
GJGernot Jundt
Gernot Jundt
SDStephan R Dirnhofer
Stephan R Dirnhofer

5 December 2017 in Der Pathologe
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GJGernot Jundt
Gernot Jundt
DBD. Baumhoer
D. Baumhoer

19 December 2017 in Der Pathologe
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GJGernot Jundt
Gernot Jundt