Landfill leachate is one of the major point sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution. In this study, powdered activated carbon (PAC), granular activated carbon (GAC), anion exchange resin (AIX), nanofiltration (NF), ozonation, and foam fractionation were tested for treatment of the same leachate. These methods were compared in terms of PFAS removal efficiencies and treatment cost. More than 75% removal of long-chain PFAS (6-9 CF₂) could be achieved with all the studied methods, though with high resource consumption. It was demonstrated that PFAS breakthrough was up to 27 times faster when the leachate was treated with GAC and AIX compared to groundwater treatment. Nanofiltration was the only method which could be practically applied for removal of PFAS with the shortest fluorinated carbon chain (3-4 CF₂). Foam fractionation and AIX offered the most economical treatment, with an estimated cost of < 1 €/m³ for PFOS and PFOA reduction to ≥ 90%. The cost of treatment was shown to increase exponentially if the goal of > 60% ΣPFAS11 removal was applied. It was also discussed that composite parameters that include expected toxicity of different PFAS, such as ΣPFOAeq, should be used to obtain a cost-efficient reduction of PFAS-induced water toxicity.

A techno-economic assessment and environmental and social sustainability assessments of novel Fischer–Tropsch (FT) biodiesel production from the wet and dry gasification of biomass-based residue streams (bark and black liquor from pulp production) for transport applications are presented. A typical French kraft pulp mill serves as the reference case and large-scale biofuel-production-process integration is explored. Relatively low greenhouse gas emission levels can be obtained for the FT biodiesel (total span: 16–83 g CO₂eq/MJ in the assessed EU countries). Actual process configuration and low-carbon electricity are critical for overall performance. The site-specific social assessment indicates an overall positive social effect for local community, value chain actors, and society. Important social aspects include (i) job creation potential, (ii) economic development through job creation and new business opportunities, and (iii) health and safety for workers. For social risks, the country of implementation is important. Heat and electricity use are the key contributors to social impacts. The estimated production cost for biobased crude oil is about 13 €/GJ, and it is 14 €/GJ (0.47 €/L or 50 €/MWh) for the FT biodiesel. However, there are uncertainties, i.e., due to the low technology readiness level of the gasification technologies, especially wet gasification. However, the studied concept may provide substantial GHG reduction compared to fossil diesel at a relatively low cost.