Caio Teves Inácio

Dr. Caio Teves Inácio

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 October 2013 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio
PCPhillip Michael Chalk
Phillip Michael Chalk
AMAlberto M.T. Magalhães
Alberto M.T. Magalhães
Among the lighter elements having two or more stable isotopes (H, C, N, O, S), δ(15)N appears to be the most promising isotopic marker to differentiate plant products from conventional and organic farms. Organic plant products vary within a range of δ(15)N values of +0.3 to +14.6%, while conventional plant products range from negative to positive values, i.e. -4.0 to +8.7%. The main factors affecting δ(15)N signatures of plants are N fertilizers, biological N2 fixation, plant organs and plant age. Correlations between mode of production and δ(13)C (except greenhouse tomatoes warmed with natural gas) or δ(34)S signatures have not been established, and δ(2)H and δ(18)O are unsuitable markers due to the overriding effect of climate on the isotopic composition of plant-available water. Because there is potential overlap between the δ(15)N signatures of organic and conventionally produced plant products, δ(15)N has seldom been used successfully as the sole criterion for differentiation, but when combined with complementary analytical techniques and appropriate statistical tools, the probability of a correct identification increases. The use of organic fertilizers by conventional farmers or the marketing of organic produce as conventional due to market pressures are additional factors confounding correct identification. The robustness of using δ(15)N to differentiate mode of production will depend on the establishment of databases that have been verified for individual plant products.

1 November 2019 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPhillip M. Chalk
Phillip M. Chalk
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio
DCDeli Chen
Deli Chen

3 August 2012 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPhillip M. Chalk
Phillip M. Chalk
AMAlberto M. T. Magalhães
Alberto M. T. Magalhães
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio

19 October 2015 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPhillip M. Chalk
Phillip M. Chalk
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio
FBFabiano De Carvalho Carvalho Balieiro
Fabiano De Carvalho Carvalho Balieiro
JRJanaina R. C. Rouws
Janaina R. C. Rouws

7 April 2015 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio
PCPhillip M. Chalk
Phillip M. Chalk
In this review, we examine the variation in stable isotope signatures of the lighter elements (δ2H, δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S) of tissues and excreta of domesticated animals, the factors affecting the isotopic composition of animal tissues, and whether stable isotopes may be used to differentiate organic and conventional modes of animal husbandry. The main factors affecting the δ13C signatures of livestock are the C3/C4 composition of the diet, the relative digestibility of the diet components, metabolic turnover, tissue and compound specificity, growth rate, and animal age. δ15N signatures of sheep and cattle products have been related mainly to diet signatures, which are quite variable among farms and between years. Although few data exist, a minor influence in δ15N signatures of animal products was attributed to N losses at the farm level, whereas stocking rate showed divergent findings. Correlations between mode of production and δ2H and δ18O have not been established, and only in one case of an animal product was δ34S a satisfactory marker for mode of production. While many data exist on diet–tissue isotopic discrimination values among domesticated animals, there is a paucity of data that allow a direct and statistically verifiable comparison of the differences in the isotopic signatures of organically and conventionally grown animal products. The few comparisons are confined to beef, milk, and egg yolk, with no data for swine or lamb products. δ13C appears to be the most promising isotopic marker to differentiate organic and conventional production systems when maize (C4) is present in the conventional animal diet. However, δ13C may be unsuitable under tropical conditions, where C4 grasses are abundant, and where grass-based husbandry is predominant in both conventional and organic systems. Presently, there is no universal analytical method that can be applied to differentiate organic and conventional animal products.

1 June 2015 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPhillip Michael Chalk
Phillip Michael Chalk
CICaio Teves Inácio
Caio Teves Inácio
ECEric T. Craswell
Eric T. Craswell
DCDeli Chen
Deli Chen