In order to find a suitable size of sheath duct and a reliable construction method for precast walls, a cast-in-place and five 1/2 scale precast drift-hardening concrete walls reinforced with weakly bonded ultra-high strength SBPDN rebars were fabricated and tested under reserved lateral load and constant compression. The experimental variables were the diameter of sheath ducts (45 mm, 100 mm, and 120 mm), embedded length (20d and 35d; d is the nominal diameter of SBPDN rebars), axial load ratio (0.075 and 0.15), and the construction method. The experimental observations, hysteresis behaviors, envelope curves, residual deformation, crack propagation, and energy dissipation were compared in the study. Moreover, a formula was applied to calculate the bond strength of the sheath duct. The experimental and calculated results revealed that increasing the axial load ratio and embedment length could not enhance the bond strength of the sheath ducts, and increasing the diameter decreased the bond strength significantly. Anchored the SBPDN rebars in smaller sheath ducts separately was a more stable connection method for precast concrete shear walls and provided sufficient drift-hardening capability, even at a large drift level (over 3%).

This paper experimentally and analytically investigated the damage and seismic behavior of concrete walls reinforced by low-bond ultra-high-strength (LBUHS) bars. To this end, four half-scale rectangular concrete walls were fabricated and tested under reversed cyclic loading and constant axial compression. The test variables were the shear span ratio and the axial load ratio. Based on the test results, the propagation of cracks on the wall surface, the maximum strain capacity of concrete, the hysteresis loops and envelope curves, the residual drifts, and the strain distributions of LBUHS rebars were presented and discussed. The experimental results showed that all the test walls could exhibit drift-hardening capability until at least a 2.0% drift ratio if LBUHS rebars were anchored by nuts at their ends. The test results also indicated that the maximum strain capacity of concrete was above 0.86%, much larger than the currently recommended 0.4%. After unloading from the transient drift ratios of 2.0% and 2.5% for the walls with shear span ratios of 1.5 and 2.0, respectively, the measured residual drift ratios were controlled below 0.4%, which is less than the critical drift ratio (0.5%) having 98% repairable probability recommended in the FEMA document (P-58) for general concrete structures. Furthermore, a numerical method was presented to evaluate the cyclic response of the test walls, and a comparison between the experimental and the calculated results verified the reliability and accuracy of the proposed numerical method.