Background: Computed tomography to body divergence (CTBD) is one of the main barriers to bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of peripherally located lung nodules. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance is being rapidly adopted to correct for this phenomenon and to potentially increase diagnostic outcomes. In this trial, we hypothesized that the addition of mobile CBCT (m-CBCT) could improve the rate of tool in lesion (TIL) and the diagnostic yield of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (SS-RAB). Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm study, which enrolled patients with peripheral lung nodules of 1–3 cm and compared the rate of TIL and the diagnostic yield of SS-RAB alone and combined with mCBCT. Results: A total of 67 subjects were enrolled, the median nodule size was 1.7 cm (range, 0.9–3 cm). TIL was achieved in 23 patients (34.3%) with SS-RAB alone, and 66 patients (98.6%) with the addition of mCBCT (p < 0.0001). The diagnostic yield of SS-RAB alone was 29.9% (95% CI, 29.3–42.3%) and it was 86.6% (95% CI, 76–93.7%) with the addition of mCBCT (p < 0.0001). There were no pneumothoraxes or any bronchoscopy-related complications, and the median total dose–area product (DAP) was 50.5 Gy-cm². Conclusions: The addition of mCBCT guidance to SS-RAB allows bronchoscopists to compensate for CTBD, leading to an increase in TIL and diagnostic yield, with acceptable radiation exposure.

Atelectasis during bronchoscopy under general anesthesia is very common and can have a detrimental effect on navigational and diagnostic outcomes. While the intraprocedural incidence and anatomic location have been previously described, the severity of atelectasis has not. We reviewed chest CT images of patients who developed atelectasis in the VESPA trial (Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis). By drawing boundaries at the posterior chest wall (A), the anterior aspect of the vertebral body (C), and mid-way between these two lines (B), we delineated at-risk lung zones 1, 2, and 3 (from posterior to anterior). An Atelectasis Severity Score System (“ASSESS”) was created, classifying atelectasis as “mild” (zone 1), “moderate” (zones 1–2), and “severe” (zones 1–2–3). A total of 43 patients who developed atelectasis were included in this study. A total of 32 patients were in the control arm, and 11 were in the VESPA arm; 20 patients (47%) had mild atelectasis, 20 (47%) had moderate atelectasis, and 3 (6%) had severe atelectasis. A higher BMI was associated with increased odds (1.5 per 1 unit change; 95% CI, 1.10–2.04) (p = 0.0098), and VESPA was associated with decreased odds (0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.47) (p = 0.0080) of developing moderate to severe atelectasis. ASSESS is a simple method used to categorize intra-bronchoscopy atelectasis, which allows for a qualitative description of this phenomenon to be developed. In the VESPA trial, a higher BMI was not only associated with increased incidence but also increased severity of atelectasis, while VESPA had the opposite effect. Preventive strategies should be strongly considered in patients with risk factors for atelectasis who have lesions located in zones 1 and 2, but not in zone 3.

Airway stents, first developed in the 1980s, have become fundamental in managing a multitude of airway pathologies and complications within the field of interventional pulmonology. The primary function of an airway stent is to re-establish airway patency and integrity when obstruction, stenosis, anastomotic dehiscence, or fistulae develop as a result of various malignant or benign conditions. Nevertheless, airway stents are foreign bodies that can result in complications. In this review article, we will discuss airway stents and their ongoing role in the management of several malignant and benign diseases. We will describe indications for airway stenting and review the elements that must be taken into consideration for optimal patient and stent selection. Given the prevalence of data regarding therapeutic bronchoscopy and airway stenting in malignant airway obstruction, much of the discussion in this review will focus on stent placement for that indication. We will also review the data as it pertains to safety, efficacy, and complications after stent placement, and conclude with a discussion of the future applications and research avenues related to airway stents.