Background/Objectives: Cage implantation decompresses neural elements, stabilizes segments, and promotes fusion, with sagittal balance influenced by cage size, geometry, and position. This retrospective study compared the effects of lumbar interbody cages with 10° and 15° lordotic angles on global and segmental lordosis in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: Data from 215 patients who underwent 259 TLIF procedures between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed. All the surgeries were performed by a single senior orthopedic spine surgeon, and cages were selected by the surgeon based on patients’ clinical and anatomical factors. Radiographic assessments included measurements of global and segmental lordosis. Results: Patients who received 15° cages demonstrated significantly greater segmental lordosis compared to those who received 10° cages in both bisegmental and monosegmental procedures (p < 0.001). While the global lordosis in the 10°-cage group remained unchanged postoperatively (p = 0.687), bisegmental procedures showed a small but statistically significant increase (p = 0.035). Moreover, global lordosis did not significantly differ between the 10°- and 15°-cage groups. Conclusions: Cage geometry significantly influenced segmental lordosis, with 15° cages achieving overall more superior radiographic results compared to 10° cages. However, global lordosis was unaffected by cage angle, thereby highlighting the multifaceted nature of factors that influence overall spinal alignment. These findings provide valuable insights into lumbar spine surgery, thus emphasizing the need for comprehensive preoperative planning and consideration of individual patient characteristics.

Introduction A significant percentage of patients require re-revision surgery regardless of the demonstrated durable short- and mid-term clinical results using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the association between sleeve alignment and contact zones, with loosening in patients with revision TKA. Materials & Methods Of a series of 103 patients who underwent revision TKA, at a mean follow-up of eight years, six patients were re-revised for tibial loosening. These patients were compared with 19 unrevised control subjects in a 1:3 ratio. We calculated and compared the cumulative number of contact zones between the porous-coated part of the sleeve and bone on immediate postoperative X-rays between re-revised and unrevised patients. The main hypothesis was that neutral positioning and absolute circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve would lead to a better outcome. Results The use of a conservative (nonparametric) approach indeed revealed better circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve among the survivors, i.e., survivors: median (interquartile range [IQR]): 3 (2-4); failures: 3 ( 1-3), p = 0.003 (Mann-Whitney [MW] test). The difference was borderline significant for coronal alignment, i.e., survivors: median (IQR): -1 (-4 to 2); failures: 0 (-1 to 3), p = 0.0569 (MW test). Conclusion A circumferential bony contact of the metaphyseal sleeve would lead to better survival of the revision implant, whereas the degree of varus fixation did not seem to influence the longevity of the implant.

Preoperative anemia remains a major determinant of transfusion risk in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), even within contemporary patient blood management (P