Background: The impact of a wide surgical margin on the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been evaluated in relation to the type of liver resection performed, anatomical or non-anatomical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical margin status on outcomes in patients undergoing anatomical or non-anatomical resection for solitary HCC. Methods: Data from patients with solitary HCC who had undergone non-anatomical partial resection (Hr0 group) or anatomical resection of one Couinaud segment (HrS group) between 2000 and 2007 were extracted from a nationwide survey database in Japan. Overall and recurrence-free survival associated with the surgical margin status and width were evaluated in the two groups. Results: A total of 4457 patients were included in the Hr0 group and 3507 in the HrS group. A microscopically positive surgical margin was associated with poor overall survival in both groups. A negative but 0-mm surgical margin was associated with poorer overall and recurrence-free survival than a wider margin only in the Hr0 group. In the HrS group, the width of the surgical margin was not associated with patient outcome. Conclusion: Anatomical resection with a negative 0-mm surgical margin may be acceptable. Non-anatomical resection with a negative 0-mm margin was associated with a less favourable survival outcome.

Background Recently, the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was followed by a proposal of the American Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) system. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of both systems to predict survival after curative resection for mass‐forming ICC and to establish a new staging system based on survival analysis results. The present study was conducted as a project study of the Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery. Methods Clinical data from 233 patients who underwent curative resection for mass‐forming ICC were retrospectively reviewed. Survival analysis was performed to identify predictors of postoperative outcomes, and a new staging system was established. The survival stratification of our proposed system was compared with two previous staging systems. Results A N0M0 cohort analysis demonstrated that tumor size, tumor number, and vascular invasion were independently associated with survival after curative resection for mass‐forming ICC, whereas serosal and periductal invasion were not. Of patients with nodal metastases, patients with T4 tumor had significantly lower overall survival rate than patients with T1, T2, or T3 tumor. Thus, we proposed a new staging system as follows: serosal invasion was excluded from the LCSGJ T categories, and patients with nodal metastases were divided into stage IVA or IVB according to T classification. The new system better stratified survival after curative resection for mass‐forming ICC than the two previous systems. Conclusions The AJCC/UICC staging system failed to stratify the Japanese patients with mass‐forming ICC. The new staging system provided better survival prediction in the patients who underwent curative resection for mass‐forming ICC, although further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of tumor size on survival.

Thirty years have passed since the first report of portal vein embolization (PVE), and this procedure is widely adopted as a preoperative treatment procedure for patients with a small future liver remnant (FLR). PVE has been shown to be useful in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver disease. However, special caution is needed when PVE is applied prior to subsequent major hepatic resection in cases with cirrhotic livers, and volumetric analysis of the liver segments in addition to evaluation of the liver functional reserve before PVE is mandatory in such cases. Advances in the embolic material and selection of the treatment approach, and combined use of PVE and transcatheter arterial embolization/chemoembolization have yielded improved outcomes after PVE and major hepatic resections. A novel procedure termed the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy has been gaining attention because of the rapid hypertrophy of the FLR observed in patients undergoing this procedure, however, application of this technique in HCC patients requires special caution, as it has been shown to be associated with a high morbidity and mortality even in cases with essentially healthy livers.