Background/Objectives: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age, characterized by symptoms such as menstrual irregularities, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic experiences of women with PCOS in Saudi Arabia, evaluating the timeline to diagnosis, the adequacy of information provided, and overall patient satisfaction with the healthcare process. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 1182 women diagnosed with PCOS across Saudi Arabia. The survey collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, the timeline from symptom onset to diagnosis, the number of healthcare visits required for diagnosis, and satisfaction with the information and support provided during the diagnostic process. Statistical analyses, including linear regression, were performed to identify factors influencing patient satisfaction. Results: The study found that 43.2% of participants sought medical attention within a year of symptom onset, yet significant delays in diagnosis were common, with 28.6% of women waiting six months or more after seeking medical care. Only 42.7% of women reported receiving adequate information at diagnosis, and satisfaction levels varied across different aspects of care. Key predictors of lower satisfaction included marital status and longer time since diagnosis, while quicker diagnosis and more healthcare visits before diagnosis positively influenced satisfaction. Conclusions: The findings highlight critical gaps in the diagnostic process and patient education for PCOS in Saudi Arabia. The widespread dissatisfaction with the information provided underscores the need for improved patient-centered care, comprehensive education, and standardized diagnostic protocols. Addressing these issues could enhance patient satisfaction and lead to better management of PCOS, both in Saudi Arabia and globally.

Background: After pancreatic surgery, the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious concern. POPF involves the leakage of pancreatic fluids from the surgical site, which can lead to complications and even death. Preventing POPF is essential for enhancing patient recovery and lessening the impact on healthcare resources. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated medical methods and surgical techniques to prevent POPF. Methods: This study was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42024500938. An electronic search was conducted through the PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases for all relevant articles published in English from 2018 to 2023. The following search terms were used: ((Whipple procedure OR Pancreaticojejunal OR Pancreaticogastrostomy) AND (Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula) AND (Prevention OR Octreotide OR Sealant agent OR Stent OR Postoperative drain)). Results: Of 260 papers, 28 articles extracted through the database search were considered suitable for the systematic review. The included studies investigated a variety of surgical approaches for pancreatic resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was the most prevalent intervention. The incidence rates for POPF varied widely across the studies, ranging from as low as 11.6% to as high as 100%. The incidence rate of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) ranged from 11.7% to 33.3%. The length of postoperative hospital stays also varied significantly. Discussion: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) affects 13–41% of patients post-pancreatic surgery. Despite its high incidence, mortality rates are low. Postoperative hospital stay varies, with higher rates in older patients and overweight individuals. Advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have reduced mortality rates to <5%. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the outcomes of pancreatectomy, including the incidence of POPF, postoperative hospital stays, and mortality rate. The findings suggest that the incidence of POPF is similar to that suggested in the literature and is influenced by various factors.

Background and Objectives: Diabetes affects quality of life (QoL) in physical, psychological, and social aspects. With high prevalence rates in Saudi Arabia, this study aimed to assess QoL in adults with diabetes across different regions and identify associated factors, addressing research gaps on complications and demographic influences. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited adults diagnosed with diabetes from all regions of Saudi Arabia through phone interviews and the distribution of self-administered questionnaires via social media platforms. Data on demographics, health behaviors, diabetes-related complications, comorbidities, and diabetes management were collected. QoL was assessed using the Diabetic Quality of Life (DQoL) tool. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariate regression, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Among the 527 individuals with diabetes, 57.7% were married, 56.1% were female, 93.7% lived in urban areas, and 37.2% had at least a bachelor’s degree. Common comorbidities included hypertension (29.2%) and hypercholesterolemia (22.8%). Physical activity and healthy weight were linked to improved DQoL. Diabetic complications, such as neuropathy (6.6%) and diabetic foot (4.9%), were significantly associated with lower DQoL scores. Depression was reported in 4.7% of participants and was the strongest predictor of poor QoL (β = −2.01, p < 0.001). Furthermore, individuals who exercised less than five times per week had significantly lower QoL scores (beta = −1.83; 95% CI = −2.56 to −1.10; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: The study highlights the significant impact of education, health behaviors, diabetes complications, and comorbid depression on QoL. Comprehensive diabetes care that addresses both physical and psychological factors is essential for achieving improved outcomes.

Background: Monitoring and managing gestational weight gain (GWG) during antenatal care (ANC) is linked to better maternal and neonatal outcomes. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines are based on pre-pregnancy BMI and reduce obstetric risks. Pregnant women’s views and healthcare providers’ (HCPs) practices are key to effective GWG counseling. This study aims to: (1) investigate the proportion of women who received GWG advice per IOM guidelines, and (2) explore HCP practices and views on GWG counseling. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of Saudi pregnant women who delivered within one year of the study and HCPs who provided ANC. Women provided data on demographics, pre-pregnancy BMI, recall of GWG advice, and their target GWG. HCPs rated their knowledge and counseling practices. Results: Of 1151 women, 48.8% were pre-pregnancy overweight or obese, 47.6% were normal weight, and 3.6% were underweight. Most women (74.5%) received no GWG advice, and only 8.8% followed IOM guidelines. Women with obesity and overweight were more likely to receive correct advice (15.5% and 11.5%), compared to 5.3% of normal-weight and 2.4% underweight women. Overweight and obese women were more likely to define the correct GWG (AOR = 2.84 and 5.85). Receiving proper advice greatly increased the likelihood of proper GWG definition (AOR = 7.13). Among 28 HCPs, 53.6% reported that women rarely ask about the GWG target. Nearly 93% of them weigh women at each visit, but only 21.4% set personalized GWG targets. Most HCPs (82.2%) viewed discussing GWG as a high priority, and 70% felt confident providing guidance on GWG, diet, and exercise. Conclusions: Many women receive no GWG guidance, and most advice does not align with IOM guidelines. Enhancing Saudi women’s knowledge regarding GWG targets through health education, in conjunction with ongoing medical education for healthcare professionals concerning guidelines for GWG, represents modifiable factors and a critical opportunity to foster healthier pregnancy outcomes.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective long-acting contraceptives. However, pain associated with insertion deters some women and impacts satisfaction. This systematic review critically evaluates the effectiveness of local anesthetics, misoprostol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and conscious sedation for managing pain associated with IUD insertion. A comprehensive database search including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest was conducted from inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs assessing interventions for IUD insertion pain were included. Case reports, non-randomized studies, and non-English papers were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted data on pain outcomes and adverse effects. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. Thirty-nine RCTs (n = 12,345 women) met the inclusion criteria. Topical lidocaine effectively reduced pain on consistent findings across multiple high-quality RCTs. Misoprostol pretreatment facilitated easier insertions through cervical ripening. However, evidence for NSAIDs was inconclusive, with some RCTs finding no additional benefits versus placebo. Results also remained unclear for nitrous oxide conscious sedation due to variability in protocols. Nulliparity predicted higher reported pain consistently. Lidocaine and misoprostol show promise for minimizing IUD insertion pain and difficulty. Further optimization is required to standardize conscious sedation and fully evaluate NSAIDs. Improving pain management may increase favorable experiences and uptake of this reliable method.