Burkhard Schillinger

Dr. Burkhard Schillinger

Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (FRM II) and Physik-Department E21, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2015 in Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichael Schulz
Michael Schulz
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger
The neutron imaging facility ANTARES, operated by the Technische Universität München, is located at the cold neutron beam port SR-4a. Based on a pinhole camera principle with a variable collimator located close to the beam port, the facility provides the possibility for flexible use in high resolution and high flux imaging.

14 January 2018 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger
ABAmélie Beaudet
Amélie Beaudet
AFAnna Fedrigo
Anna Fedrigo
FGFrancesco Grazzi
Francesco Grazzi
OKOttmar Kullmer
Ottmar Kullmer
CZClément Zanolli
Clément Zanolli
Neutron Imaging is ideally suited for applications in cultural heritage even at small reactors with moderate image resolution. However, recently, high resolution imaging is being increasingly used for advanced studies, especially in paleontology. The special contrast for hydrogen and between neighboring elements in the periodic system allows for new applications that are not accessible for X-rays, like organic material in enclosed containers made of ceramics or metals, fossilized bones in chalk rock or in ferrous “red” beds, and even for animal and hominid teeth. Fission neutrons permit the examination of large samples that otherwise show large attenuation for thermal neutrons.

1 April 2005 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger
HAH. Abele
H. Abele
JBJ. Brunner
J. Brunner
GFG. Frei
G. Frei
RGR. Gähler
R. Gähler
PVP. Vontobel
P. Vontobel

19 November 2020 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWilliam Chan
William Chan
Aaron CraftAaron Craft
Aaron Craft
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger
XXxx xx
xx xx
ATAlessandro Tengattini
Alessandro Tengattini
In digital neutron imaging, the neutron scintillator screen is a limiting factor of spatial resolution and neutron capture efficiency and must be improved to enhance the capabilities of digital neutron imaging systems. Commonly used neutron scintillators are based on 6LiF and gadolinium oxysulfide neutron converters. This work explores boron-based neutron scintillators because 10B has a neutron absorption cross-section four times greater than 6Li, less energetic daughter products than Gd and 6Li, and lower γ-ray sensitivity than Gd. These factors all suggest that, although borated neutron scintillators may not produce as much light as 6Li-based screens, they may offer improved neutron statistics and spatial resolution. This work conducts a parametric study to determine the effects of various boron neutron converters, scintillator and converter particle sizes, converter-to-scintillator mix ratio, substrate materials, and sensor construction on image quality. The best performing boron-based scintillator screens demonstrated an improvement in neutron detection efficiency when compared with a common 6LiF/ZnS scintillator, with a 125% increase in thermal neutron detection efficiency and 67% increase in epithermal neutron detection efficiency. The spatial resolution of high-resolution borated scintillators was measured, and the neutron tomography of a test object was successfully performed using some of the boron-based screens that exhibited the highest spatial resolution. For some applications, boron-based scintillators can be utilized to increase the performance of a digital neutron imaging system by reducing acquisition times and improving neutron statistics.

1 August 2011 in Journal of Materials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBK. Beyer
K. Beyer
TKT. Kannengiesser
T. Kannengiesser
AGAxel Griesche
Axel Griesche
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger

1 January 2019 in Integrative Organismal Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TYTzu-Ruei Yang
Tzu-Ruei Yang
TET Engler
T Engler
JLJ N Lallensack
J N Lallensack
ASA Samathi
A Samathi
MMMalgorzata Makowska
Malgorzata Makowska
Burkhard SchillingerBurkhard Schillinger
Burkhard Schillinger
Synopsis: Dinosaur nesting biology has been an intriguing research topic, though dinosaur behaviors were relatively less illuminated because of the constraints of the fossil record. For instance, hatching asynchrony, where eggs in a single clutch hatch at different times, is unique to modern neoavian birds but was also suggested to be present in oviraptorid dinosaurs based on a possible partial clutch of four embryo-containing eggs from Mongolia. Unfortunately, unequivocal evidence for the origination of these eggs from a single clutch is lacking. Here we report a new, better preserved partial oviraptorid clutch with three embryo-containing eggs—a single egg (Egg I) and a pair (Egg II/III)—from the Late Cretaceous Nanxiong Group of Jiangxi Province, China. Geopetal features indicate that the pair of eggs was laid prior to the single egg. Neutron tomographic images in combination with osteological features indicate that the embryo of the single egg is less developed than those of the paired eggs. Eggshell histology suggests that the embryo-induced erosion in the paired eggs is markedly more pronounced than in the single egg, providing a new line of evidence for hatching asynchrony. The inferred hatching asynchrony in combination with previously surmised thermoregulatory incubation and communal nesting behaviors very likely suggests that oviraptorid dinosaurs presented a unique reproductive biology lacking modern analogs, which is contrary to the predominant view that their reproductive biology was intermediate between that of modern crocodiles and birds.