Introduction: Diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke depends upon imaging, namely non-contrast CT (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA), CT perfusion (CTP), and MRI. We sought to i) examine available data from around the world on six categories related to acute stroke imaging: utilization, time to imaging, radiation exposure, contrast dose, availability, and cost, and ii) compare that information with similar data from our province (Alberta). Methods: Using a scoping review methodology, six categories related to acute stroke diagnostic imaging were examined: utilization, time to imaging, radiation exposure, contrast dose, availability, and cost. Metadata for these categories in Alberta were collected from Alberta Health Services administrative records for comparison. Results: A total of 6693 articles/documents were initially identified through database searches, of which 83 were included for analysis. CT (range = 55-100%) was used more frequently than MRI (range = 23.6-94.0%) in acute stroke, with high CTA use in Alberta (55.7%) compared to other centres (range = 8.6-36.0%; Table 1). CT time to imaging was < 25 min (target time) in most centres, but not in Alberta (mean = 3.2 hr, median = 2.0 hr). MRI was not used urgently in most centres (mean = 0.4-21.0 hr), including Alberta (mean = 15.4 hr, median = 13.0 hr). CTA radiation exposure was greater in Alberta compared to other centres (5.7 mSv vs 2.8-5.4 mSv) whereas it was similar for NCCT and CTP. Contrast doses for CTA and CTP were similar between Alberta (CTA = 50-70 mL, CTP = 45 mL) and other centres (CTA = 40-150 mL, CTP = 30-60 mL). Lastly, the number of CT and MRI scanners per million population and cost of operating them was similar worldwide. Conclusions: In conclusion, no studies were identified that provide a comprehensive overview of all six factors relevant to diagnostic imaging in acute stroke. The Alberta metadata fills in this literature gap, specifically in the context of Canadian stroke care. Download figure