Neil Vaughan

Prof. Neil Vaughan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2015 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Neil VaughanNeil Vaughan
Neil Vaughan
VDVenketesh N. Dubey
Venketesh N. Dubey
Thomas William WainwrightThomas William Wainwright
Thomas William Wainwright
RMRobert G. Middleton
Robert G. Middleton
This review presents current virtual reality based training simulators for hip, knee and other orthopaedic surgery, including elective and trauma surgical procedures. There have not been any reviews focussing on hip and knee orthopaedic simulators. A comparison of existing simulator features is provided to identify what is missing and what is required to improve upon current simulators. In total 11 hip replacements pre-operative planning tools were analysed, plus 9 hip trauma fracture training simulators. Additionally 9 knee arthroscopy simulators and 8 other orthopaedic simulators were included for comparison. The findings are that for orthopaedic surgery simulators in general, there is increasing use of patient-specific virtual models which reduce the learning curve. Modelling is also being used for patient-specific implant design and manufacture. Simulators are being increasingly validated for assessment as well as training. There are very few training simulators available for hip replacement, yet more advanced virtual reality is being used for other procedures such as hip trauma and drilling. Training simulators for hip replacement and orthopaedic surgery in general lag behind other surgical procedures for which virtual reality has become more common. Further developments are required to bring hip replacement training simulation up to date with other procedures. This suggests there is a gap in the market for a new high fidelity hip replacement and resurfacing training simulator.

1 November 2016 in Computer Science Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Neil VaughanNeil Vaughan
Neil Vaughan
BGBodgan Gabrys
Bodgan Gabrys
VDVenketesh N. Dubey
Venketesh N. Dubey

1 January 2016 in Procedia Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Neil VaughanNeil Vaughan
Neil Vaughan
BGBogdan Gabrys
Bogdan Gabrys
This research proposes the application of dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm to analyse multivariate data from virtual reality training simulators, to assess the skill level of trainees. We present results of DTW algorithm applied to trajectory data from a virtual reality haptic training simulator for epidural needle insertion. The proposed application of DTW algorithm serves two purposes, to enable (i) two trajectories to be compared as a similarity measure and also enables (ii) two or more trajectories to be combined together to produce a typical or representative average trajectory using a novel hierarchical DTW process.Our experiments included 100 expert and 100 novice simulator recordings. The data consists of multivariate time series data-streams including multi-dimensional trajectories combined with force and pressure measurements.Our results show that our proposed application of DTW provides a useful time-independent method for (i) comparing two trajectories by providing a similarity measure and (ii) combining two or more trajectories into one, showing higher performance compared to conventional methods such as linear mean. These results demonstrate that DTW can be useful within virtual reality training simulators to provide a component in an automated scoring and assessment feedback system

30 March 2013 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Neil VaughanNeil Vaughan
Neil Vaughan
VDVenketesh N. Dubey
Venketesh N. Dubey
MWMichael Y.K. Wee
Michael Y.K. Wee
RIRichard Isaacs
Richard Isaacs
Thirty-one central neural blockade simulators have been implemented into clinical practice over the last thirty years either commercially or for research. This review aims to provide a detailed evaluation of why we need epidural and spinal simulators in the first instance and then draws comparisons between computer-based and manikin-based simulators. This review covers thirty-one simulators in total; sixteen of which are solely epidural simulators, nine are for epidural plus spinal or lumbar puncture simulation, and six, which are solely lumbar puncture simulators. All hardware and software components of simulators are discussed, including actuators, sensors, graphics, haptics, and virtual reality based simulators. The purpose of this comparative review is to identify the direction for future epidural simulation by outlining necessary improvements to create the ideal epidural simulator. The weaknesses of existing simulators are discussed and their strengths identified so that these can be carried forward. This review aims to provide a foundation for the future creation of advanced simulators to enhance the training of epiduralists, enabling them to comprehensively practice epidural insertion in vitro before training on patients and ultimately reducing the potential risk of harm.

10 May 2019 in Current Medical Research and Opinion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed MediouniMohamed Mediouni
Mohamed Mediouni
TKTheodore Kucklick
Theodore Kucklick
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet
RMRiadh Madiouni
Riadh Madiouni
AAAmine Abouaomar
Amine Abouaomar
KHKevin Ho
Kevin Ho
Introduction: Many orthopaedic procedures require drilling of bone, especially fracture repair cases. Bone drilling results in heat generation due to the friction between the bone and the drill bit. A high-level of heat generation kills bone cells. Bone cell death results in resorption of bone around bone screws. Materials and methods: We searched in the literature for data on parameters that influence drilling bone and could lead to thermal necrosis. The points of view of many orthopaedists and neurosurgeons based upon on previous practices and clinical experience are presented. Results: Several potential complications are discussed and highlighted that lead to thermal necrosis. Discussion: Even in the face of growing evidence as to the negative effects of heat-induction during drilling, simple and effective methods for monitoring and cooling in real-time are not in widespread usage today. For that purpose, we propose some suggestions for the future of bone drilling, taking note of recent advances in autonomous robotics, intelligent systems, and computer simulation techniques. Conclusions: These advances in prevention of thermal necrosis during bone drilling surgery are expected to reduce the risk of patient injury and costs for the health service.

2 March 2017 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mohamed MediouniMohamed Mediouni
Mohamed Mediouni
DSDaniel R. Schlatterer
Daniel R. Schlatterer
AKAmal Khoury
Amal Khoury
TBTobias Von Bergen
Tobias Von Bergen
SSSunil H. Shetty
Sunil H. Shetty
AVAlexander Volosnikov
Alexander Volosnikov