Purpose of review A strong male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) prevalence has been observed with striking consistency, but no mechanism has yet to definitively account for this sex difference. This review explores the current status of epidemiological, genetic, and neuroendocrinological work addressing ASD prevalence and liability in males and females, so as to frame the major issues necessary to pursue a more complete understanding of the biological basis for sex-differential risk. Recent findings Recent studies continue to report a male bias in ASD prevalence, but also suggest that sex differences in phenotypic presentation, including fewer restricted and repetitive behaviors and externalizing behavioral problems in females, may contribute to this bias. Genetic studies demonstrate that females are protected from the effects of heritable and de-novo ASD risk variants, and compelling work suggests that sex chromosomal genes and/or sex hormones, especially testosterone, may modulate the effects of genetic variation on the presentation of an autistic phenotype. Summary ASDs affect females less frequently than males, and several sex-differential genetic and hormonal factors may contribute. Future work to determine the mechanisms by which these factors confer risk and protection to males and females is essential.

INTRODUCTION: The DNA of protein-coding genes is transcribed into mRNA, which is translated into proteins. The “coding genome” describes the DNA that contains the information to make these proteins and represents ~1.5% of the human genome. Newly arising de novo mutations (variants observed in a child but not in either parent) in the coding genome contribute to numerous childhood developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Discovery of these effects is aided by the triplet code that enables the functional impact of many mutations to be readily deciphered. In contrast, the “noncoding genome” covers the remaining ~98.5% and includes elements that regulate when, where, and to what degree protein-coding genes are transcribed. Understanding this noncoding sequence could provide insights into human disorders and refined control of emerging genetic therapies. Yet little is known about the role of mutations in noncoding regions, including whether they contribute to childhood developmental disorders, which noncoding elements are most vulnerable to disruption, and the manner in which information is encoded in the noncoding genome.RATIONALE: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides the opportunity to identify the majority of genetic variation in each individual. By performing WGS on 1902 quartet families including a child affected with ASD, one unaffected sibling control, and their parents, we identified ~67 de novo mutations across each child’s genome. To characterize the functional role of these mutations, we integrated multiple datasets relating to gene function, genes implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, conservation across species, and epigenetic markers, thereby combinatorially defining 55,143 categories. The scope of the problem—testing for an excess of de novo mutations in cases relative to controls for each category—is challenging because there are more categories than families.RESULTS: Comparing cases to controls, we observed an excess of de novo mutations in cases in individual categories in the coding genome but not in the noncoding genome. To overcome the challenge of detecting noncoding association, we used machine learning tools to develop a de novo risk score to look for an excess of de novo mutations across multiple categories. This score demonstrated a contribution to ASD risk from coding mutations and a weaker, but significant, contribution from noncoding mutations. This noncoding signal was driven by mutations in the promoter region, defined as the 2000 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) where mRNA synthesis starts. The strongest promoter signals were defined by conservation across species and transcription factor binding sites. Well-defined promoter elements (e.g., TATA-box) are usually observed within 80 nucleotides of the TSS; however, the strongest ASD association was observed distally, 750 to 2000 nucleotides upstream of the TSS.CONCLUSION: We conclude that de novo mutations in the noncoding genome contribute to ASD. The clearest evidence of noncoding ASD association came from mutations at evolutionarily conserved nucleotides in the promoter region. The enrichment for transcription factor binding sites, primarily in the distal promoter, suggests that these mutations may disrupt gene transcription via their interaction with enhancer elements in the promoter region, rather than interfering with transcriptional initiation directly. Promoter regions in autism.: De novo mutations from 1902 quartet families are assigned to 55,143 annotation categories, which are each assessed for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) association by comparing mutation counts in cases and sibling controls. A de novo risk score demonstrated a noncoding contribution to ASD driven by promoter mutations, especially at sites conserved across species, in the distal promoter or targeted by transcription factors.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more prevalent in males, and the mechanisms behind this sex-differential risk are not fully understood. Two competing, but not mutually exclusive, hypotheses are that ASD risk genes are sex-differentially regulated, or alternatively, that they interact with characteristic sexually dimorphic pathways. Here we characterized sexually dimorphic gene expression in multiple data sets from neurotypical adult and prenatal human neocortical tissue, and evaluated ASD risk genes for evidence of sex-biased expression. We find no evidence for systematic sex-differential expression of ASD risk genes. Instead, we observe that genes expressed at higher levels in males are significantly enriched for genes upregulated in post-mortem autistic brain, including astrocyte and microglia markers. This suggests that it is not sex-differential regulation of ASD risk genes, but rather naturally occurring sexually dimorphic processes, potentially including neuron–glial interactions, that modulate the impact of risk variants and contribute to the sex-skewed prevalence of ASD.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental condition that affects approximately four times as many males as females, a strong sex bias that has not yet been fully explained. Understanding the causes of this biased prevalence may highlight novel avenues for treatment development that could benefit patients with diverse genetic backgrounds, and the expertise of sex differences researchers will be invaluable in this endeavor. In this review, I aim to assess current evidence pertaining to the sex difference in ASD prevalence and to identify outstanding questions and remaining gaps in our understanding of how males come to be more frequently affected and/or diagnosed with ASD. Though males consistently outnumber females in ASD prevalence studies, prevalence estimates generated using different approaches report male/female ratios of variable magnitude that suggest that ascertainment or diagnostic biases may contribute to the male skew in ASD. Here, I present the different methods applied and implications of their findings. Additionally, even as prevalence estimations challenge the degree of male bias in ASD, support is growing for the long-proposed female protective effect model of ASD risk, and I review the relevant results from recurrence rate, quantitative trait, and genetic analyses. Lastly, I describe work investigating several sex-differential biological factors and pathways that may be responsible for females’ protection and/or males’ increased risk predicted by the female protective effect model, including sex steroid hormone exposure and regulation and sex-differential activity of certain neural cell types. However, much future work from both the ASD and sex differences research communities will be required to flesh out our understanding of how these factors act to influence the developing brain and modulate ASD risk.