INTRODUCTION: The DNA of protein-coding genes is transcribed into mRNA, which is translated into proteins. The “coding genome” describes the DNA that contains the information to make these proteins and represents ~1.5% of the human genome. Newly arising de novo mutations (variants observed in a child but not in either parent) in the coding genome contribute to numerous childhood developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Discovery of these effects is aided by the triplet code that enables the functional impact of many mutations to be readily deciphered. In contrast, the “noncoding genome” covers the remaining ~98.5% and includes elements that regulate when, where, and to what degree protein-coding genes are transcribed. Understanding this noncoding sequence could provide insights into human disorders and refined control of emerging genetic therapies. Yet little is known about the role of mutations in noncoding regions, including whether they contribute to childhood developmental disorders, which noncoding elements are most vulnerable to disruption, and the manner in which information is encoded in the noncoding genome.RATIONALE: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides the opportunity to identify the majority of genetic variation in each individual. By performing WGS on 1902 quartet families including a child affected with ASD, one unaffected sibling control, and their parents, we identified ~67 de novo mutations across each child’s genome. To characterize the functional role of these mutations, we integrated multiple datasets relating to gene function, genes implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, conservation across species, and epigenetic markers, thereby combinatorially defining 55,143 categories. The scope of the problem—testing for an excess of de novo mutations in cases relative to controls for each category—is challenging because there are more categories than families.RESULTS: Comparing cases to controls, we observed an excess of de novo mutations in cases in individual categories in the coding genome but not in the noncoding genome. To overcome the challenge of detecting noncoding association, we used machine learning tools to develop a de novo risk score to look for an excess of de novo mutations across multiple categories. This score demonstrated a contribution to ASD risk from coding mutations and a weaker, but significant, contribution from noncoding mutations. This noncoding signal was driven by mutations in the promoter region, defined as the 2000 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) where mRNA synthesis starts. The strongest promoter signals were defined by conservation across species and transcription factor binding sites. Well-defined promoter elements (e.g., TATA-box) are usually observed within 80 nucleotides of the TSS; however, the strongest ASD association was observed distally, 750 to 2000 nucleotides upstream of the TSS.CONCLUSION: We conclude that de novo mutations in the noncoding genome contribute to ASD. The clearest evidence of noncoding ASD association came from mutations at evolutionarily conserved nucleotides in the promoter region. The enrichment for transcription factor binding sites, primarily in the distal promoter, suggests that these mutations may disrupt gene transcription via their interaction with enhancer elements in the promoter region, rather than interfering with transcriptional initiation directly. Promoter regions in autism.: De novo mutations from 1902 quartet families are assigned to 55,143 annotation categories, which are each assessed for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) association by comparing mutation counts in cases and sibling controls. A de novo risk score demonstrated a noncoding contribution to ASD driven by promoter mutations, especially at sites conserved across species, in the distal promoter or targeted by transcription factors.

Variants in the SCN2A gene that disrupt the encoded neuronal sodium channel NaV1.2 are important risk factors for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), developmental delay, and infantile seizures. Variants observed in infantile seizures are predominantly missense, leading to a gain of function and increased neuronal excitability. How variants associated with ASD affect NaV1.2 function and neuronal excitability are unclear. We examined the properties of 11 ASD-associated SCN2A variants in heterologous expression systems using whole-cell voltage-clamp electrophysiology and immunohistochemistry. Resultant data were incorporated into computational models of developing and mature cortical pyramidal cells that express NaV1.2. In contrast to gain of function variants that contribute to seizure, we found that all ASD-associated variants dampened or eliminated channel function. Incorporating these electrophysiological results into a compartmental model of developing excitatory neurons demonstrated that all ASD variants, regardless of their mechanism of action, resulted in deficits in neuronal excitability. Corresponding analysis of mature neurons predicted minimal change in neuronal excitability. This functional characterization thus identifies SCN2A mutation and NaV1.2 dysfunction as the most frequently observed ASD risk factor detectable by exome sequencing and suggests that associated changes in neuronal excitability, particularly in developing neurons, may contribute to ASD etiology.

Yong Jin Heo, Chanwoong Hwa, Gang-Hee Lee, Jae-Min Park, and Joon-Yong An. Mol. Cells 2021;44:433-43. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0042

Many putative genetic factors that confer risk to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and X-linked intellectual disability (XLID), and to neuropsychiatric disorders including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia (SZ) have been identified in individuals from diverse human populations. Although there is significant aetiological heterogeneity within and between these conditions, recent data show that genetic factors contribute to their comorbidity. Many studies have identified candidate gene associations for these mental health disorders, albeit this is often done in a piecemeal fashion with little regard to the inherent molecular complexity. Here, we sought to abstract relationships from our knowledge of systems level biology to help understand the unique and common genetic drivers of these conditions. We undertook a global and systematic approach to build and integrate available data in gene networks associated with ASDs, XLID, ADHD and SZ. Complex network concepts and computational methods were used to investigate whether candidate genes associated with these conditions were related through mechanisms of gene regulation, functional protein–protein interactions, transcription factor (TF) and microRNA (miRNA) binding sites. Although our analyses show that genetic variations associated with the four disorders can occur in the same molecular pathways and functional domains, including synaptic transmission, there are patterns of variation that define significant differences between disorders. Of particular interest is DNA variations located in intergenic regions that comprise regulatory sites for TFs or miRNA. Our approach provides a hypothetical framework, which will help discovery and analysis of candidate genes associated with neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders.