Technological advances in radiation oncology are oriented towards improving treatment precision and tumor control. Among these advances, magnetic-resonance-image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) stands out, with technological advances to deliver targeted treatments adapted to a tumor’s anatomy on the day while minimizing incidental exposure to organs at risk, offering an unprecedented therapeutic advantage compared to X-ray-based IGRT delivery systems. This new technology changes the traditional workflow in radiation oncology and requires an evolution in team coordination to administer more precise treatments. Once implemented, it paves the way for newer indication for radiation therapy to safely deliver higher doses than ever before, with better preservation of healthy tissues to optimize patient outcomes. In this narrative review, we assess the technical aspects of the novel linear accelerators that can deliver MRgRT and summarize the available published experience to date, focusing on oncological results and future challenges.

Pancreatic cancer is usually associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is the main curative treatment but pancreatic operations are aggressive and new tools that help clinicians to predict surgical and prognostic outcomes are necessary. Lu et al recently published a retrospective, single centre cohort study evaluating the impact of seven nutritional and inflammatory markers in pancreatic cancer surgical patients: The albumin-to-globulin ratio, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), nutritional risk index, and the geriatric nutritional risk index. A significant correlation was found between the PNI, SII, NLR, and PLR and a hospital discharge of less than 15 days. In a univariable analysis, PNI, SII, NLR and PLR were significantly related to recurrence-free survival and, in a multivariable analysis PNI was associated with overall survival. Various meta-analyses corroborate the results in terms of prognosis but individual studies are discordant on their usefulness. Besides, the cut-off values for these markers vary significantly between studies and there are no clinical trials comparing them to identify the most relevant ones. These are limitations when implementing nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers into clinical practice and further studies are needed in order to answer these questions.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a neoplasm with a high prevalence worldwide, with a multimodal treatment that includes a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in locally advanced stages with acceptable pathological complete response (pCR) rates, this has improved with the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) reaching pCR rates up to 37% in compare with classic neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) where pCR rates of around 20–25% are achieved. However, the patient population that benefits most from this therapy has not been determined, and there is a lack of biomarkers that can predict the course of the disease. Multiple biomarkers have been studied, ranging from hematological and molecular markers by imaging technique and combinations of them, with contradictory results that prevent their use in routine clinical practice. In this review, we evaluate the most robust prognostic biomarkers to be used in clinical practice, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and emphasizing biomarker combinations and their predictive value.

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, even in the early stages, mainly due to metastatic progression. New diagnostic techniques that predict unfavorable outcomes are needed in order to improve treatment strategies. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are showing promising results as a predictive biomarker for various tumors. In this editorial we comment on the article by Zhang et al , who published the first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic value of CTCs as biomarkers in early-stage pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery. CTCs were detected in peripheral or central venous system blood, before or during surgery. Positive CTCs showed a correlation with decreased overall survival and decreased relapse-free, disease-free and progression-free survival in this meta-analysis. However, the heterogeneity was significant. The authors suggest that this result was related to the separation methods used between studies, but other differences such as the margin status or the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments used are also important to consider. CTCs may be a potential prognostic biomarker in pancreatic cancer patients, but it is necessary to compare and standardize the platforms used to isolate CTCs, to compare different biomarkers from liquid biopsy and to determine the impact on prognosis when therapeutic changes are made based on CTCs levels.

Oligometastatic prostate cancer represents a distinct biological state between localized and widely metastatic disease, characterized by a limited number of lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a key metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), enabling precise ablation of metastatic lesions with minimal toxicity. Prospective clinical trials such as SABR-COMET, STOMP, ORIOLE, RADIOSA, and EXTEND have shown that SBRT delays disease progression, prolongs progression-free survival, and postpones the need for systemic therapy, while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, methodological limitations persist, including heterogeneity in defining oligometastatic disease, variability in dosing and fractionation, and the lack of predictive biomarkers. Ongoing phase III trials aim to validate the integration of SBRT with modern systemic therapies, including next-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, to optimize clinical outcomes in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant oligometastatic prostate cancer. This review summarizes current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions for SBRT in this patient population.

This observational, descriptive, longitudinal, and prospective basket-type study (Registry #5289) prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acute toxicity of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on the first 0.35T MR-LINAC in Spain. A total of 37 patients were included between August and December 2023, primarily with prostate tumors (59.46%), followed by pancreatic tumors (32.44%). Treatment regimens typically involved extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy, with precise dose delivery verified through quality assurance measures. Acute toxicity assessment at treatment completion revealed manageable cystitis, with one case persisting at the three-month follow-up. Gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. For pancreatic tumors, daily adaptation of organ-at-risk (OAR) and gross tumor volume (GTV) was practiced, with median doses to OAR within acceptable limits. Three patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly nausea. Overall, the study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on a 0.35T MR-LINAC, especially for challenging anatomical sites like prostate and pancreatic tumors. These findings support the feasibility of MR-LINAC-based radiotherapy in delivering precise treatments with minimal toxicity, highlighting its potential for optimizing cancer treatment strategies.