Lijie Zhu

Mr. Lijie Zhu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLifu Cui
Lifu Cui
XLXiang Li
Xiang Li
CLChaoyu LI
Chaoyu LI
LZLijie Zhu
Lijie Zhu
QZQinggao Zhang
Qinggao Zhang
HLHaiyu Liu
Haiyu Liu
In this paper, the effects of the SiC phase incorporated in Ni substrate deposits on storage tank steel during electrodeposition at different current densities are explored. The microstructure, phase content, and corrosion resistance of the resulting Ni-SiC composites were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) matched with energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and an electrochemical workstation, respectively. SEM micrographs and EDS results show that at 2.5 A/dm2, the composites presented a smooth and compact structure with high SiC content, while at 1.8 or 3.2 A/dm2, it became uneven and loose in structure with low SiC content. XRD patterns showed that the nickel grain size of composites firstly increased and then decreased with the growth of the current density. Notably, the Ni-SiC composite produced at 2.5 A/dm2 possessed a higher corrosion potential (−0.507 V) and lower corrosion current density (2.439 μA/cm2), illustrating that its excellent anti-corrosion ability was superior than that of other two composites. Hence, SiC co-deposited at 2.5 A/dm2 conducted as a protective barrier and inhibited the corrosion rate against a corrosion medium of Cl− and SO42− ions. In addition, the corrosion relationship illustrated that the SiC content of Ni-SiC composite firstly increased and then decreased with the growth of the current density, while the corrosion weight loss of Ni-SiC composites firstly decreased and then increased.

3 August 2024 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLifu Cui
Lifu Cui
LZLijie Zhu
Lijie Zhu
YLYuan Lyu
Yuan Lyu
JSJiangang Sun
Jiangang Sun
WYWu Yujian
Wu Yujian
Horizontal storage tanks are integral to the petrochemical industry but pose significant risks during earthquakes, potentially causing severe secondary disasters. Current seismic designs predominantly assume rigid tank walls, which can lead to an underestimation of seismic responses. This study introduces a novel analysis method for assessing the dynamic response of flexible-walled horizontal storage tanks. By separating the liquid velocity potential into convective and impulsive components and integrating these with beam vibration theory, we developed a simplified mechanical model. A parameter analysis and dynamic response research were conducted using numerical methods. Results indicate that flexible tank walls amplify seismic responses, including liquid dynamic pressure peaks, base shear, and overturning bending moments, compared to rigid walls. Additionally, the impact of flexible walls is more pronounced in tanks with larger radii, aspect ratios, diameter–thickness ratios, and H/R ratios. These findings highlight the necessity for revised seismic design approaches that consider wall flexibility to enhance the safety and resilience of horizontal storage tanks.

25 August 2026 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLijie Zhu
Lijie Zhu
JSJiangang Sun
Jiangang Sun
Dong LiDong Li
Dong Li
RYRuitong Yang
Ruitong Yang
ZWZhiguo Wang
Zhiguo Wang
Internal wall loss in hot-fluid pipelines is difficult to monitor during operation because weak thermal perturbations are masked by global heating, axial cooling, and external heat dissipation. This study develops an external thermometry framework combining a flexible-base fiber Bragg grating (FBG) array with residual-peak morphology analysis. A closed-loop hot-water rig with five artificial wall-loss regions was tested under exposed-air and buried-soil boundaries, and a validated conjugate heat-transfer model generated 269 controlled scenarios. Experiments showed residual anomalies above measurement uncertainty, with a maximum repeatability standard deviation of approximately 0.12 °C and the clearest signals at 90–120 s after hot-water injection. Boundary conditions strongly affected observability at 115 mm and 70 °C, and the residual peak increased from about 0–1 °C in exposed air to 8–9 °C under the buried boundary. Simulations showed that defect width expanded the disturbed region from approximately 100 to 210 mm, while peak amplitude remained coupled to width and depth. Six morphology descriptors jointly estimated position, width, and depth, with mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.547, 1.647, and 0.245 mm, respectively. The method provides a recalibratable early-screening route for locating suspicious wall-loss regions before confirmatory inspection.