Zhangchao Deng

Dr. Zhangchao Deng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 October 2021 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XXXin-Dong Xiang
Xin-Dong Xiang
ZDZhangchao Deng
Zhangchao Deng
YWYou-Wei Wang
You-Wei Wang
HSHua Sun
Hua Sun
LWLi Wang
Li Wang
Lvhui SunLvhui Sun
Lvhui Sun
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of organic acids on piglet growth performance and health status. A total of 360 weanling pigs (5.3 ± 0.6 kg) were randomly allotted to 3 treatment groups with 12 replicates of 10 pigs/pen. Piglets were fed the same basal diet and given either water (control) or water plus 2.0 L/Ton organic acid (OA) blends, such as OA1 or OA2, respectively, for 7 weeks. Compared to the control, OA1 and OA2 improved growth performance and/or reduced the piglets’ diarrhea rate during the various periods and improved small intestinal morphology at days 14 and/or 49. OA1 and OA2 also increased serum CAT and SOD activities and/or T-AOC and, as expected, decreased MDA concentration. Moreover, at day 14 and/or day 49, OA1 and OA2 increased the jejunal mRNA levels of host defense peptides (PBD1, PBD2, NPG1, and NPG3) and tight junction genes (claudin-1) and decreased that of cytokines (IL-1β and IL-2). Additionally, the two acidifiers regulated the abundance of several cecum bacterial genera, including Blautia, Bulleidia, Coprococcus, Dorea, Eubacterium, Subdoligranulum, and YRC2. In conclusion, both of the organic acid blends improved piglet growth performance and health status, potentially by regulating intestinal redox homeostasis, immunity, and microflora.

29 February 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLiu Miao
Liu Miao
XXXia Xia
Xia Xia
HLHong-lin Li
Hong-lin Li
YHYu-Xuan Huang
Yu-Xuan Huang
ARAlainaa Refaie
Alainaa Refaie
Lvhui SunLvhui Sun
Lvhui Sun
Four trials were conducted to establish a protein and amino acid requirement model for layer chicks over 0–6 weeks by using the analytical factorization method. In trial 1, a total of 90 one-day-old Jing Tint 6 chicks with similar body weight were selected to determine the growth curve, carcass and feather protein deposition, and amino acid patterns of carcass and feather proteins. In trials 2 and 3, 24 seven-day-old and 24 thirty-five-day-old Jing Tint 6 chicks were selected to determine the protein maintenance requirements, amino acid pattern, and net protein utilization rate. In trial 4, 24 ten-day-old and 24 thirty-eight-day-old Jing Tint 6 chicks were selected to determine the standard terminal ileal digestibility of amino acids. The chicks were fed either a corn–soybean basal diet, a low nitrogen diet, or a nitrogen-free diet throughout the different trials. The Gompertz equation showed that there is a functional relationship between body weight and age, described as BWt(g) = 2669.317 × exp(−4.337 × exp(−0.019t)). Integration of the test results gave a comprehensive dynamic model equation that could accurately calculate the weekly protein and amino acid requirements of the layer chicks. By applying the model, it was found that the protein requirements for Jing Tint 6 chicks during the 6-week period were 21.15, 20.54, 18.26, 18.77, 17.79, and 16.51, respectively. The model-predicted amino acid requirements for Jing Tint 6 chicks during the 6-week period were as follows: Aspartic acid (0.992–1.284), Threonine (0.601–0.750), Serine (0.984–1.542), Glutamic acid (1.661–1.925), Glycine (0.992–1.227), Alanine (0.909–0.961), Valine (0.773–1.121), Cystine (0.843–1.347), Methionine (0.210–0.267), Isoleucine (0.590–0.715), Leucine (0.977–1.208), Tyrosine (0.362–0.504), Phenylalanine (0.584–0.786), Histidine (0.169–0.250), Lysine (0.3999–0.500), Arginine (0.824–1.147), Proline (1.114–1.684), and Tryptophan (0.063–0.098). In conclusion, this study constructed a dynamic model for the protein and amino acid requirements of Jing Tint 6 chicks during the brooding period, providing an important insight to improve precise feeding for layer chicks through this dynamic model calculation.

30 August 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRonghui Huang
Ronghui Huang
BZBing-Bing Zhang
Bing-Bing Zhang
JWJuan Wang
Juan Wang
WZWei Zhao
Wei Zhao
YHYu-Xuan Huang
Yu-Xuan Huang
ZDZhangchao Deng
Zhangchao Deng
This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of using sugarcane bagasse (SB) as a substitute for soybean hulls and wheat bran in the diet of pregnant sows on their reproductive performance and gut microbiota. A total of seventy-two primiparous sows were randomly divided into four treatment groups, with eighteen replicates of one sow each. The sows were fed a basal diet supplemented with 0% (CON), 5%, 10%, and 15% SB to replace soybean hulls from day 57 of gestation until the day of the end of the gestation period. The results showed that SB contains higher levels of crude fiber (42.1%) and neutral detergent fiber (81.3%) than soybean hulls, and it also exhibited the highest volumetric expansion when soaked in water (50 g expanding to 389.8 mL) compared to the other six materials we tested (vegetable scraps, soybean hulls, wheat bran, rice bran meal, rice bran, and corn DDGS). Compared with the CON, 5% SB significantly increased the litter birth weight of piglets. Meanwhile, 10% and 15% SB significantly increased the rates of constipation and reduced the contents of isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid in feces. Furthermore, 10% and 15% SB significantly disturbed gut microbial diversity with increasing Streptococcus and decreasing Prevotellaceae_NK3B31-group and Christensenellaceae_R-7-group genera in feces. Interestingly, Streptococcus had a significant negative correlation with isobutyric acid, isovaleric acid, and fecal score, while Prevotellaceae_NK3B31-group and Christensenellaceae_R-7-group had a positive correlation with them. In conclusion, our study indicates that 5% SB can be used as an equivalent substitute for soybean hulls to improve the reproductive performance of sows without affecting their gut microbiota.

18 September 2024 in Biological Trace Element Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLei Shi
Lei Shi
MRMeng-Ling Ruan
Meng-Ling Ruan
BZBing-Bing Zhang
Bing-Bing Zhang
GGGuo-Xin Gong
Guo-Xin Gong
XLXue-Wu Li
Xue-Wu Li
ZDZhangchao Deng
Zhangchao Deng

9 July 2024 in Biological Trace Element Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWShao-Qing Wang
Shao-Qing Wang
ZPZhe Peng
Zhe Peng
HSHua Sun
Hua Sun
YHYan-Ming Han
Yan-Ming Han
BZBo Zhang
Bo Zhang
ZDZhangchao Deng
Zhangchao Deng

28 April 2026 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WLWei-Cai Luo
Wei-Cai Luo
RHRong-Hui Huang
Rong-Hui Huang
MLMeng Liu
Meng Liu
JYJia-Cheng Yang
Jia-Cheng Yang
YZYu-Wei Zhao
Yu-Wei Zhao
Lvhui SunLvhui Sun
Lvhui Sun