Maize is a globally important cereal and fodder crop. Accurate monitoring of maize planting densities is vital for informed decision-making by agricultural managers. Compared to traditional manual methods for collecting crop trait parameters, approaches using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing can enhance the efficiency, minimize personnel costs and biases, and, more importantly, rapidly provide density maps of maize fields. This study involved the following steps: (1) Two UAV remote sensing-based methods were developed for monitoring maize planting densities. These methods are based on (a) ultrahigh-definition imagery combined with object detection (UHDI-OD) and (b) multispectral remote sensing combined with machine learning (Multi-ML) for the monitoring of maize planting densities. (2) The maize planting density measurements, UAV ultrahigh-definition imagery, and multispectral imagery collection were implemented at a maize breeding trial site. Experimental testing and validation were conducted using the proposed maize planting density monitoring methods. (3) An in-depth analysis of the applicability and limitations of both methods was conducted to explore the advantages and disadvantages of the two estimation models. The study revealed the following findings: (1) UHDI-OD can provide highly accurate estimation results for maize densities (R² = 0.99, RMSE = 0.09 plants/m²). (2) Multi-ML provides accurate maize density estimation results by combining remote sensing vegetation indices (VIs) and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features (R² = 0.76, RMSE = 0.67 plants/m²). (3) UHDI-OD exhibits a high sensitivity to image resolution, making it unsuitable for use with UAV remote sensing images with pixel sizes greater than 2 cm. In contrast, Multi-ML is insensitive to image resolution and the model accuracy gradually decreases as the resolution decreases.

Crop leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) and fractional vegetation cover (FVC) are crucial indicators for assessing crop health, growth development, and maturity. In contrast to the traditional manual collection of crop trait parameters, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology rapidly generates LCC and FVC maps for breeding materials, facilitating prompt assessments of maturity information. This study addresses the following research questions: (1) Can image features based on pretrained deep learning networks and ensemble learning enhance the estimation of remote sensing LCC and FVC? (2) Can the proposed adaptive normal maturity detection (ANMD) algorithm effectively monitor maize maturity based on LCC and FVC maps? We conducted the following tasks: (1) Seven phases (tassel initiation to maturity) of maize canopy orthoimages and corresponding ground-truth data for LCC and six phases of FVC using UAVs were collected. (2) Three features, namely vegetation indices (VI), texture features (TF) based on Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix, and deep features (DF), were evaluated for LCC and FVC estimation. Moreover, the potential of four single-machine learning models and three ensemble models for LCC and FVC estimation was evaluated. (3) The estimated LCC and FVC were combined with the proposed ANMD to monitor maize maturity. The research findings indicate that (1) image features extracted from pretrained deep learning networks more accurately describe crop canopy structure information, effectively eliminating saturation effects and enhancing LCC and FVC estimation accuracy. (2) Ensemble models outperform single-machine learning models in estimating LCC and FVC, providing greater precision. Remarkably, the stacking + DF strategy achieved optimal performance in estimating LCC (coefficient of determination (R²): 0.930; root mean square error (RMSE): 3.974; average absolute error (MAE): 3.096); and FVC (R²: 0.716; RMSE: 0.057; and MAE: 0.044). (3) The proposed ANMD algorithm combined with LCC and FVC maps can be used to effectively monitor maize maturity. Establishing the maturity threshold for LCC based on the wax ripening period (P5) and successfully applying it to the wax ripening-mature period (P5–P7) achieved high monitoring accuracy (overall accuracy (OA): 0.9625–0.9875; user’s accuracy: 0.9583–0.9933; and producer’s accuracy: 0.9634–1). Similarly, utilizing the ANMD algorithm with FVC also attained elevated monitoring accuracy during P5–P7 (OA: 0.9125–0.9750; UA: 0.878–0.9778; and PA: 0.9362–0.9934). This study offers robust insights for future agricultural production and breeding, offering valuable insights for the further exploration of crop monitoring technologies and methodologies.