Peripheral nerve injury disrupts the function of the peripheral nervous system, leading to sensory, motor, and autonomic deficits. While peripheral nerves possess an intrinsic regenerative capacity, complete sensory and motor recovery remains challenging due to the unpredictable nature of the healing process, which is influenced by the extent of the injury, age, and timely intervention. Recent advances in microsurgical techniques, imaging technologies, and a deeper understanding of nerve microanatomy have enhanced functional outcomes in nerve repair. Nerve injury initiates complex pathophysiological responses, including Wallerian degeneration, macrophage activation, Schwann cell dedifferentiation, and axonal sprouting. Complete nerve disruptions require surgical intervention to restore nerve continuity and function. Direct nerve repair is the gold standard for clean transections with minimal nerve gaps. However, in cases with larger nerve gaps or when direct repair is not feasible, alternatives such as autologous nerve grafting, vascularized nerve grafts, nerve conduits, allografts, and nerve transfers may be employed. Autologous nerve grafts provide excellent biocompatibility but are limited by donor site morbidity and availability. Vascularized grafts are used for large nerve gaps and poorly vascularized recipient beds, while nerve conduits serve as a promising solution for smaller gaps. Nerve transfers are utilized when neither direct repair nor grafting is possible, often involving re-routing intact regional nerves to restore function. Nerve conduits play a pivotal role in nerve regeneration by bridging nerve gaps, with significant advancements made in material composition and design. Emerging trends in nerve regeneration include the use of 3D bioprinting for personalized conduits, gene therapy for targeted growth factor delivery, and nanotechnology for nanofiber-based conduits and stem cell therapy. Advancements in molecular sciences have provided critical insights into the cellular and biochemical mechanisms underlying nerve repair, leading to targeted therapies that enhance axonal regeneration, remyelination, and functional recovery in peripheral nerve injuries. This review explores the current strategies for the therapeutic management of peripheral nerve injuries, highlighting their indications, benefits, and limitations, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on injury severity and patient factors.

Donor site morbidity remains a significant concern in free flap microsurgery, with implications that extend beyond immediate postoperative outcomes to affect patients’ long-term quality of life. This review explores the multi-faceted impact of donor site morbidity on physical, psychological, social, and occupational well-being, synthesizing findings from the existing literature. Particular attention is given to the functional limitations, sensory deficits, aesthetic outcomes, and chronic pain associated with commonly utilized free flaps. Advancements in surgical techniques, including nerve-sparing and muscle-sparing methods, as well as innovations, like perforator flaps, have demonstrated the potential to mitigate these morbidities. Furthermore, the integration of regenerative medicine strategies, such as stem cell therapy and fat grafting, and technological innovations, including virtual reality rehabilitation and biofeedback devices, has shown promise in enhancing recovery and minimizing long-term complications. Despite these advances, challenges persist in standardizing QoL assessments and optimizing donor site management. This review emphasizes the need for a holistic, patient-centered approach in reconstructive microsurgery, advocating for further research to refine current strategies, improve long-term outcomes, and develop robust tools for QoL evaluation. By addressing these gaps, reconstructive surgeons can better align surgical objectives with the comprehensive well-being of their patients.

The field of plastic surgery is continuously evolving, with faster-emerging technologies and therapeutic approaches, leading to the necessity of establishing novel protocols and solving models. Surgical decision-making in reconstructive surgery is significantly impacted by various factors, including the etiopathology of the defect, the need to restore form and function, the patient’s characteristics, compliance and expectations, and the surgeon’s expertise. A broad surgical armamentarium is currently available, comprising well-established surgical procedures, as well as emerging techniques and technologies. Reconstructive surgery paradigms guide therapeutic strategies in order to reduce morbidity, mortality and risks while maximizing safety, patient satisfaction and properly restoring form and function. The paradigms provide researchers with formulation and solving models for each unique problem, assembling complex entities composed of theoretical, practical, methodological and instrumental elements.

Radiation injuries, particularly those resulting from therapeutic or accidental exposure, present complex challenges for medical management. These injuries can manifest localized skin damage or extend to deeper tissues, presenting as various clinical entities that require treatment strategies, ranging from conservative management to complex surgical interventions. Radiation treatment constitutes a fundamental component of neoplastic management, with nearly two out of three oncological instances undergoing it as an element of their therapeutic strategy. The therapeutic approach to radiation injury consists of expanding prophylactic measures while maintaining the efficacy of treatment, such as conservative treatment or local debridement followed by reconstruction. The armamentarium of reconstructive methods available for plastic surgeons, from secondary healing to free tissue transfer, can be successfully applied to radiation injuries. However, the unique pathophysiological changes induced by radiation necessitate a careful and specialized approach for their application, considering the altered tissue characteristics and healing dynamics. The therapeutic strategy is guided by both the severity and progression of the injury, with the primary aim of restoring functionality and aesthetic aspects while simultaneously minimizing the risk of complications. This paper explores the various conditions encompassed by the term “radiation injury,” reviews both non-surgical and surgical therapeutic strategies for managing these injuries, and highlights the unique challenges associated with treating irradiated tissues within specific oncological contexts.

Recent advancements in acute burn wound therapy are transforming the management of burn injuries, with a focus on improving healing times, graft integration, and minimizing complications. However, current clinical treatments face significant challenges, including the difficulty of accurately assessing wound depth and tissue viability, which can lead to suboptimal treatment planning. Traditional closure methods often struggle with issues such as delayed wound closure, limited graft survival, inadequate tissue regeneration, and insufficient vascularization. Furthermore, managing infection and minimizing scarring remain persistent obstacles, impacting functional recovery and aesthetic outcomes. Key areas of innovation include advanced imaging techniques that enable more precise assessment of wound depth, size, and tissue viability, allowing for more accurate treatment planning. In addition, new closure strategies are being developed to accelerate wound closure, enhance graft survival, and address challenges such as tissue regeneration, vascularization, and infection prevention. These strategies aim to optimize both functional recovery and aesthetic outcomes, reducing scarring and improving the quality of life for burn patients. While promising, these emerging techniques require further research and clinical validation to refine their effectiveness and expand their accessibility. Together, these innovations represent a significant shift in acute burn care, offering the potential for more personalized, efficient, and effective treatments.

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer. While most melanomas have a discernible primary site, a small subset, approximately 3.2%, present as a metastatic disease without an identifiable primary origin, a condition known as melanoma of unknown primary (MUP). Unusual cases of primary melanoma have also been previously reported in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. MUP typically is found in lymph nodes, subcutaneous sites, and visceral organs, with hypotheses about its origin including spontaneous primary tumor regression and ectopic melanocytes. MUP presents unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to the absence of a detectable primary tumor. Understanding its genetic and molecular features, epidemiology, prognostic factors, and treatment options is crucial for optimizing patient care and outcomes in this subset of melanoma patients. We conducted an extensive literature review triggered by a case report of a patient with suspected MUP. A 51-year-old woman was transferred from another hospital where an incision was performed for a suspected superinfected hematoma of the left thigh. Since the patient showed high leukocytosis and redness and swelling of the thigh, local debridement, drainage, and excisional biopsy of the tumor mass were performed in our unit in the emergency setting, and the tumor was taken for histopathology evaluation. Intraoperatively, the mass appeared nonspecific. The permanent histopathology report established a diagnosis of melanoma, with tumor proliferation also involving lymphoid tissue, and despite broad clinical and imagistic assessments, the primary melanoma could not be identified. Clinicians must be aware of the varied clinical manifestations of malignant melanoma, especially in cases of occult melanoma where the primary site is not evident.