Peripheral nerve injury disrupts the function of the peripheral nervous system, leading to sensory, motor, and autonomic deficits. While peripheral nerves possess an intrinsic regenerative capacity, complete sensory and motor recovery remains challenging due to the unpredictable nature of the healing process, which is influenced by the extent of the injury, age, and timely intervention. Recent advances in microsurgical techniques, imaging technologies, and a deeper understanding of nerve microanatomy have enhanced functional outcomes in nerve repair. Nerve injury initiates complex pathophysiological responses, including Wallerian degeneration, macrophage activation, Schwann cell dedifferentiation, and axonal sprouting. Complete nerve disruptions require surgical intervention to restore nerve continuity and function. Direct nerve repair is the gold standard for clean transections with minimal nerve gaps. However, in cases with larger nerve gaps or when direct repair is not feasible, alternatives such as autologous nerve grafting, vascularized nerve grafts, nerve conduits, allografts, and nerve transfers may be employed. Autologous nerve grafts provide excellent biocompatibility but are limited by donor site morbidity and availability. Vascularized grafts are used for large nerve gaps and poorly vascularized recipient beds, while nerve conduits serve as a promising solution for smaller gaps. Nerve transfers are utilized when neither direct repair nor grafting is possible, often involving re-routing intact regional nerves to restore function. Nerve conduits play a pivotal role in nerve regeneration by bridging nerve gaps, with significant advancements made in material composition and design. Emerging trends in nerve regeneration include the use of 3D bioprinting for personalized conduits, gene therapy for targeted growth factor delivery, and nanotechnology for nanofiber-based conduits and stem cell therapy. Advancements in molecular sciences have provided critical insights into the cellular and biochemical mechanisms underlying nerve repair, leading to targeted therapies that enhance axonal regeneration, remyelination, and functional recovery in peripheral nerve injuries. This review explores the current strategies for the therapeutic management of peripheral nerve injuries, highlighting their indications, benefits, and limitations, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on injury severity and patient factors.

Donor site morbidity remains a significant concern in free flap microsurgery, with implications that extend beyond immediate postoperative outcomes to affect patients’ long-term quality of life. This review explores the multi-faceted impact of donor site morbidity on physical, psychological, social, and occupational well-being, synthesizing findings from the existing literature. Particular attention is given to the functional limitations, sensory deficits, aesthetic outcomes, and chronic pain associated with commonly utilized free flaps. Advancements in surgical techniques, including nerve-sparing and muscle-sparing methods, as well as innovations, like perforator flaps, have demonstrated the potential to mitigate these morbidities. Furthermore, the integration of regenerative medicine strategies, such as stem cell therapy and fat grafting, and technological innovations, including virtual reality rehabilitation and biofeedback devices, has shown promise in enhancing recovery and minimizing long-term complications. Despite these advances, challenges persist in standardizing QoL assessments and optimizing donor site management. This review emphasizes the need for a holistic, patient-centered approach in reconstructive microsurgery, advocating for further research to refine current strategies, improve long-term outcomes, and develop robust tools for QoL evaluation. By addressing these gaps, reconstructive surgeons can better align surgical objectives with the comprehensive well-being of their patients.

Recent advancements in acute burn wound therapy are transforming the management of burn injuries, with a focus on improving healing times, graft integration, and minimizing complications. However, current clinical treatments face significant challenges, including the difficulty of accurately assessing wound depth and tissue viability, which can lead to suboptimal treatment planning. Traditional closure methods often struggle with issues such as delayed wound closure, limited graft survival, inadequate tissue regeneration, and insufficient vascularization. Furthermore, managing infection and minimizing scarring remain persistent obstacles, impacting functional recovery and aesthetic outcomes. Key areas of innovation include advanced imaging techniques that enable more precise assessment of wound depth, size, and tissue viability, allowing for more accurate treatment planning. In addition, new closure strategies are being developed to accelerate wound closure, enhance graft survival, and address challenges such as tissue regeneration, vascularization, and infection prevention. These strategies aim to optimize both functional recovery and aesthetic outcomes, reducing scarring and improving the quality of life for burn patients. While promising, these emerging techniques require further research and clinical validation to refine their effectiveness and expand their accessibility. Together, these innovations represent a significant shift in acute burn care, offering the potential for more personalized, efficient, and effective treatments.

The Buschke–Löwenstein tumor (BLT), also known as giant condyloma acuminatum, is a rare, exophytic tumor, arising from pre-existing warty lesions associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, particularly strains 6 and 11, which are considered to have low oncogenic potential. BLT presents as a large, cauliflower-like growth typically affecting the penis, vulva, vagina, perineum, scrotum, anus, and perianal area. Despite being a benign lesion, BLT is locally aggressive with a high recurrence rate, and can potentially undergo malignant transformation into squamous cell carcinoma, contributing to an overall mortality rate of 20–30%. The primary treatment is complete surgical excision with wide margins, frequently requiring complex reconstructive techniques for defect coverage. We report on a 68-year-old patient, with multiple comorbidities, who presented with a two-year history of a large exophytic tumor in the genital region, affecting the penis, along with progressive erectile dysfunction and urinary problems. The tumor was surgically excised with oncological safety margins, and reconstruction was performed using advancement and rotation flaps from the scrotum and intact penile skin. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of Giant Condyloma (Buschke–Löwenstein tumor), showing acanthosis, papillomatosis, parakeratosis, and koilocytic cell collections, with positive immunohistochemical staining for p16, p63, and ki67. Postoperatively, the patient had a good clinical outcome and a complete surgical cure. This case highlights the critical need for timely intervention and comprehensive management strategies in treating giant condyloma, given its potential for local invasion and substantial impacts on patient quality of life. Early diagnosis and thorough surgical excision are crucial for effective management and to reduce the high recurrence, morbidity and malignant transformation risk associated with this condition.

Background and Objectives: Hand septic arthritis is a potentially debilitating condition that can significantly affect patient functionality and quality of life. Understanding the demographic, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of this condition is crucial for its effective treatment and management. This study aimed to analyze the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with hand septic arthritis, to identify common microbial pathogens, and to evaluate the impact of various factors on clinical course and treatment outcomes. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study examined patients diagnosed with septic arthritis of the hand, focusing on their demographic data, clinical presentation, causative organisms, treatment methods, and outcomes. Data on age, sex, cause of infection, affected sites, surgical interventions, microbiological findings, and patient outcomes were also collected. Results: This study found a higher prevalence of septic arthritis in males and identified bite as the predominant cause. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen. A large number of patients did not exhibit bacterial growth, and bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the outcome. Outcomes were statistically influenced by the timing of medical presentation and the presence of comorbidities. Conclusions: Early diagnosis and intervention are critical for effective management of hand septic arthritis. This study underscores the need for a comprehensive approach that considers patient demographic and clinical characteristics to optimize treatment outcomes. Awareness and preventive measures are essential to reduce the incidence and severity of this condition.

Background: Pressure injuries are localized areas of tissue damage or necrosis that occur when pressure is applied to the skin for prolonged periods, often over bony prominences, often the sacrum, heels, ischial tuberosities, and greater trochanters. The pathophysiology is complex, involving a combination of mechanical forces, ischemia, and tissue hypoxia. Methods: We conducted a 2-year retrospective study aiming to assess the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and management of pressure injuries in patients admitted to an emergency hospital who underwent a plastic surgery examination. Results: This study included 176 patients with clinically diagnosed pressure ulcers, with findings showing 28.52% of cases as stage III and 35.57% as stage IV. Common sites included the sacrum (40.94%), ischium (15.1%), and heel (14.43%). The median patient age was 76 years, with 47.15% between 60 and 80 years and 36.93% ≥ 80 years, often presenting with comorbidities increasing the risk of pressure injuries, such as cardiovascular disease (71.59%), diabetes (18.18%) and obesity (9.66%). Important risk factors included neurological diseases (46.02%), spinal cord injuries (14.7%), and nutritional deficiencies, as indicated by anemia (10.43g/dL; 95% CI [10.04; 10.82]), low serum albumin (2.56 g/dL; 95% CI [2.43; 2.69]) and proteins (5.54 g/dL; 95% CI [5.34; 5.73]). Mortality was significant, at 36.93%, with 23.3% occurring within the first 7 days of hospitalization due to the patients’ critical condition. Decision-making for surgical intervention considered the patient’s general status, comorbidities, and ulcer severity. Surgical treatment consisted of seriate debridement, negative pressure vacuum therapy, and/or coverage using skin grafting, local advancement, or rotation flaps. Conclusions: The key question for a plastic surgeon to consider is how pressure ulcers should be managed. Various debridement and covering techniques should be tailored to the wound’s characteristics, considering patient comorbidities and general health condition.