Kevin Hamilton

Dr. Kevin Hamilton

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

47Years (1980-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2001 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBM. P. Baldwin
M. P. Baldwin
LGL. J. Gray
L. J. Gray
TDT. J. Dunkerton
T. J. Dunkerton
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
PHP. H. Haynes
P. H. Haynes
MTM. Takahashi
M. Takahashi
The quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) dominates the variability of the equatorial stratosphere (∼16–50 km) and is easily seen as downward propagating easterly and westerly wind regimes, with a variable period averaging approximately 28 months. From a fluid dynamical perspective, the QBO is a fascinating example of a coherent, oscillating mean flow that is driven by propagating waves with periods unrelated to that of the resulting oscillation. Although the QBO is a tropical phenomenon, it affects the stratospheric flow from pole to pole by modulating the effects of extratropical waves. Indeed, study of the QBO is inseparable from the study of atmospheric wave motions that drive it and are modulated by it. The QBO affects variability in the mesosphere near 85 km by selectively filtering waves that propagate upward through the equatorial stratosphere, and may also affect the strength of Atlantic hurricanes. The effects of the QBO are not confined to atmospheric dynamics. Chemical constituents, such as ozone, water vapor, and methane, are affected by circulation changes induced by the QBO. There are also substantial QBO signals in many of the shorter‐lived chemical constituents. Through modulation of extratropical wave propagation, the QBO has an effect on the breakdown of the wintertime stratospheric polar vortices and the severity of high‐latitude ozone depletion. The polar vortex in the stratosphere affects surface weather patterns, providing a mechanism for the QBO to have an effect at the Earth's surface. As more data sources (e.g., wind and temperature measurements from both ground‐based systems and satellites) become available, the effects of the QBO can be more precisely assessed. This review covers the current state of knowledge of the tropical QBO, its extratropical dynamical effects, chemical constituent transport, and effects of the QBO in the troposphere (∼0–16 km) and mesosphere (∼50–100 km). It is intended to provide a broad overview of the QBO and its effects to researchers outside the field, as well as a source of information and references for specialists. The history of research on the QBO is discussed only briefly, and the reader is referred to several historical review papers. The basic theory of the QBO is summarized, and tutorial references are provided.

1 November 2011 in Monthly Weather Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZChunxi Zhang
Chunxi Zhang
YWYuqing Wang
Yuqing Wang
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
A modified Tiedtke cumulus parameterization (CP) scheme has been implemented into the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting model (ARW-WRF) to improve the representation of marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds over the southeast Pacific (SEP). A full month simulation for October 2006 was performed by using the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) final analysis (FNL) as both the initial and lateral boundary conditions and the observed sea surface temperature (SST). The model simulation was compared with satellite observations and with results from an intense ship-based campaign of balloon soundings during 16–20 October 2006 at 20°S, 85°W. The model with the modified Tiedtke scheme successfully captured the main features of the MBL structure and low clouds over the SEP, including the geographical distribution of MBL clouds, the cloud regime transition, and the vertical structure of the MBL. The model simulation was repeated with the various CP schemes currently provided as standard options in ARW-WRF. The simulations with other CP schemes failed to reproduce the geographical distribution of cloud fraction and the observed cloud regime transition, and displayed an MBL too shallow compared to observations. The improved simulation with the modified Tiedtke scheme can be attributed to a more active parameterized shallow convection with the modified Tiedtke scheme than with the other CP schemes tested, which played a critical role in lifting the inversion base and the low cloud layer. Results from additional sensitivity experiments employing different planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes demonstrated that the basic feature of the MBL structure and low clouds over the SEP were not particularly sensitive to the choice of the PBL scheme.

15 March 2007 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAH. Annamalai
H. Annamalai
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
KSK. R. Sperber
K. R. Sperber
In this paper the extensive integrations produced for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) are used to examine the relationship between ENSO and monsoons at interannual and decadal time scales. The study begins with an analysis of the monsoon simulation in the twentieth-century integrations. Six of the 18 models were found to have a reasonably realistic representation of monsoon precipitation climatology. For each of these six models SST and anomalous precipitation evolution along the equatorial Pacific during El Niño events display considerable differences when compared to observations. Out of these six models only four [Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Climate Model versions 2.0 and 2.1 (GFDL_CM_2.0 and GFDL_CM_2.1), Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) model, and Max Planck Institute ECHAM5 (MPI_ECHAM5)] exhibit a robust ENSO–monsoon contemporaneous teleconnection, including the known inverse relationship between ENSO and rainfall variations over India. Lagged correlations between the all-India rainfall (AIR) index and Niño-3.4 SST reveal that three models represent the timing of the teleconnection, including the spring predictability barrier, which is manifested as the transition from positive to negative correlations prior to the monsoon onset. Furthermore, only one of these three models (GFDL_CM_2.1) captures the observed phase lag with the strongest anticorrelation of SST peaking 2–3 months after the summer monsoon, which is partially attributable to the intensity of the simulated El Niño itself. The authors find that the models that best capture the ENSO–monsoon teleconnection are those that correctly simulate the timing and location of SST and diabatic heating anomalies in the equatorial Pacific and the associated changes to the equatorial Walker circulation during El Niño events. The strength of the AIR-Niño-3.4 SST correlation in the model runs waxes and wanes to some degree on decadal time scales. The overall magnitude and time scale for this decadal modulation in most of the models is similar to that seen in observations. However, there is little consistency in the phase among the realizations, suggesting a lack of predictability of the decadal modulation of the monsoon–ENSO relationship. The analysis was repeated for each of the four models using results from integrations in which the atmospheric CO2 concentration was raised to twice preindustrial values. From these “best” models in the double CO2 simulations there are increases in both the mean monsoon rainfall over the Indian subcontinent (by 5%–25%) and in its interannual variability (5%–10%). For each model the ENSO–monsoon correlation in the global warming runs is very similar to that in the twentieth-century runs, suggesting that the ENSO–monsoon connection will not weaken as global climate warms. This result, though plausible, needs to be taken with some caution because of the diversity in the simulation of ENSO variability in the coupled models that have been analyzed. Implications of the present results for monsoon prediction are discussed.

27 December 2002 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorgiy Stenchikov
Georgiy Stenchikov
ARAlan Robock
Alan Robock
VRV. Ramaswamy
V. Ramaswamy
MSM. Daniel Schwarzkopf
M. Daniel Schwarzkopf
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
SRS. Ramachandran
S. Ramachandran

11 April 2006 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorgiy Stenchikov
Georgiy Stenchikov
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
RSRonald J. Stouffer
Ronald J. Stouffer
ARAlan Robock
Alan Robock
VRV. Ramaswamy
V. Ramaswamy
HGHans‐F. Graf
Hans‐F. Graf

23 September 2016 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Scott OspreyScott Osprey
Scott Osprey
NBNeal Butchart
Neal Butchart
JKJeff R. Knight
Jeff R. Knight
ASAdam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife
KHKevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton
CZChunxi Zhang
Chunxi Zhang
One of the most repeatable phenomena seen in the atmosphere, the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) between prevailing eastward and westward wind jets in the equatorial stratosphere (approximately 16 to 50 kilometers altitude), was unexpectedly disrupted in February 2016. An unprecedented westward jet formed within the eastward phase in the lower stratosphere and cannot be accounted for by the standard QBO paradigm based on vertical momentum transport. Instead, the primary cause was waves transporting momentum from the Northern Hemisphere. Seasonal forecasts did not predict the disruption, but analogous QBO disruptions are seen very occasionally in some climate simulations. A return to more typical QBO behavior within the next year is forecast, although the possibility of more frequent occurrences of similar disruptions is projected for a warming climate.