A mix design, using a mixture of sand and mine tailings as aggregates, was selected to produce a cement-based 3D printing material suitable for building purposes. Different dosage rates of mine tailings, water, superplasticizers, and accelerators were added to the mixture with the end of looking for the optimum strength, workability and buildability. The term buildability includes aspects such as pumpability and printability. Different tests were carried out in order to compare homogeneous material strength with printed material strength, to evaluate the bonding strength between filaments, and to establish the relationship between fresh behaviour and buildability for printing applications. Finally, a mixture with 20% of recycled materials demonstrated its ability to be used as concrete printing material in the construction industry in the frame of circular economy concept.

Uniaxial compressive strength is a variable necessary for adequately characterizing a material’s mechanical properties. However, a specimen’s geometric deviations and elastic properties may lead to undesirable stress states, which cause strong discrepancies between the results of the uniaxial compression test and its theoretical foundations. While geometric deviations may cause non-uniform contact between the platen and the specimen, elastic properties can provoke severe end effects that disturb the local stress field near the points of contact. To address how the relative stiffness between the platen and the specimen influences the induced stress field, numerical simulations considering the stiffness ratios $E_p/E_s=3$, $E_p/E_s=1$ and $E_p/E_s=0.05$ were performed. Subsequently, these results were employed to establish the relation between relative stiffness and specimen failure patterns in brittle materials, particularly in three different rocks. The results prove that the platen stiffness must be accurately selected to match that of the tested material, in order to avoid undesirable local stress fields near the point of contact and to induce homogeneous uniaxial compression that guarantees reliable uniaxial compressive strength characterization. Furthermore, the brittle failure patterns reported in previous studies were correlated with the induced stress fields inside the specimen depending on its platen stiffness, allowing the validity of the test results to be verified based on a simple visual inspection.

Uniaxial compressive strength is an essential mechanical parameter to adequately characterize any given material. Numerous standards have been developed to guarantee reliable testing execution, as well as the repeatability of results. In this sense, not only the geometric dimensions and tolerances of both the platen and the specimen have been prescribed, but also the testing parameters, such as the load application speed. However, all these recommendations are based on the assumption that the stresses are uniformly distributed across the contact interface between the platen and the specimen. Nevertheless, this is major elastic simplification that allows for obtaining a handy and useful formula to determine the compressive strength, but this strongly deviates the theoretical foundations from the actual experimental reality. Experimental and numerical research to determine the influence of relative stiffness between the specimen and the platen on the stress distribution generated during the execution of the uniaxial compressive test is performed. The results prove that the stresses are not uniformly distributed across the contact when the platen material is significantly stiffer or softer (less stiff) than that of the tested specimen, and additionally, an undesired triaxial stress field is induced inside the specimen. For these reasons, the use of platens with a similar stiffness to that of the specimen is strongly recommended, as it allows for the uniform distribution of the compressive contact stresses and minimizes the influence of the triaxial stress field.

One year on from the outbreak of the global COVID-19 pandemic, EU policies have defined recovery instruments that enhance the transition towards a more circular economy, making European industries more sustainable, resilient, digital and innovative. The underground work industry is no exception and must crystallise the trends in innovation that have been developing in recent years, which will undoubtedly contribute to achieving better safety and efficiency parameters in tunnel construction, with the economic impact that this means. This work shows different innovation strategies along the design and construction of the Arnotegi tunnel, as part of the extension works of the Bilbao South Metropolitan Bypass. These strategies have been the implementation of the BIM methodology in the underground works, the use of environmental sensors and the optimisation of the shotcrete placement and the positioning of machinery inside the tunnel. The implementation of these strategies has allowed improved collaboration between agents and a time saving of 6.60% with respect to the initially planned deadline.

There is no doubt that additive manufacturing (AM) with mortars presents an opportunity within the framework of a circular economy that should not be overlooked. The concepts of reduce, reuse, and recycle are fully aligned with this technology. One of the less explored possibilities is the utilisation of mining tailings as aggregates in printing mortars. This idea not only incorporates the concept of recycling but also contributes to a reduction in the production of potentially hazardous waste that would otherwise require storage in dams, thereby decreasing long-term environmental risks and improving the management of mineral resources. We employed a mortar composed of 12.5% material derived from mining tailings to highlight aspects of AM that are typically not subject to analysis, such as the necessity of considering contact interfaces between layers in structural design, the stackability of layers during the construction process, and the behaviour under fire and seismic events, which must be taken into account during the operational phase. Without aiming for exhaustiveness, we conducted a series of tests and computational modelling to show the significance of these factors, with the intention of drawing the attention of different stakeholders—including construction companies, regulatory authorities, standardisation agencies, insurers, and end-users.