Tommaso Giandini

Dr. Tommaso Giandini

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEster Orlandi
Ester Orlandi
TGTommaso Giandini
Tommaso Giandini
EIEva Iannacone
Eva Iannacone
EPElena De Ponti
Elena De Ponti
MCMauro Carrara
Mauro Carrara
EPEmanuele Pignoli
Emanuele Pignoli

1 August 2017 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCarla Sini
Carla Sini
BCBarbara Noris Chiorda
Barbara Noris Chiorda
PGPietro Gabriele
Pietro Gabriele
GSGiuseppe Sanguineti
Giuseppe Sanguineti
SMSara Morlino
Sara Morlino
CCCesare Cozzarini
Cesare Cozzarini

1 December 2017 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMauro Carrara
Mauro Carrara
DCDavide Cusumano
Davide Cusumano
TGTommaso Giandini
Tommaso Giandini
CTChiara Tenconi
Chiara Tenconi
EMEster Mazzarella
Ester Mazzarella
EPEmanuele Pignoli
Emanuele Pignoli

12 February 2016 in Tumori Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGiulia Marvaso
Giulia Marvaso
BJBarbara A. Jereczek-Fossa
Barbara A. Jereczek-Fossa
BVBarbara Vischioni
Barbara Vischioni
DCDelia Ciardo
Delia Ciardo
TGTommaso Giandini
Tommaso Giandini
RORoberto Orecchia
Roberto Orecchia
Purpose: Definition of the optimal treatment schedule for high-risk prostate cancer is under debate. A combination of photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on pelvis with a carbon ion boost might be the optimal treatment scheme to escalate the dose on prostate and deliver curative dose with respect to normal tissue and quality of dose distributions. In fact, carbon ion beams offer the advantage to deliver hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) using a significantly smaller number of fractions compared to conventional RT without increasing risks of late effects. Methods: This study is a prospective phase II clinical trial exploring safety and feasibility of a mixed beam scheme of carbon ion prostate boost followed by photon IMRT on pelvis. The study is designed to enroll 65 patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer at 3 different oncologic hospitals: Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, and Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of safety and feasibility with acute toxicity scored up to 1 month after the end of RT. Secondary endpoints are treatment early (3 months after the end of RT) and long-term tolerability, quality of life, and efficacy. Results: The study is not yet recruiting; in silico studies are ongoing and we expect to start recruitment by 2017. Conclusions: The present clinical trial aims at improving the current treatment for high-risk prostate cancer, evaluating safety and feasibility of a new RT mixed-beam scheme including photons and carbon ions. Encouraging results are coming from carbon ion facilities worldwide on the treatment of different tumors including prostate cancers. Carbon ions combine physical properties allowing for high dose conformity and advantageous radiobiological characteristics. The proposed mixed beam treatment has the advantage to combine a photon high conformity standard of care IMRT phase with a hypofractionated carbon ion RT boost delivered in a short overall treatment time.

6 August 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnna Cavallo
Anna Cavallo
NINicola Alessandro Iacovelli
Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli
NFNadia Facchinetti
Nadia Facchinetti
TRTiziana Rancati
Tiziana Rancati
SASalvatore Alfieri
Salvatore Alfieri
EOEster Orlandi
Ester Orlandi
Background: Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent adverse effects of head and neck cancer treatment, and it could seriously affect patients’ qualities of life. It results primarily from damage to the salivary glands, but its onset and severity may also be influenced by other patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related factors. We aimed to build and validate a predictive model for acute salivary dysfunction (aSD) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients by combining clinical and dosimetric factors. Methods: A cohort of consecutive NPC patients treated curatively with IMRT and chemotherapy at 70 Gy (2–2.12 Gy/fraction) were utilised. Parotid glands (cPG, considered as a single organ) and the oral cavity (OC) were selected as organs-at-risk. The aSD was assessed at baseline and weekly during RT, grade ≥ 2 aSD chosen as the endpoint. Dose-volume histograms were reduced to the Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD). Dosimetric and clinical/treatment features selected via LASSO were inserted into a multivariable logistic model. Model validation was performed on two cohorts of patients with prospective aSD, and scored using the same schedule/scale: a cohort (NPC_V) of NPC patients (as in model training), and a cohort of mixed non-NPC head and neck cancer patients (HNC_V). Results: The model training cohort included 132 patients. Grade ≥ 2 aSD was reported in 90 patients (68.2%). Analyses resulted in a 4-variables model, including doses of up to 98% of cPG (cPG_D98%, OR = 1.04), EUD to OC with n = 0.05 (OR = 1.11), age (OR = 1.08, 5-year interval) and smoking history (OR = 1.37, yes vs. no). Calibration was good. The NPC_V cohort included 38 patients, with aSD scored in 34 patients (89.5%); the HNC_V cohort included 93 patients, 77 with aSD (92.8%). As a general observation, the incidence of aSD was significantly different in the training and validation populations (p = 0.01), thus impairing calibration-in-the-large. At the same time, the effect size for the two dosimetric factors was confirmed. Discrimination was also satisfactory in both cohorts: AUC was 0.73, and 0.68 in NPC_V and HNC_V cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: cPG D98% and the high doses received by small OC volumes were found to have the most impact on grade ≥ 2 acute xerostomia, with age and smoking history acting as a dose-modifying factor. Findings on the development population were confirmed in two prospectively collected validation populations.

1 November 2014 in Future Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEster Orlandi
Ester Orlandi
STSilvia Takanen
Silvia Takanen
TGTommaso Giandini
Tommaso Giandini
EIEva Iannacone
Eva Iannacone
WFWalter Fontanella
Walter Fontanella
CFCarlo Fallai
Carlo Fallai
To evaluate technical issues and clinical outcomes after postoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in two cases of malignant lacrimal gland cancer. Patients were treated by postoperative VMAT and post-treatment clinical outcomes were followed-up to 18 months. Dosimetric results were acceptable and acute toxicity was manageable in both patients. No evidence of disease was found at latest follow-up. One patient underwent corneal transplant for central corneal ulceration, experiencing reduction of visual acuity. Postoperative VMAT for treatment of lacrimal gland tumors offers improved outcome, with manageable side effects. In the context of photon beam radiotherapy, VMAT emerged as a valuable treatment option for these malignant tumors.