Andrea (Andy) Leigh

Dr. Andrea (Andy) Leigh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2011 in Functional Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAdrienne B. Nicotra
Adrienne B. Nicotra
ALAndrea (Andy) Leigh
Andrea (Andy) Leigh
CBC. Kevin Boyce
C. Kevin Boyce
CJCynthia S. Jones
Cynthia S. Jones
KNKarl J. Niklas
Karl J. Niklas
HTHirokazu Tsukaya
Hirokazu Tsukaya
Angiosperm leaves manifest a remarkable diversity of shapes that range from developmental sequences within a shoot and within crown response to microenvironment to variation among species within and between communities and among orders or families. It is generally assumed that because photosynthetic leaves are critical to plant growth and survival, variation in their shape reflects natural selection operating on function. Several non-mutually exclusive theories have been proposed to explain leaf shape diversity. These include: thermoregulation of leaves especially in arid and hot environments, hydraulic constraints, patterns of leaf expansion in deciduous species, biomechanical constraints, adaptations to avoid herbivory, adaptations to optimise light interception and even that leaf shape variation is a response to selection on flower form. However, the relative importance, or likelihood, of each of these factors is unclear. Here we review the evolutionary context of leaf shape diversification, discuss the proximal mechanisms that generate the diversity in extant systems, and consider the evidence for each the above hypotheses in the context of the functional significance of leaf shape. The synthesis of these broad ranging areas helps to identify points of conceptual convergence for ongoing discussion and integrated directions for future research.

7 January 2018 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJohn E. Drake
John E. Drake
MTMark G Tjoelker
Mark G Tjoelker
AVAngelica Vårhammar
Angelica Vårhammar
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn
PRPeter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich
CBCraig V. M. Barton
Craig V. M. Barton

27 December 2016 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAndrea (Andy) Leigh
Andrea (Andy) Leigh
SSS. Sevanto
S. Sevanto
JCJ.D. Close
J.D. Close
ANA.B. Nicotra
A.B. Nicotra

28 August 2021 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rachael Helene NolanRachael Helene Nolan
Rachael Helene Nolan
LCLuke Collins
Luke Collins
ALAndrea (Andy) Leigh
Andrea (Andy) Leigh
MOMark Ooi
Mark Ooi
TCTim Curran
Tim Curran
RBRoss Bradstock
Ross Bradstock

30 September 2021 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDaniel Falster
Daniel Falster
RGRachael Gallagher
Rachael Gallagher
EWElizabeth H. Wenk
Elizabeth H. Wenk
IWIan J. Wright
Ian J. Wright
DIDony Indiarto
Dony Indiarto
KZKasia Ziemińska
Kasia Ziemińska
We introduce the AusTraits database - a compilation of values of plant traits for taxa in the Australian flora (hereafter AusTraits). AusTraits synthesises data on 448 traits across 28,640 taxa from field campaigns, published literature, taxonomic monographs, and individual taxon descriptions. Traits vary in scope from physiological measures of performance (e.g. photosynthetic gas exchange, water-use efficiency) to morphological attributes (e.g. leaf area, seed mass, plant height) which link to aspects of ecological variation. AusTraits contains curated and harmonised individual- and species-level measurements coupled to, where available, contextual information on site properties and experimental conditions. This article provides information on version 3.0.2 of AusTraits which contains data for 997,808 trait-by-taxon combinations. We envision AusTraits as an ongoing collaborative initiative for easily archiving and sharing trait data, which also provides a template for other national or regional initiatives globally to fill persistent gaps in trait knowledge.

1 February 2012 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAndrea (Andy) Leigh
Andrea (Andy) Leigh
SSS. Sevanto
S. Sevanto
MBMarilyn Ball
Marilyn Ball
JCJ. D. Close
J. D. Close
DED. S. Ellsworth
D. S. Ellsworth
SVS. Vogel
S. Vogel
• Transient lulls in air movement are rarely measured, but can cause leaf temperature to rise rapidly to critical levels. The high heat capacity of thick leaves can damp this rapid change in temperature. However, little is known about the extent to which increased leaf thickness can reduce thermal damage, or how thick leaves would need to be to have biological significance. We evaluated quantitatively the contribution of small increases in leaf thickness to the reduction in thermal damage during critically low wind speeds under desert conditions. • We employed a numerical model to investigate the effect of thickness relative to transpiration, absorptance and leaf size on damage avoidance. We used measured traits and thermotolerance thresholds of real leaves to calculate the leaf temperature response to naturally occurring variable low wind speed. • Our results demonstrated that an increase in thickness of only fractions of a millimetre can prevent excursions to damaging high temperatures. This damping effect of increased thickness was greatest when other means of reducing leaf temperature (transpiration, reflectance or reduced size) were lacking. • For perennial desert flora, we propose that increased leaf thickness is important in decreasing the incidence of extreme heat stress and, in some species, in enhancing long‐term survival.