Prosthetic materials available for pediatric pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) lack growth potential, inevitably leading to a size mismatch. Small intestine submucosa–derived extracellular matrix (SIS-ECM) has been suggested to possess regenerative properties. We aimed to investigate its function and potential to increase in size as a PVR in a piglet. An SIS-ECM trileaflet valved conduit was designed. Hanford minipigs, n = 6 (10-34 kg), underwent PVR with an intended survival of six months, with monthly echocardiograms evaluating valve size and function. The conduit was excised for histologic analysis. Of the six, one was sacrificed at three months for midterm analysis, and one at month 3 due to endocarditis. The remaining four constituted the study cohort. The piglet weight increased by 186% (19.56 ± 10.22 kg to 56.00 ± 7.87 kg). Conduit size increased by 30% (1.42 ± 0.14 cm to 1.84 ± 0.14 cm; P < .01). The native right ventricular outflow tract increased by 43% and the native pulmonary artery by 84%, resulting in a peak gradient increase from 10.08 ± 2.47 mm Hg to 36.25 ± 18.80 mm Hg (P = .03). Additionally, all valves developed at least moderate regurgitation. Conduit histology showed advanced remodeling with myofibroblast infiltration, neovascularization, and endothelialization. The leaflets remodeled beginning at the base with the leaflet edge being less cellular. In addition to the known endocarditis, bacterial colonies were discovered within a leaflet in another. The SIS-ECM valved conduit implanted into a piglet demonstrated cellular infiltration with vascular remodeling and an increase in diameter. Conduit stenosis was a result of slower rates of size increase than native tissue. Suboptimal leaflet performance requires design modifications.

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has detrimental effects on recipients following lung transplantation. Here, we determined the contemporary trends of PGD in a national database, factors associated with the development of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) and ex vivo lung perfusion’s (EVLP) effect on this harmful postoperative complication. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2015 to 2023, and recipients were stratified into No-PGD, PGD1/2, or PGD3. The groups were analyzed with comparative statistics, and survival was determined with Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with increased mortality. PGD3 recipients were then stratified based on EVLP use prior to transplantation, and a 3:1 propensity match was performed to determine outcomes following transplantation. Finally, logistic regression models based on select criteria were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of PGD3 and mortality within 1 year. Results: A total of 21.4% of patients were identified as having PGD3 following lung transplant. Those with PGD3 suffered significantly worse perioperative morbidity, mortality, and had worse long-term survival. PGD3 was also independently associated with increased mortality. Matched EVLP PGD3 recipients had significantly higher use of ECMO postoperatively; however, they did not suffer other significant morbidity or mortality as compared to PGD3 recipients without EVLP use. Importantly, EVLP use prior to transplantation was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of PGD3 development, while having no significant association with early mortality. Conclusions: EVLP is associated with decreased PGD3 development, and further optimization of this technology is necessary to expand the donor pool.

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the association of increasing ischemic times in recipients who receive lungs evaluated by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and their association with outcomes following lung transplantation.Methods: Lung transplant recipients who received an allograft evaluated by EVLP were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database from 2016–2023. Recipients were stratified into three groups based on total ischemic time (TOT): short TOT (STOT, 0 to to <14 h), and long TOT (LTOT, +14 h). The groups were assessed with comparative statistics and Kaplan–Meier methods. A Cox regression was created to determine the association of ischemic time in EVLP donors and long‐term mortality.Results: Recipients in the LTOT group had significantly longer length of stay and post‐operative extracorporeal membrane use at 72 h (p < 0.05 for both). Additionally, they had nonsignificant increases in rate of stroke (4.7%, p = 0.05) and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3, 27.5%, p = 0.082). However, there was no significant difference in hospital mortality or mid‐term survival (p > 0.05 for both). On multivariable analysis, ischemic time was not associated with increased mortality whereas increasing recipient age, preoperative ECMO use and donation after circulatory death donors were (p < 0.05 for all).Conclusions: If EVLP technology is available, under certain circumstances, surgeons should not be dissuaded from using an allograft with extended ischemic time.

Background: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) conducted outside of the transplant center has increased in recent years to mitigate its limitation by resources and expertise. We sought to evaluate EVLP performed at transplant centers and externally.Methods: Lung transplant recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Recipients were then stratified into two groups based where they were perfused: Transplant Program (TP) or External Perfusion Centers (EPC). The groups were assessed with comparative statistics and long‐term survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier method. The groups were then 1:1 propensity and this process was repeated.Results: EPC use was generally restricted to the Southern United States. Following matching, there were no significant differences in post‐operative outcomes to include post‐operative stroke, dialysis, airway dehiscence, ECMO use, ventilator use or incidence of primary graft dysfunction Grade 3. Adjusted 3‐year survival was 68.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 60.9%–77.9%) for the TP group and 67.6% (95% CI: 61.0%–74.9%) for the EPC group (p = 0.69). In allografts with extended ischemia (14+ h), those in the TP group had significantly longer length of stay, prolonged ventilation and treated rejection in the 1st year, though no significant difference in mid‐term survival (p = 0.66).Conclusion: EVLP performed at an EPC can be carried out with results and survival similar to allografts undergoing EVLP at a TP. EPCs will extend the valuable resource of EVLP to lung transplant programs without the resources to perform EVLP.

Background.: Outcomes in heart transplantation are affected by a variety of variables and patient factors. However, the impact of circadian rhythms, gene expression, and transcription remain underexplored. We thus evaluated the potential role of donor heart cross-clamp times on short-term and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation. Methods.: A total of 31 713 heart transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were first stratified on the basis of time of donor procurement: 12 am to 12 pm or 12 pm to 12 am. To evaluate a possible effect of circadian rhythms, donor time was further divided into 5 groups based on preclinical data: 4 am to 8 am; 8 am to 11 am; 11 am to 5 pm; 5 pm to 10 pm; 10 pm to 4 am. Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results.: Patients who received hearts recovered between 12 am and 12 pm had significantly higher survival than those who received hearts recovered between 12 pm and 12 am. This survival difference was observed in both unadjusted (P = 0.002) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97; P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, the survival difference among the 5 groups was insignificant (P = 0.07). Following adjustment, the periods of 11 am to 5 pm (HR: 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.012), 5 pm to 10 pm (HR: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002), and 10 pm to 4 am (HR: 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = 0.034), were all independently associated with increased long-term mortality. Notably, the time of 8 am to 11 am was not associated with a change in survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.14; P = 0.3). Conclusions.: Given the independent association of donor timing and survival after adjustment in a large national cohort, further investigation into the role of donor circadian rhythm and donor procurement time is warranted in preclinical and clinical studies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of this observation could potentially lead to the development of effective treatments and donor procurement processes that prepare the organs for transplantation in a better condition.