Continuous improvement in the clinical performance of neonatal intensive care units (NICU) depends on the use of locally relevant, reliable data. However, neonatal databases with these characteristics are typically unavailable in NICUs using paper-based records, while in those using electronic records, the inaccuracy of data and the inability to customize commercial data systems limit their usability for quality improvement or research purposes. We describe the characteristics and uses of a simple, neonatologist-centered data system that has been successfully maintained for 30 years, with minimal resources and serving multiple purposes, including quality improvement, administrative, research support and educational functions. Structurally, our system comprises customized paper and electronic components, while key functional aspects include the attending-based recording of diagnoses, integration into clinical workflows, multilevel data accuracy and validation checks, and periodic reporting on both data quality and NICU performance results. We provide examples of data validation methods and trends observed over three decades, and discuss essential elements for the successful implementation of this system. This database is reliable and easily maintained; it can be developed from simple paper-based forms or used to supplement the functionality and end-user customizability of existing electronic medical records. This system should be readily adaptable to NICUs in either high- or limited-resource environments.

Background/Objectives: Pneumothorax is a common complication of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, which is decreased by surfactant therapy. Rescue administration of surfactant in neonates with severe RDS complicated by pneumothorax requires management of the pneumothorax to optimize surfactant distribution while avoiding positive pressure ventilation to minimize iatrogenic exacerbation of the air leak. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our center’s experience with neonates who had clinically significant pneumothorax complicating RDS, in whom we used a novel technique to administer surfactant through a laryngeal mask/supraglottic airway device without applying positive pressure ventilation. Results: In 13 of the 20 neonates in our cohort, subsequent invasive ventilation and chest tube insertion were avoided. There were no major complications or unfavorable outcomes. We describe our experience with this method and suggest an approach to individualize the management of neonates with pneumothorax preceding surfactant therapy. Conclusions: In our setting, laryngeal mask airway devices are now the preferred method to deliver surfactant in neonates with RDS and pre-existing pneumothorax. We believe this approach is readily applicable in most neonatal care settings.