Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are central regulators of gene expression in response to oxygen deprivation, a common feature in critical illnesses. The significant burden that critical illnesses place on global healthcare systems highlights the need for a deeper understanding of underlying mechanisms and the development of innovative treatment strategies. Among critical illnesses, impaired lung function is frequently linked to hypoxic conditions. This review focuses on the expression and regulation of HIF signalling in experimental models of acute lung injury (ALI) and clinical studies in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We explore the potential dual role of HIF signalling in acute lung inflammation. Furthermore, its role in key biological processes and its potential prognostic significance in clinical scenarios are discussed. Finally, we explore recent pharmacological advancements targeting HIF signalling, which have emerged as promising alternatives to existing therapeutic approaches, potentially enabling more effective management strategies.

Thyroid nodules are common; the majority of them are benign and asymptomatic. Thyroidectomy might be an option; however, the frequency of post-operative complications mandates the development of al...

Background: Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common type of thyroid cancer; despite its generally indolent course, patients often develop local post-operative recurrences. Re-operation, however, holds a high complication rate, while at the same time, not all patients benefit from radioiodine ablation. This systematic review investigates the application of laser ablation therapy (LAT) for cervical lymph node metastases as an additional treatment modality. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Medline electronic database and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible articles. Results: Five studies were included in the systematic review. All studies included patients with metastatic lymph nodes from papillary thyroid carcinoma, that were unsuitable for further radioiodine or surgical treatment. Patients were treated with two different LAT devices. Regardless of the utilized assessment modalities, all researchers reported significant outcomes on local disease control. No permanent complications were observed. Conclusions: LAT is relatively safe and effective for the treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Data on COVID-19 mortality among patients in intensive care units (ICUs) from Eastern and/or Southern European countries, including Greece, are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ICU mortality trends among critically ill COVID-19 patients during the first two years of the pandemic in Greece and to further investigate if certain patients’ clinical characteristics contributed to this outcome. We conducted a multi-center retrospective observational study among five large university hospitals in Greece, between February 2020 and January 2022. All adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease who required ICU admission for at least 24 h were eligible. In total, 1462 patients (66.35% males) were included in this study. The mean age of this cohort was 64.9 (±13.27) years old. The 28-day mortality rate was 35.99% (n = 528), while the overall in-hospital mortality was 50.96% (n = 745). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that older age (≥65 years old), a body mass index within the normal range, and a delay in ICU admission from symptom onset, as well as worse baseline clinical severity scores upon ICU admission, were associated with a greater risk of death. Mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients was high during the first two years of the pandemic in Greece but comparable to other countries. Risk factors for death presented in this study are not different from those that have already been described for COVID-19 in other studies.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has impacted global health. Remdesivir was approved based on clinical trials demonstrating improved outcomes in hospitalized patients. The ReEs-COVID19 study provides real-world evidence on its effectiveness and safety across two periods: Pre-Omicron and Omicron. This retrospective, observational cohort study included 1610 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, treated with remdesivir during Pre-Omicron (September 2020–February 2021; n = 606) and Omicron (June 2022–March 2023; n = 1004) periods. Primary endpoint: time to discharge; Hepatic/renal function abnormalities were also investigated. In the Omicron period patients were older and had more comorbidities but remdesivir was initiated earlier (median: 2 days from symptom onset) compared to the Pre-Omicron period (8 days). ICU admissions rates and direct COVID-19-related deaths were significantly lower, but overall 30-day mortality was higher during the Omicron period. Earlier remdesivir administration was associated with faster discharge. Abnormal liver tests and acute kidney injury were rare across both periods. ReEs-COVID19 confirmed remdesivir’s effectiveness and safety in real-world clinical settings during both periods, underscoring its importance in treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, especially when initiated earlier in the disease course. Further research is needed to evaluate its utility in specific subgroups (e.g., immuno-compromised) and in combination with other treatments.

Remdesivir is recommended for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and for those at high risk of progression. Real-world Omicron-era data on incidental COVID-19 and high-risk outpatients remain limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study (ReEs-COVID19) in Greece (June–December 2022) including adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received remdesivir. Hospitalized patients with incidental COVID-19 (Group A, n = 138) and high-risk outpatients (Group B, n = 312) were analysed. Outcomes included clinical deterioration, mortality, and adverse events. Group A patients were older with more comorbidities. Remdesivir was initiated earlier in Group A (median 1 vs. 2 days) but with a more heterogeneous duration (48.9% vs. 97.8% in Group B, which received the standard 3-day regimen). Clinical deterioration due to COVID-19 occurred in 5.8% vs. 0.6%, and 30-day mortality was 18.1% (25/138) in Group A, including 10 COVID-19-related deaths (7.2%). Group B had two deaths (0.6%), none COVID-19-related. Adverse events were uncommon, with mild kidney injury in 3.6% of Group A and hepatotoxicity in 2.2% vs. 0.3%. In high-risk outpatients, the ReEs-COVID19 study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of remdesivir’s profile. Among incidental cases, two distinct disease patterns were identified, associated with different remdesivir regimens and highlighting the importance of comorbidities and the need for tailored clinical interventions.