Innovation is a key element for companies that aim to achieve and sustain a competitive advantage. Recently, a great number of academics and practitioners have focused on the role of cultural values to provide further incentives to firms to invest more in innovation that will give them a market edge. The purpose of this paper is to provide further insights into the relationship between cultural values and innovation. Primary data were collected from top managers in medium- and large-sized enterprises to determine how cultural values affect four types of technological innovation. The results indicate that two cultural values have a significant influence on firms’ innovative practices. Collectivism and uncertainty avoidance have a significant negative impact on radical, process and product innovation. Thus, we argue that managers who emphasize their personal ambitions and are comfortable with ambiguity are more likely to achieve innovation in their organization.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate sustainable development (CSD). In recent years, the intensity of the connection between cultural values and SD has been a heavily debated topic. Subsequently, this issue has gained considerable attention from management academics. Design/methodology/approach: To shed light on this phenomenon, this study uses econometric techniques (linear regression) and conducts a survey of business executives in medium and large firms to search for evidence that cultural values significantly affect perceptions of CSD. Findings: The findings indicate that forward-looking executives who envision themselves as individuals rather than members of a group exhibit more positive perceptions of CSD practices than the rest. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical assessment of cultural values on the perceptions of the three aspects (economic, social and environmental) of CSD.

In recent decades, sustainability reporting has received increasing business and academic attention. However, the management literature is limited regarding recent trends in the issues disclosed in these reports. In this era of multiple socio-economic crises (e.g., the global energy crisis, the Russo–Ukrainian war, and the COVID-19 pandemic), large companies have an even greater responsibility to the communities in which they operate. Given the above, the aim of this study was to examine recent sustainability reports and identify issues related to community impact. Specifically, the sustainability reports of S&P500 companies were analyzed using the Structural Topic Model in R. The results showed that the most common topics in sustainability disclosures related to community impact were “donations” and “STEM education”. Although “donations” as a topic was expected, “STEM education” emerged to highlight the importance of technology in today’s business world. These findings have important managerial and theoretical implications for sustainability reporting.

The significance of knowledge management in the tourism accommodation sector is increasingly vital due to rapid market changes and intense competition. Although the value of identifying and implementing critical success factors (CSFs) for knowledge management is widely recognized in the sector, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding and practical application of these factors. This study employs the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) methodology to systematically identify and analyze the interrelationships among these CSFs. The findings reveal a complex web of dependencies within this network. Specifically, leadership commitment and support is identified as the most influential CSF, acting as a fundamental element that enables the successful adoption and integration of knowledge management initiatives. Additionally, strategic alignment and a supportive organizational culture are crucial, working synergistically to ensure that knowledge management initiatives are aligned with overarching organizational goals and create an environment that encourages change and collaboration. Furthermore, the study highlights a mutually reinforcing relationship between knowledge processes, governance, and employee training. This relationship suggests that strong governance structures and clearly defined knowledge processes facilitate and improve the effectiveness of employee training programs while also creating a continuous improvement cycle where improved training further refines governance and knowledge processes. Moreover, the study highlights the integration of the ISO 30401:2018 standard as a systematic framework to support these CSFs, providing a structured approach to improve knowledge management systems. By mapping the cause-and-effect relationships among the identified CSFs, this research offers practical insights for industry professionals to effectively prioritize and address these factors.

The rising energy demands of data centers combined with increasing sustainability requirements require the integration of green energy solutions. This study identifies and analyzes the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) that affect the effective adoption of green energy in data centers, addressing both technical and organizational challenges. Through a systematic literature review and expert validation, eleven key CSFs were identified, encompassing aspects such as energy efficiency, renewable energy integration, carbon neutrality strategies, regulatory compliance, and investment strategies. This study employs the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methodology to explore the interdependencies among these factors, mapping causal relationships within the CSF network. The findings indicate that governance and organizational culture, along with investment strategy, are the most influential CSFs, driving the effectiveness of energy transition efforts. Carbon neutrality strategies serve as a crucial mediating factor, linking governance and financial commitment to operational sustainability outcomes. Additionally, renewable energy integration and regulatory compliance act as structural mediators, ensuring that governance-led sustainability initiatives result in practical, measurable impacts. These insights provide a strategic roadmap for data center operators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to prioritize interventions that promote a resilient and sustainable energy transition. By clarifying the cause-and-effect dynamics within the green energy adoption framework, this study contributes to the development of more effective policies and investment strategies aimed at reducing the carbon footprint of data centers and enhancing their long-term sustainability.