Katja Lähtinen

Prof. Katja Lähtinen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DDDalia D'Amato
Dalia D'Amato
NDNils Droste
Nils Droste
BAB. Allen
B. Allen
MKM. Kettunen
M. Kettunen
KLKatja Lähtinen
Katja Lähtinen
ATAnne Toppinen
Anne Toppinen

1 November 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHelena Dahlbo
Helena Dahlbo
JBJohn Bachér
John Bachér
KLKatja Lähtinen
Katja Lähtinen
TJTimo Jouttijärvi
Timo Jouttijärvi
PSPirke Suoheimo
Pirke Suoheimo
KSKaarina Saramäki
Kaarina Saramäki

1 July 2012 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTanja Myllyviita
Tanja Myllyviita
AHAnne Holma
Anne Holma
RARiina Antikainen
Riina Antikainen
KLKatja Lähtinen
Katja Lähtinen
PLPekka Leskinen
Pekka Leskinen

1 April 2018 in Journal of Forest Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ATAnne Toppinen
Anne Toppinen
ARAxel Röhr
Axel Röhr
SPSatu Pätäri
Satu Pätäri
KLKatja Lähtinen
Katja Lähtinen
RTRitva Toivonen
Ritva Toivonen

1 June 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBrent D. Matthies
Brent D. Matthies
DDDalia D'Amato
Dalia D'Amato
SBSami Berghäll
Sami Berghäll
TETommi Ekholm
Tommi Ekholm
HHHans Fredrik Hoen
Hans Fredrik Hoen
RYRasoul Yousefpour
Rasoul Yousefpour

20 May 2019 in Wood Material Science & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKatja Lähtinen
Katja Lähtinen
CHCharlotta Harju
Charlotta Harju
ATAnne Toppinen
Anne Toppinen
Multi-storey wood building (MSWB) provides options to enhance sustainable development. Despite this, no comprehension exists on how consumer perceptions differ regarding (1) willingness to live in modern houses made of timber or (2) prejudices against living in houses made of wood, although they play important role in marked demand of MSWB. In this research, views of consumers on the benefits of wood from technological, ecological, social and economic perspectives are being studied. The material of the study is based on data gathered in June–July 2018 by a postal survey sent for 1000 people living in Finland with a response rate of 25.6%. According to the factor analysis results, there are two main consumer categories based on their perceptions on sustainability benefits of wood, i.e. the ones favouring ecological and physio-technological benefits of wood and the ones favouring aesthetic and well-being benefits of wood. Additionally, according to binary regression analysis results, they differ from each other in their willingness to live in wooden houses and in their prejudices against the appropriateness of wood as a structural material. The results emphasize the need for deepening the understanding of the sustainability issues affecting the acceptability of wood among different types of consumers.