Recently, bipolar fuzzy sets have been studied and applied a bit enthusiastically and a bit increasingly. In this paper we prove that bipolar fuzzy sets and-sets (which have been deeply studied) are actually cryptomorphic mathematical notions. Since researches or modelings on real world problems often involve multi-agent, multi-attribute, multi-object, multi-index, multi-polar information, uncertainty, or/and limit process, we put forward (or highlight) the notion of-polar fuzzy set (actually,-set which can be seen as a generalization of bipolar fuzzy set, whereis an arbitrary ordinal number) and illustrate how many concepts have been defined based on bipolar fuzzy sets and many results which are related to these concepts can be generalized to the case of-polar fuzzy sets. We also give examples to show how to apply-polar fuzzy sets in real world problems.
In this paper, synchronization for a class of uncertain fractional-order neural networks subject to external disturbances and disturbed system parameters is studied. Based on the fractional-order extension of the Lyapunov stability criterion, an adaptive synchronization controller is designed, and fractional-order adaptation law is proposed to update the controller parameter online. The proposed controller can guarantee that the synchronization errors between two uncertain fractional-order neural networks converge to zero asymptotically. By using some proposed lemmas, the quadratic Lyapunov functions are employed in the stability analysis. Finally, numerical simulations are presented to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method.
In this paper, we generalize six kinds of rough set models based on j-neighborhood space (i.e., reflexive 1 j-neighborhood rough set, reflexive 2 j-neighborhood rough set, reflexive 3 j-neighborhood rough set, similarity 4 j-neighborhood rough set, similarity 5 j-neighborhood rough set, and similarity 6 j-neighborhood rough set) and investigate some of their basic properties. Further, we propose a new neighborhood space called j-adhesion neighborhood based on six types of rough set models (i.e., reflexive 7 j-adhesion neighborhood rough set, reflexive 8 j-adhesion neighborhood rough set, reflexive 9 j-adhesion neighborhood rough set, similarity 10 j-adhesion neighborhood rough set, similarity 11 j-adhesion neighborhood rough set, and similarity 12 j-neighborhood rough set) to reduce the boundary region and the accuracy. The fundamental properties of approximation operators based on j-adhesion neighborhood space are investigated. The relationship between the properties of these types is explained. Finally, we give comparisons between the proposed approach with the previous approach (i.e., Abo-Tabl’s approach and Dai et al.’s approach) from six types of rough set models. Consequently, the accuracy from the proposed approach is improved.