In the present study, the flow structure of discontinuous double-layered vegetation patches was investigated using a 3D Reynolds stress turbulence model (RSM). The channel domain was built using GAMBIT (Geometry and Mesh Building Intelligent Toolkit). For the simulation and postprocessing, FLUENT (ANSYS) was used to analyze the distribution of the mean velocity, Reynolds stresses, and other flow properties against two different flow conditions. The results captured by the turbulence model at specific locations and the cross section are presented in the form of various velocity profiles and contour plots. In the gap portion, the velocity was visibly lower than that in the vegetation areas, while the influence of patch distribution was not visible in the overlying flow layer. The velocity profiles at critical locations were categorized by numerous modulation points and velocity projections close to the bed, principally for positions straight after the vegetation structures. A distinction in the velocity at the topmost of the smaller vegetation structure was prominent. Reynolds stresses, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulence intensity exhibited large fluctuations inside the vegetation regions and just behind the vegetation structures compared with in the gap regions.

This study investigates the role of emerged vegetation in enhancing the performance of submerged spur dikes for better flow control and bank protection in river systems. The research utilizes a numerical model based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), validated with experimental data. After validation, the study explores various configurations of vegetated spur dike, adjusting the submergence heights of the impermeable spur dike to achieve porosity ranging from fully impermeable to highly porous. Porosity levels of 24%, 48%, and 72% were chosen based on the spur dike height and the effectiveness of staggered vegetation arrangements in maximizing drag and reducing velocity. This approach aims to determine their impact on flow structure, velocity, and turbulence characteristics. The results reveal that impermeable dikes create strong recirculation zones downstream, increasing the potential for bank erosion. Introducing vegetation on the dike, particularly at moderate porosities (24% and 48%), effectively disrupts this behavior by reducing downstream velocity and mitigating mass and momentum exchange concentration between the spur dike field and the mainstream. However, the highest porosity case (72%) offered reduced flow resistance, limiting its protective effectiveness. Analysis of velocity and stress distributions showed that vegetation porosity significantly impacts normal and shear stresses, influencing flow stability at critical points around the spur dike. The findings signify the potential of integrating vegetation into spur dike designs to achieve a balance between effective flow conveyance and erosion control even in the spur dike submergence condition. This approach can outperform conventional emerged impermeable spur dikes, as supported by previous studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of porous and vegetated structures in reducing flow resistance, minimizing stagnation zones, and improving sediment deposition compared to impermeable designs.