Grain filling plays an important role in achieving high grain yield. Manipulating planting densities is recognized as a viable approach to compensate for the reduced yield caused by nitrogen reduction. Understanding the effects of nitrogen fertilization and planting density on superior and inferior grain filling is crucial to ensure grain security. Hence, double-cropping paddy field trials were conducted to investigate the effect of three nitrogen levels (N1, conventional nitrogen application; N2, 10% nitrogen reduction; N3, 20% nitrogen reduction) and three planting densities (D1, conventional planting density; D2, 20% density increase; D3, 40% density increase) on grain yield, yield formation, and grain-filling characteristics at two sowing dates (S1, a conventional sowing date, and S2, a date postponed by ten days) in 2019–2020. The results revealed that the annual yield of S1 was 8.5–14% higher than that of S2. Reducing nitrogen from N2 to N3 decreased the annual yield by 2.8–7.6%, but increasing planting densities from D1 to D3 significantly improved yield, by 6.2–19.4%. Furthermore, N2D3 had the highest yield, which was 8.7–23.8% higher than the plants that had received the other treatments. The rice yield increase was attributed to higher numbers of panicles per m² and spikelets per panicle on the primary branches, influenced by superior grain filling. Increasing planting density and reducing nitrogen application significantly affected grain-filling weight, with the 40% density increase significantly facilitating superior and inferior grain filling with the same nitrogen level. Increasing density can improve superior grains while reducing nitrogen will decrease superior grains. These results suggest that N2D3 is an optimal strategy to increase yield and grain filling for double-cropping rice grown under two sowing-date conditions.

Optimized fertilizer use improves crop yield and mitigates environmental pollution associated with crop production. Fertilizer and plant density are core strategies to ensure food security and cope with climate change. However, little is known about the long-term interactive effect of reduced nitrogen (N) and increased density on yield and C (Carbon) balance. In this study, field experiments were conducted in a double-cropping rice region to evaluate long-term effects on yield and carbon footprint (CF) by crop-based and soil-based methods. Treatments were set for 10% reduction in N coupling with conventional density (N1D1), 20% higher density (N1D2), 40% higher density (N1D3), and 20% reduction in N coupling with conventional density (N2D1), 20% higher density (N2D2), and 40% higher density (N2D3), with the prevailing practices as control, conventional plant density, and fertilizer dose. Results showed that the yield continued to increase with increasing density; under the same density, reducing N by 10% is more beneficial for yield improvement and for CH₄ emission reduction. Compared with CK, reducing N application by 10% generally increased the annual yields by 7.34–23.25% on average, and reduced CH₄ emissions by 16.19–22.11%, resulting in a reduced crop-based carbon footprint of 22.24–26.82%, and a reduced soil-based carbon footprint of 22.08–32.85%. While reducing N application by 20% increased the annual yields by 5.00–20.19% and reduced the CH₄ emission by 1.66–4.93%, it reduced crop-based carbon footprints by 1.81–10.05% and reduced soil-based carbon footprints by 7.22–19.86%. As density increased, the crop-based CF decreased, whereas the soil-based CF increased. Overall, the highest yield and the lowest soil-based CF and unit yield CF (CFy) were observed in N1D3. Regarding sustainability, a 10% reduction in N, along with an increase in density to 40%, can be recommended for double-cropping rice production.