Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity. In recent years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure owing to its technical feasibility and excellent short-term outcomes. Despite these favorable results and perceived advantages, SG is associated with several unique complications. Complications such as a postoperative leak or bleeding have been more commonly observed and reported than others, and their management approaches are well described. However, other complications following SG are far less familiar to surgeons, which may delay recognition and result in poor patient outcomes. Of these complications, we describe splenic injuries; esophageal perforation; staple line malformations; stapling of intraluminal devices; phytobezoar formation; gastro-colic, gastro-pleural and gastro-bronchial fistula; pancreatic leak; and portomesenteric venous thrombosis. It is paramount for surgeons to be aware of these underreported issues and have the resources to learn how to recognize and manage them when they arise. This review aims to describe rare (i.e., reported incidence <1%) and underdescribed complications after SG, focusing on causes, clinical presentation, prevention strategies, and management.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has demonstrated excellent glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission for patients with obesity and T2DM. Duration of T2DM is a consistent negative predictor of remission after RYGB. However, the exact timing to offer surgical intervention during the course of the disease is not well elucidated. Material and methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study between 2008 and 2020 to establish the exact association between duration of T2DM and remission after RYGB. The authors divided our cohort into quartiles of preoperative disease duration to quantify the change in remission rates for each year of delay between T2DM diagnosis and RYGB. The authors also compared the average time to remission and changes in glycemic control parameters. Results: A total of 519 patients (67.2% female; age 53.4±10.7 year; BMI 46.6±8.4 kg/m²) with a follow-up period of 6.6±3.8 years were included. Remission was demonstrated in 51% of patients. Longer duration of T2DM was a significant negative predictor of remission with an estimated decrease in remission rates of 7% for each year of delay [(OR=0.931 (95% CI: 0.892–0.971); P<0.001)]. Compared to patients with <3 years of T2DM, remission decreased by 37% for patients with 3–6 years, 64% for those with 7–12 years, and 81% for patients with more than 12 years (P<0.001). Half of the patients reached T2DM remission after 0.5 and 1.1 years, respectively, for the first and second quartiles, while patients in the other quartiles never reached 50% remission. Lastly, The authors noted an overall improvement in all glycemic control parameters for all quartiles at last follow-up. Conclusion: Patients with a recent history of T2DM who undergo early RYGB experience significantly higher and earlier T2DM remission compared to patients with a prolonged history of preoperative T2DM, suggesting potential benefit of early surgical intervention to manage patients with obesity and T2DM.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity, with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) being the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure. Long-term studies have demonstrated that 15–20% of patients require revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) due to weight-related issues or surgical complications. Despite the gold standard being laparoscopic revision, there are other available approaches such as open or robotic-assisted. An extensive literature review was performed for articles from their inception to February 2024. A descriptive review of MBS procedures (SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) and biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS)) was carried out to report and compare outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery. A similar review was conducted to compare outcomes of revisional approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic). RYGB remains the dominant RBS with a similar safety profile compared to revisional SADI and BPD-DS. In terms of the RBS surgical approach, all three options showed comparable short and long-term outcomes, with robotic RBS being associated with longer operative time and variable length of stay. Additional long-term studies are required to further validate our conclusions.

Background and Aims: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is one of the most lethal cancers, characterized by molecular heterogeneity and treatment resistance. To uncover new biological signals and therapeutic opportunities, we employed multiomic characterization combined with machine learning. Approach and Results: We profiled all anatomical CCA subtypes using whole exome sequencing, mRNA sequencing, and proteome/phosphoproteome analysis. Integrative dimensional reduction revealed RNA, protein, and phosphoprotein features driving tumor heterogeneity, enabling clustering. Machine learning algorithms identified molecular features for each cluster and mapped external datasets and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models onto these clusters. Kinase enrichment analysis highlighted targetable kinases active in each cluster. In vivo validation was performed in cluster-specific PDX models using the selective TNK1 inhibitor, TP-5801. We identified 3 molecular clusters with distinct pathway characterization: immunomodulatory (cluster 1), metabolic (cluster 2), and gene regulation/cellular fate (cluster 3). Cluster assignment was independent of anatomic subtype but correlated with overall survival following curative-intent resection. We also identified multiomic features and pathways linked to overall survival and lymph node metastases, crucial for patient treatment selection. Kinase enrichment analysis pinpointed TNK1 as a highly active kinase in the metabolic cluster. Treatment with TP-5801 significantly reduced tumor growth in a metabolic PDX model, but not in models representing the other clusters. Combining internal data with publicly available datasets, we identified the immunomodulatory cluster as most responsive to gemcitabine/cisplatin therapy, confirmed in vivo using cluster-specific PDX models. Conclusions: Integrated multiomic characterization provides translational insights by defining unique molecular subtypes associated both with therapeutic response and overall clinical outcomes. This approach identified TNK1 as a previously unrecognized therapeutic target in a defined subset of CCA tumors.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive form of liver cancer and is an increasing cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Despite its increasing incidence globally and alarming mortality, treatment options for CCA have largely remained unchanged, stressing the importance of developing new effective therapies. YAP activation is common in CCA, and its major transcriptional signaling partners are the TEAD proteins. CA3 is a small‐molecule YAP‐TEAD disrupter discovered utilizing a TEAD reporter assay. Utilizing CCA, gastric cancer cell lines, and patient‐derived xenograft models (PDX), we demonstrate that CA3 is effective in inducing cell death and delaying tumor growth in both FGFR2 fusion and wild‐type models. CA3 was associated with on‐target decreases in YAP‐TEAD target gene expression, TEAD reporter activity, and overall TEAD levels. Hippo pathway signaling was not altered as there was no change in YAP phosphorylation status in the cells exposed to CA3. RNA sequencing of gastric cancer and CCA models demonstrated upregulation of an androgen receptor–mediated transcriptional program following exposure to CA3 in five unique models tested. Consistent with this upstream regulator analysis, CA3 exposure in CCA cells was associated with increased AR protein levels, and combinatorial therapy with CA3 and androgen receptor blockade was associated with increased cancer cell death. CA3 behaves functionally as a YAP‐TEAD disrupter in the models tested and demonstrated therapeutic efficacy. Exposure to CA3 was associated with compensatory androgen receptor signaling and dual inhibition improved the therapeutic effect.