Revisional metabolic and bariatric surgery (RMBS) presents unique challenges in addressing weight loss failure or complications arising from initial bariatric procedures. This review aims to explore the complexities and solutions associated with revisional bariatric procedures comprehensively, offering insights into the evolving terrain of metabolic and bariatric surgery. A literature review is conducted to identify pertinent studies and expert opinions regarding RMBS. Methodological approaches, patient selection criteria, surgical techniques, preoperative assessments, and postoperative management strategies are synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of current practices and advancements in the field, including institutional protocols. This review synthesizes key findings regarding the challenges encountered in RMBS, including the underlying causes of primary procedure failure, anatomical complexities, technical considerations, and assessments of surgical outcomes. Additionally, patient outcomes, complication rates, and long-term success are presented, along with institutional approaches to patient assessment and procedure selection. This review provides valuable insights for clinicians grappling with the complexities of RMBS. A comprehensive understanding of patient selection, surgical techniques, preoperative management, and postoperative care is crucial for enhancing outcomes and ensuring patient satisfaction in the field of metabolic bariatric surgery.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with numerous chronic conditions and an increased risk for surgical complications. Laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy have proven effective in the resection of adrenal tumors. This study analyzes the outcomes of severely obese patients (body-mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m²) following minimally invasive adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2023 was conducted. Two matching analyses were performed. The first analysis compared patients with BMI greater versus lower than 35 kg/m². The second analysis compared outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with a BMI ≥35 kg/m². Results: A total of 278 patients were included in the study. The median tumor size was 29 mm. Adrenal tumors had similar laterality, and most were hormonally active (66.2%). The most common pathological diagnosis was pheochromocytoma (25.5%). No statistical difference was found in peri- and postoperative outcomes between patients with BMI ≥35 and <35 kg/m² who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy. When the surgical approach was compared in severely obese patients, robotic adrenalectomy was associated with shorter hospital length of stay with similar operative time as the laparoscopic approach. Conclusions: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is safe and feasible in patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m². Robotic and laparoscopic approaches are both safe and efficient for the resection of adrenal tumors in severely obese patients.

Liver transplant surgery is a complex procedure that demands high knowledge of surgical anatomy and the precise recognition and preservation of structures. To address this, the use of fluorescence imaging has facilitated the identification of anatomical structures such as biliary ducts, arteries, and liver segmentation. Indocyanine green is among the most commonly utilized fluorescent agents, not just during surgery but also in the pre- and postoperative phases, where it is used to assess graft failure by measuring the plasma disappearance rate. New advancements such as artificial intelligence paired with fluorescence imaging have the potential to enhance patient outcomes. Additionally, technologies such as augmented reality and mixed reality could be integrated into surgical procedures, broadening the scope of possibilities for improving patient safety.

Background: Revisional bariatric surgery for recurrent weight gain is becoming more common, though it carries higher risks and may be less effective than primary bariatric surgery. This study compares clinical outcomes between primary and revisional duodenal switch (DS) in patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 55 kg/m². Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 20 patients who underwent either primary or revisional duodenal switch (DS) surgeries, including biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS) and Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-s), between January 2015 and December 2023. Revisional DS was defined as the conversion from Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) to either BPDDS (C-BPDDS) or SADI-S (C-SADI-S). Perioperative and postoperative variables were analyzed. A statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and McNemar tests for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Eleven primary DS patients (six BPDDS, five SADI-s) and nine revisional DS patients (five C-BPDDS, four C-SADI-s) were included. The revisional group had a slightly higher preoperative BMI (57.56 ± 5.92 kg/m² vs. 55.93 kg/m² ± 6.91 kg/m²). Although operative times were shorter in the revisional group (153.20 ± 53.26 vs. 193.27 ± 46.79 min), the length of stay was longer (2.70 ± 1.25 vs. 2.18 ± 1.16 days). Primary DS patients experienced three minor late complications (dehydration, nephrolithiasis), whereas the revisional group had one major complication (internal hernia requiring reoperation). At the 12-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated similar outcomes in terms of percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (primary DS: 25.25% ± 12.38 vs. revisional DS: 30.31% ± 10.79) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) (primary DS: 48.41% ± 22.93 vs. revisional DS: 53.24% ± 14.48). Conclusions: Revisional DS was associated with shorter operation times and similar weight loss to primary DS. Additionally, it was accomplished safely and led to adequate and sustained weight loss in patients with a BMI greater than 55 kg/m².