Melanie Morel-Rouhier

Prof. Dr. Melanie Morel-Rouhier

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 June 2015 in BMC Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBenoit Calmes
Benoit Calmes
MMMelanie Morel-Rouhier
Melanie Morel-Rouhier
NBNelly Bataillé-Simoneau
Nelly Bataillé-Simoneau
GEGelhaye Eric
Gelhaye Eric
TGThomas Guillemette
Thomas Guillemette
PSPhilippe Simoneau
Philippe Simoneau
Glutathione transferases (GSTs) represent an extended family of multifunctional proteins involved in detoxification processes and tolerance to oxidative stress. We thus anticipated that some GSTs could play an essential role in the protection of fungal necrotrophs against plant-derived toxic metabolites and reactive oxygen species that accumulate at the host-pathogen interface during infection. Mining the genome of the necrotrophic Brassica pathogen Alternaria brassicicola for glutathione transferase revealed 23 sequences, 17 of which could be clustered into the main classes previously defined for fungal GSTs and six were ‘orphans’. Five isothiocyanate-inducible GSTs from five different classes were more thoroughly investigated. Analysis of their catalytic properties revealed that two GSTs, belonging to the GSTFuA and GTT1 classes, exhibited GSH transferase activity with isothiocyanates (ITC) and peroxidase activity with cumene hydroperoxide, respectively. Mutant deficient for these two GSTs were however neither more susceptible to ITC nor less aggressive than the wild-type parental strain. By contrast mutants deficient for two other GSTs, belonging to the Ure2pB and GSTO classes, were distinguished by their hyper-susceptibility to ITC and low aggressiveness against Brassica oleracea. In particular AbGSTO1 could participate in cell tolerance to ITC due to its glutathione-dependent thioltransferase activity. The fifth ITC-inducible GST belonged to the MAPEG class and although it was not possible to produce the soluble active form of this protein in a bacterial expression system, the corresponding deficient mutant failed to develop normal symptoms on host plant tissues. Among the five ITC-inducible GSTs analyzed in this study, three were found essential for full aggressiveness of A. brassicicola on host plant. This, to our knowledge is the first evidence that GSTs might be essential virulence factors for fungal necrotrophs.

18 May 2023 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJosip Safran
Josip Safran
WTWafae Tabi
Wafae Tabi
VUVanessa Ung
Vanessa Ung
ALAdrien Lemaire
Adrien Lemaire
OHOlivier Habrylo
Olivier Habrylo
JPJérôme Pelloux
Jérôme Pelloux
Polygalacturonases (PGs) fine-tune pectins to modulate cell wall chemistry and mechanics, impacting plant development. The large number of PGs encoded in plant genomes leads to questions on the diversity and specificity of distinct isozymes. Herein, we report the crystal structures of two Arabidopsis thaliana polygalacturonases, POLYGALACTURONASE LATERAL ROOT (PGLR) and ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE2 (ADPG2), which are co-expressed during root development. We first determined the amino acid variations and steric clashes that explain the absence of inhibition of the plant PGs by endogenous PG-Inhibiting Proteins (PGIPs). Although their beta helix folds are highly similar, PGLR and ADPG2 subsites in the substrate-binding groove are occupied by divergent amino acids. By combining molecular dynamic simulations, analysis of enzyme kinetics and hydrolysis products, we showed that these structural differences translated into distinct enzyme-substrate dynamics and enzyme processivities: ADPG2 showed greater substrate fluctuations with hydrolysis products, oligogalacturonides (OGs), with a degree of polymerization (DP) of ≤4, while the DP of OGs generated by PGLR was between 5 and 9. Using the Arabidopsis root as a developmental model, exogenous application of purified enzymes showed that the highly processive ADPG2 had major effects on both root cell elongation and cell adhesion. This work highlights the importance of PG processivity on pectin degradation regulating plant development.

15 October 2014 in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAnne Thuillier
Anne Thuillier
KCkamel chibani
kamel chibani
GMGemma Belli Martinez
Gemma Belli Martinez
EHEnrique Herrero
Enrique Herrero
SDStéphane Dumarçay
Stéphane Dumarçay
MMMelanie Morel-Rouhier
Melanie Morel-Rouhier
The first steps of wood degradation by fungi lead to the release of toxic compounds known as extractives. To better understand how lignolytic fungi cope with the toxicity of these molecules, a transcriptomic analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium genes was performed in the presence of oak acetonic extracts. It reveals that in complement to the extracellular machinery of degradation, intracellular antioxidant and detoxification systems contribute to the lignolytic capabilities of fungi, presumably by preventing cellular damages and maintaining fungal health. Focusing on these systems, a glutathione transferase ( P. chrysosporium GTT2.1 [PcGTT2.1]) has been selected for functional characterization. This enzyme, not characterized so far in basidiomycetes, has been classified first as a GTT2 compared to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae isoform. However, a deeper analysis shows that the GTT2.1 isoform has evolved functionally to reduce lipid peroxidation by recognizing high-molecular-weight peroxides as substrates. Moreover, the GTT2.1 gene has been lost in some non-wood-decay fungi. This example suggests that the intracellular detoxification system evolved concomitantly with the extracellular ligninolytic machinery in relation to the capacity of fungi to degrade wood.

1 October 2015 in Fungal Genetics and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRThomas Roret
Thomas Roret
ATAnne Thuillier
Anne Thuillier
FFFrédérique Favier
Frédérique Favier
EGEric Gelhaye
Eric Gelhaye
CDClaude DIDIERJEAN
Claude DIDIERJEAN
MMMelanie Morel-Rouhier
Melanie Morel-Rouhier

16 May 2023 in Microbial Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DNDelphine Noel
Delphine Noel
JHJohn Hallsworth
John Hallsworth
GEGelhaye Eric
Gelhaye Eric
SDSylvain Darnet
Sylvain Darnet
RSRodnay Sormani
Rodnay Sormani
MMMelanie Morel-Rouhier
Melanie Morel-Rouhier
Fungi and antifungal compounds are relevant to the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. However, the modes‐of‐action of antifungals—whether they are naturally occurring substances or anthropogenic fungicides—are often unknown or are misallocated in terms of their mechanistic category. Here, we consider the most effective approaches to identifying whether antifungal substances are cellular stressors, toxins/toxicants (that are target‐site‐specific), or have a hybrid mode‐of‐action as toxin–stressors (that induce cellular stress yet are target‐site‐specific). This newly described ‘ toxin–stressor ’ category includes some photosensitisers that target the cell membrane and, once activated by light or ultraviolet radiation, cause oxidative damage. We provide a glossary of terms and a diagrammatic representation of diverse types of stressors, toxic substances, and toxin–stressors , a classification that is pertinent to inhibitory substances not only for fungi but for all types of cellular life. A decision‐tree approach can also be used to help differentiate toxic substances from cellular stressors ( Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015 33: 228–259). For compounds that target specific sites in the cell, we evaluate the relative merits of using metabolite analyses, chemical genetics, chemoproteomics, transcriptomics, and the target‐based drug‐discovery approach (based on that used in pharmaceutical research), focusing on both ascomycete models and the less‐studied basidiomycete fungi. Chemical genetic methods to elucidate modes‐of‐action currently have limited application for fungi where molecular tools are not yet available; we discuss ways to circumvent this bottleneck. We also discuss ecologically commonplace scenarios in which multiple substances act to limit the functionality of the fungal cell and a number of as‐yet‐unresolved questions about the modes‐of‐action of antifungal compounds pertaining to the Sustainable Development Goals.

7 May 2016 in Microbial Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NVNicolas Valette
Nicolas Valette
IBIsabelle Benoit‐Gelber
Isabelle Benoit‐Gelber
MFMarcos Di Falco
Marcos Di Falco
AWAd Wiebenga
Ad Wiebenga
RVRonald de Vries
Ronald de Vries
MMMelanie Morel-Rouhier
Melanie Morel-Rouhier
Summary: Small secreted proteins ( SSP ) have been defined as proteins containing a signal peptide and a sequence of less than 300 amino acids. In this analysis, we have compared the secretion pattern of SSP s among eight aspergilli species in the context of plant biomass degradation and have highlighted putative interesting candidates that could be involved in the degradative process or in the strategies developed by fungi to resist the associated stress that could be due to the toxicity of some aromatic compounds or reactive oxygen species released during degradation. Among these candidates, for example, some stress‐related superoxide dismutases or some hydrophobic surface binding proteins (HsbA) are specifically secreted according to the species . Since these latter proteins are able to recruit lytic enzymes to the surface of hydrophobic solid materials and promote their degradation, a synergistic action of HsbA with the degradative system may be considered and need further investigations. These SSP s could have great applications in biotechnology by optimizing the efficiency of the enzymatic systems for biomass degradation.