Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are complex and affect a large part of the world’s population; early accurate and timely prediction is also complicated. Typically, predicting CVDs involves using statistical models and other forms of standard machine learning. Although these methods offer some level of prediction, their black-box nature severely hinders the ability of the healthcare professional to trust and use the predictions. The following are some of the challenges that Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) may solve since it can give an understanding of the decision-making system of AI to build confidence and increase usability.Methods: This research introduced an intelligent forecasting system for cardiovascular events using XAI and addressed the limitations of traditional methods. This proposed system incorporates advanced machine learning algorithms integrated with XAI to examine a dataset comprising 308,737 patient records with features including age, BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and lifestyle factors. This dataset was sourced from the Kaggle Cardiovascular Disease dataset.Results: Incorporating XAI offers an understandable explanation so that the healthcare professional can understand and make the AI-driven prediction trustworthy enough to improve the decision-making of treatment and care delivery for the patients. The simulation results of the proposed system provide better results than those of the previously published research works in terms of 91.94% accuracy and 8.06% miss rate.Discussion: This proposed system makes it clear that XAI has the potential to significantly improve cardiovascular healthcare by enhancing transparency, reliability, and the quality of patient care.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the scientific collaboration of institutions and its impact on institutional research performance in terms of productivity and quality. The researchers examined the local and international collaborations that have a great impact on institutional performance. Design/methodology/approach: Collaboration dependence measure was used to investigate the impact of an institution on external information. Based on this information, the authors used “index of gain in impact through collaboration” to find the impact of collaborated publications in institutional research performance. Bibliographic data between 1996 and 2010 retrieved from Scopus were used to conduct current study. The authors carried out the case study of top institutes of Pakistan in terms of publication count to elaborate the difference between high performing institutions and those who gain disproportionally in terms of perceived quality of their output because of local or international collaboration. Findings: The results showed that the collaboration of developing countries institutes on international level had a great impact on institutional performance and they gain more benefit than local collaboration. Altogether, the scientific collaboration has a positive impact on institutional performance as measured by the cumulative source normalized impact per paper of their publications. The findings could also help researchers to find out appropriate collaboration partners. Originality/value: This study has revealed some salient characteristics of collaboration in academic research. It becomes apparent that collaboration intensity is not uniform, but in general, the average quality of scientific production is the variable that most often correlates positively with the collaboration intensity of universities.