Darie-Ioan Andreescu

Mr. Darie-Ioan Andreescu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 March 2024 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMihai Lazar
Mihai Lazar
MSMihai Săndulescu
Mihai Săndulescu
EBEcaterina Constanta Barbu
Ecaterina Constanta Barbu
CCCristina Emilia Chitu-Tisu
Cristina Emilia Chitu-Tisu
DADarie-Ioan Andreescu
Darie-Ioan Andreescu
DIDaniela Adriana Ion
Daniela Adriana Ion
SARS-CoV-2 infection is a significant health concern that needs to be addressed not only during the initial phase of infection but also after hospitalization. This is the consequence of the various pathologies associated with long COVID-19, which are still being studied and researched. Lung fibrosis is an important complication after COVID-19, found in up to 71% of patients after discharge. Our research is based on scientific articles indexed in PubMed; in the selection process, we used the following keywords: “lung fibrosis”, “fibrosis mediators”, “fibrosis predictors”, “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2 infection”, and “long COVID-19”. In this narrative review, we aimed to discuss the current understanding of the mechanisms of initiation and progression of post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis (PC-19-LF) and the risk factors for its occurrence. The pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis involves various mediators such as TGF-β, legumain, osteopontin, IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, IL-17, TNF-α, Gal-1, Gal-3, PDGF, and FGFR-1. The key cellular effectors involved in COVID-19 lung fibrosis are macrophages, epithelial alveolar cells, neutrophils, and fibroblasts. The main fibrosis pathways in SARS-CoV-2 infection include hypoxemia-induced fibrosis, macrophage-induced fibrosis, and viral-fibroblast interaction-induced fibrosis.

21 November 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMihai Lazar
Mihai Lazar
VMVALENTINA RUXANDRA MOROTI-CONSTANTINESCU
VALENTINA RUXANDRA MOROTI-CONSTANTINESCU
EBEcaterina Constanta Barbu
Ecaterina Constanta Barbu
CCCristina Emilia Chitu
Cristina Emilia Chitu
CTCatalin Tiliscan
Catalin Tiliscan
MOMihaela Cristina Olariu
Mihaela Cristina Olariu
Background/Objectives: This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how HIV alters normal aging trajectories in the brain, presenting the HIV-related molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological pathways involved in brain aging. The review explores the roles of inflammation, oxidative stress, and viral persistence in the brain, highlighting how these factors contribute to neuronal damage and cognitive impairment and accelerate normal brain aging. Additionally, it also addresses the impact of antiretroviral therapy on brain aging and the biological markers associated with its occurrence. Methods: We extensively searched PubMed for English-language articles published from 2000 to 2024. The following keywords were used in the search: “HIV”, “brain”, “brain aging”, “neuroinflammation”, “HAART”, and “HAND”. This strategy yielded 250 articles for inclusion in our review. Results: A combination of blood-brain barrier dysfunction, with the direct effects of HIV on the central nervous system, chronic neuroinflammation, telomere shortening, neurogenesis impairments, and neurotoxicity associated with antiretroviral treatment (ART), alters and amplifies the mechanisms of normal brain aging. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that HIV infection accelerates neurodegenerative processes of normal brain aging, leading to cognitive decline and structural brain changes at an earlier age than typically observed in the general population.

9 August 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStefan Bogdan
Stefan Bogdan
Mircea Ioan Alexandru BistriceanuMircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Cosmin Gabriel UrsuCosmin Gabriel Ursu
Cosmin Gabriel Ursu
AAAndrei Constantin Anghel
Andrei Constantin Anghel
DADarie-Ioan Andreescu
Darie-Ioan Andreescu
Alexandru DeaconuAlexandru Deaconu
Alexandru Deaconu
Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at elevated risk for device-related complications following pacemaker implantation. Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) offer theoretical advantages over transvenous pacemakers (TVPs), but their safety and efficacy in this high-risk population remain unclear. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes and complication profiles between leadless and transvenous pacemakers in patients with ESRD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines, including three retrospective studies comparing LPMs and TVPs in ESRD patients. The primary endpoint was overall complications post-implantation. Secondary outcomes included early mortality (within 30 days), access site complications, device-related events, thrombotic events, and respiratory complications. A random-effects model was used to pool odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Three studies comprising 10.075 ESRD patients were included. No significant difference was found in overall complications (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.78–2.33, p = 0.14) or early mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.42–2.43, p = 0.97) between LPM and TVP groups. However, LPMs were associated with increased access site complications (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.06–5.90, p = 0.04), thrombotic events (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14–1.78, p = 0.03), and respiratory complications (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01–2.03, p = 0.05). Device-related complication rates were similar (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63–1.88; p = 0.30). Heterogeneity was low across most outcomes. Conclusions: Among patients with ESRD, leadless pacemakers did not reduce overall complications or short-term mortality compared to transvenous systems and were associated with increased risk of certain procedural complications. These findings could support a personalized approach to device selection in ESRD and highlight the need for further prospective studies to guide clinical decision-making in this population.

18 July 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlexandru Ababei
Alexandru Ababei
Cosmin Gabriel UrsuCosmin Gabriel Ursu
Cosmin Gabriel Ursu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru BistriceanuMircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
DADarie-Ioan Andreescu
Darie-Ioan Andreescu
IIIasmina Maria Iurea
Iasmina Maria Iurea
SBStefan Bogdan
Stefan Bogdan
Background: When conservative therapies are insufficient for vasovagal syncope (VVS), procedural options such as permanent pacemakers or catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GP) may be considered. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of GP catheter ablation in patients with VVS. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 15 March 2024 to 10 May 2025. After duplicate removal, two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed full texts based on predefined criteria. A single-arm proportion meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Thirty-seven studies comprising 1585 participants were included. The pooled proportion of VVS recurrence after ablation was 8.9% (95% CI, 6.4–11.4%), but with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 74.4%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimate. A meta-regression was performed to further explore potential effect modifiers, but no covariate reached statistical significance. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ganglionated plexi catheter ablation may be associated with a reduced recurrence of vasovagal syncope in selected populations. However, the findings are based predominantly on non-randomized observational studies, and the high between-study heterogeneity limits the strength of inference. Future randomized controlled trials with standardized methodologies are needed to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of this intervention.

7 February 2026 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFlorin Anghel
Florin Anghel
Mircea Ioan Alexandru BistriceanuMircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Cristian Valentin TomaCristian Valentin Toma
Cristian Valentin Toma
Cosmin Gabriel UrsuCosmin Gabriel Ursu
Cosmin Gabriel Ursu
ADAndrei Dăneț
Andrei Dăneț
CBCatalin Constantin Badiu
Catalin Constantin Badiu
Background and Objectives: Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (TE-AVR) is a minimally invasive technique offering potential benefits of reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery compared with median sternotomy or other minimally invasive access. While isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) is well established through conventional and minimally invasive access, large-scale evidence for the totally endoscopic approach remains limited. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the safety and feasibility of TE-AVR by aggregating perioperative outcomes, including mortality, stroke, conversion, bleeding, paravalvular leak (PVL), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of totally endoscopic or thoracoscopic AVR were eligible. After independent screening and selection, data were analyzed using a single-arm proportion model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of individual studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024610128). Results: A total of 11 studies comprising 1135 patients were included. The pooled perioperative mortality was 0.00% (95% CI 0.00–0.23; I2 = 0.0%), indicating highly consistent results across cohorts. The stroke incidence was 0.69% (95% CI 0.00–2.07; I2 = 42.7%), confirming the low cerebrovascular risk of this approach. Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 0.00% of cases (95% CI 0.00–0.17; I2 = 0.0%), with no statistical heterogeneity observed. Reintervention for bleeding occurred in 1.75% (95% CI 0.34–3.85; I2 = 43.4%), while PVL was reported in 1.24% (95% CI 0.00–4.22; I2 = 64.0%). AF incidence was 10.54% (95% CI 3.79–19.70; I2 = 90.5%), with substantial between-study heterogeneity, likely related to non-standardized definitions of new-onset AF and variability in postoperative rhythm monitoring and reporting across studies. Conclusions: TE-AVR is a safe and feasible technique associated with very low perioperative mortality, bleeding, and stroke rates, as well as low PVL incidence. The absent conversion rate in our pooled analysis highlights the technical reliability of the procedure. Variability in AF reporting underscores the need for future randomized studies with harmonized definitions. Overall, TE-AVR offers a promising minimally invasive alternative for aortic valve replacement, with potential advantages in recovery (pooled ICU stay 1.86 days), hospital stay (pooled 7.98 days), and aesthetic outcomes.

18 January 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLiviu Stefan Calin
Liviu Stefan Calin
DADarie-Ioan Andreescu
Darie-Ioan Andreescu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru BistriceanuMircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Mircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu
Cosmin Gabriel UrsuCosmin Gabriel Ursu
Cosmin Gabriel Ursu
AAAndrei Constantin Anghel
Andrei Constantin Anghel
Stefan Sebastian BusnatuStefan Sebastian Busnatu
Stefan Sebastian Busnatu
Background/Objectives: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is known to improve clinical outcomes in cardiovascular disease, yet its benefits in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are not well established. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of CR on functional capacity and safety in ICD recipients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving adults who underwent ICD implantation and were assigned to either CR or standard care. The primary outcome was the change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) from the baseline to the final follow-up. Random-effects models were applied, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up duration, supervision type, baseline peak VO2, and ischemic vs. non-ischemic etiology. Results: Seven RCTs involving 1461 participants (784 CR; 677 control) met the inclusion criteria. CR was associated with a significant improvement peak VO2 compared with usual care, expressed as the mean difference (MD) in change from the baseline to the last follow-up (MD 2 mL·kg−1·min−1; 95% CI 1.02–2.81; I2 = 65.7%), with consistent effects across all subgroups. Quality of life improved in the CR group (MD 6.46; 95% CI 2.25–10.67; I2 = 0%). A non-significant trend toward increased 6MWT distance was observed. CR did not increase adverse events, including ICD shocks, hospitalizations, or cardiac deaths. Conclusions: CR safely enhances exercise capacity and quality of life in ICD recipients without increasing arrhythmic events or mortality. Larger standardized trials are warranted to optimize CR delivery in this population.