In 2016 the World Health Organization reported 39% of the world's adult population (over 18 y) was overweight, with western countries such as Australia and the United States of America at 64.5% and 67.9% respectively. Overconsumption of high fat/sugar containing food and beverages contribute to the development of obesity. Neural plasticity that occurs as a result of long term sugar consumption has been shown to reduce impulse control and therefore lower the ability to resist the high fat/sugar foods contributing to the obesity epidemic. There is significant overlap between the neural pathways involved in emotions that guide behavioural responses to survival situations with those regulating overconsumption of highly palatable food. This suggests that having a clearer understanding of the role of stress and emotions in the development of obesity will lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Sucrose consumption activates the mesocorticolimbic system in a manner synonymous with substances of abuse. There is overwhelming evidence to support the hypothesis that sucrose consumption results in pathophysiological consequences such as morphological neuronal changes, altered emotional processing and modified behaviour in rodent and human models. In this comprehensive review, we examined >300 studies investigating the interaction between sugar consumption, stress and emotions. Preclinical and clinical trials investigating highly palatable foods and stress, anxiety, depression and fear are reviewed. Importantly, the synergy between sugar consumption and neurobiology is addressed. This review summarizes the neurochemical changes and neural adaptations ö including changes in the dopaminergic system ö that influence emotion and behaviour following sugar consumption.
Brain metastasis is a significant challenge for some breast cancer patients, marked by its aggressive nature, limited treatment options, and poor clinical outcomes. Immunotherapies have emerged as a promising avenue for brain metastasis treatment. B7-H3 (CD276) is an immune checkpoint molecule involved in T cell suppression, which is associated with poor survival in cancer patients. Given the increasing number of clinical trials using B7-H3 targeting CAR T cell therapies, we examined B7-H3 expression across breast cancer subtypes and in breast cancer brain metastases to assess its potential as an interventional target. B7-H3 expression was investigated using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of three clinical cohorts: (i) unselected primary breast cancers (n = 347); (ii) brain metastatic breast cancers (n = 61) and breast cancer brain metastases (n = 80, including a subset of 53 patient-matched breast and brain metastasis cases); and (iii) mixed brain metastases from a range of primary tumours (n = 137). In primary breast cancers, B7-H3 expression significantly correlated with higher tumour grades and aggressive breast cancer subtypes, as well as poorer 5-year survival outcomes. Subcellular localisation of B7-H3 impacted breast cancer-specific survival, with cytoplasmic staining also correlating with a poorer outcome. Its expression was frequently detected in brain metastases from breast cancers, with up to 90% expressing B7-H3. However, not all brain metastases showed high levels of expression, with those from colorectal and renal tumours showing a low frequency of B7-H3 expression (0/14 and 2/16, respectively). The prevalence of B7-H3 expression in breast cancers and breast cancer brain metastases indicates potential opportunities for B7-H3 targeted therapies in breast cancer management.
There is accumulating evidence that an obesogenic Western diet causes neuroinflammatory damage to the brain, which then promotes further appetitive behaviour. Neuroinflammation has been extensively studied by analysing the translocator protein of 18 kDa (TSPO), a protein that is upregulated in the inflamed brain following a damaging stimulus. As a result, there is a rich supply of TSPO-specific agonists, antagonists and positron emission tomography ligands. One TSPO ligand, etifoxine, is also currently used clinically for the treatment of anxiety with a minimal side-effect profile. Despite the neuroinflammatory pathogenesis of diet-induced obesity, and the translational potential of targeting TSPO, there is sparse literature characterizing the effect of TSPO on appetite. Therefore, in this review, the influence of TSPO on appetite is discussed. Three putative mechanisms for TSPO's appetite-modulatory effect are then characterized: the TSPO–allopregnanolone–GABA A R signalling axis, glucosensing in tanycytes and association with the synaptic protein RIM-BP1. We highlight that, in addition to its plethora of functions, TSPO is a regulator of appetite. This review ultimately suggests that the appetite-modulating function of TSPO should be further explored due to its potential therapeutic promise.
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) infants have increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Although both FGR and SGA infants have low birthweights for gestational age, a diagnosis of FGR also requires assessments of umbilical artery Doppler, physiological determinants, neonatal features of malnutrition, and in utero growth retardation. Both FGR and SGA are associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes ranging from learning and behavioral difficulties to cerebral palsy. Up to 50% of FGR, newborns are not diagnosed until around the time of birth, yet this diagnosis lacks further indication of the risk of brain injury or adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Blood biomarkers may be a promising tool. Defining blood biomarkers indicating an infant’s risk of brain injury would provide the opportunity for early detection and therefore earlier support. The aim of this review was to summarize the current literature to assist in guiding the future direction for the early detection of adverse brain outcomes in FGR and SGA neonates. The studies investigated potential diagnostic blood biomarkers from cord and neonatal blood or serum from FGR and SGA human neonates. Results were often conflicting with heterogeneity common in the biomarkers examined, timepoints, gestational age, and definitions of FGR and SGA used. Due to these variations, it was difficult to draw strong conclusions from the results. The search for blood biomarkers of brain injury in FGR and SGA neonates should continue as early detection and intervention is critical to improve outcomes for these neonates.
Precision oncology, also known as personalized oncology or precision medicine, is the tailoring of cancer treatment to individual patients based on the specific genetic, molecular, and other unique characteristics of their tumor. The goal of precision oncology is to optimize the effectiveness of cancer treatment while minimizing toxicities and improving patient outcomes. Precision oncology recognizes that cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and that each patient’s tumor has a distinct genetic diversity. Precision medicine individualizes therapy by using information from a patient’s tumor in the context of clinical history to determine optimal therapeutic approaches and increasing numbers of drugs target specific tumor alterations. Several targeted therapies with approved companion diagnostics are commercially available, the haves of precision oncology, where predictive biomarkers guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes. However, many therapies still lack clear biomarkers, the have nots, posing a challenge to fully realizing the promise of precision oncology. Herein, we describe the current state of the art for breast cancer precision oncology and highlight the therapeutic agents that require a more robust biomarker.
The researchers who conduct, author and review neuroscience studies inherently shape both the findings and the segments of society that ultimately benefit from the research. Generally, Western high-income nations dominate the production and dissemination of the majority of prestigious scientific research. However, the extent of geographic disparities across the neuroscience research pipeline, including at the level of editors, peer reviewers, authors, and research participants, have not been examined. This article synthesizes meta-research studies examining geographic disparities in neuroscience research, supplemented by an analysis of the properties of 2,013 articles published in the top five most prestigious neuroscience journals between 2014 and 2023. Our review demonstrates that editorial boards and authorship of neuroscience research remains concentrated in high-income Western nations, with some evidence to suggest that authors affiliated with non-high-income nations are increasingly represented. There is currently no direct evidence to suggest that authors affiliated with non-high-income countries experience disparities in peer review delays or public engagement with their research. However, our analysis shows that these authors’ works receive fewer citations than their high-income nation-affiliated colleagues’. Further, while very few non-high-income nation-affiliated researchers first-author prestigious neuroscience publications, a relatively greater proportion of these prestigious publications use data from research participants in non-high-income nations. We conclude the review by summarizing current initiatives aimed at reducing geographic disparities in neuroscience research.