N-myc downregulated gene-1 (NDRG1) has been variably reported as a metastasis suppressor, a biomarker of poor outcome, and a facilitator of disease progression in a range of different cancers. NDRG1 is poorly understood in cancer due to its context-dependent and pleiotropic functions. Within breast cancer, NDRG1 is reported to be either a facilitator of, or an inhibitor of tumour progression and metastasis. The wide array of roles played by NDRG1 are dependent on post-translational modifications and subcellular localization, as well as the cellular context, for example, cancer type. We present an update on NDRG1, and its association with hallmarks of cancer such as hypoxia, its interaction with oncogenic proteins such as p53 as well its role in oncogenic and metastasis pathways in breast and other cancers. We further comment on its functional implications as a metastasis suppressor and promoter, its clinical relevance, and discuss its therapeutic targetability in different cancers.

Brain metastasis is a significant challenge for some breast cancer patients, marked by its aggressive nature, limited treatment options, and poor clinical outcomes. Immunotherapies have emerged as a promising avenue for brain metastasis treatment. B7-H3 (CD276) is an immune checkpoint molecule involved in T cell suppression, which is associated with poor survival in cancer patients. Given the increasing number of clinical trials using B7-H3 targeting CAR T cell therapies, we examined B7-H3 expression across breast cancer subtypes and in breast cancer brain metastases to assess its potential as an interventional target. B7-H3 expression was investigated using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of three clinical cohorts: (i) unselected primary breast cancers (n = 347); (ii) brain metastatic breast cancers (n = 61) and breast cancer brain metastases (n = 80, including a subset of 53 patient-matched breast and brain metastasis cases); and (iii) mixed brain metastases from a range of primary tumours (n = 137). In primary breast cancers, B7-H3 expression significantly correlated with higher tumour grades and aggressive breast cancer subtypes, as well as poorer 5-year survival outcomes. Subcellular localisation of B7-H3 impacted breast cancer-specific survival, with cytoplasmic staining also correlating with a poorer outcome. Its expression was frequently detected in brain metastases from breast cancers, with up to 90% expressing B7-H3. However, not all brain metastases showed high levels of expression, with those from colorectal and renal tumours showing a low frequency of B7-H3 expression (0/14 and 2/16, respectively). The prevalence of B7-H3 expression in breast cancers and breast cancer brain metastases indicates potential opportunities for B7-H3 targeted therapies in breast cancer management.

Brain metastases are secondary brain tumours characterised by their aggressive nature and poor prognosis. Breast cancer is one of the most common primary tumours in women to spread to the brain. A lack of biomarkers predicting likely spread to the brain and limited therapeutic interventions represents major areas of clinical unmet need. We investigated N‐myc downregulated gene‐1 (NDRG1) as a clinically relevant biomarker in breast cancer brain metastasis patients. NDRG1 expression was investigated using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of two clinical cohorts: (i) brain metastatic breast cancers (n = 48) and brain metastases (n = 64; including a subset of 39 patient‐matched breast and brain metastasis cases) and (ii) unselected primary breast cancers (n = 336). NDRG1 was highly expressed in breast‐to‐brain metastases, as well as in high‐grade primary breast cancers. High NDRG1 expression and also an absence of expression were associated with worse survival outcomes in both breast cancer and breast cancer brain metastasis patients. This establishes NDRG1 as a ‘Goldilocks’ protein, where too much or too little has a negative effect on survival. We pose that this accounts for its previous categorisation as both tumour suppressor and oncoprotein. Additionally, a shift in NDRG1 localisation with a gain of nuclear expression was seen at the brain metastasis stage. Significant survival benefit in cases expressing cytoplasmic NDRG1 was observed, whereas NDRG1 localisation in the nucleus showed a clear association with poorer survival. In vitro analyses revealed that hypoxic stress significantly elevated NDRG1 expression and resulted in its nuclear localisation. Our findings suggest NDRG1 expression and subcellular localisation are clinically relevant biomarkers for poor prognosis in breast cancer and breast cancer brain metastasis.

Primary malignancies of the lung, skin (melanoma), and breast have higher propensity for metastatic spread to the brain. Advances in molecular tumour profiling have aided the development of targeted therapies, stereotactic radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, which have led to some improvement in patient outcomes; however, the overall prognosis remains poor. Continued research to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers is necessary to further impact patient outcomes, as this will enable better risk stratification at the point of primary cancer diagnosis, earlier detection of metastatic deposits (for example, through surveillance), and more effective systemic treatments. Brain metastases exhibit considerable inter- and intratumoural heterogeneity—apart from distinct histology, treatment history and other clinical factors, the metastatic brain tumour microenvironment is incredibly variable both in terms of subclonal diversity and cellular composition. This review discusses emerging biomarkers; specifically, the biological context and potential clinical utility of tumour tissue biomarkers, circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumour DNA.

Aims: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) may show targetable vulnerabilities secondary to the characteristic loss of the cell adhesion protein E‐cadherin. Specifically, a synthetic lethal interaction was identified between E‐cadherin loss and ROS1 inhibition. Several clinical trials are currently under way to assess the efficacy of ROS1 inhibitors in ILC; however, ROS1 expression has not been confirmed in ILC tumours and ROS1 has not been validated as a biomarker in the breast cancer setting. This study aimed to (i) examine ROS1 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer cases and (ii) investigate the biology and clinical significance of ROS1 positivity in breast cancer.Methods and results: ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed on a large cohort of ILC (n = 274) and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST; n = 431) cases with extensive clinicopathological data. The staining performance of four ROS1 antibody clones was compared. There was marked variation in ROS1 status according to antibody clone. D4D6 and SP384 were negative in almost all breast cancer cases, whereas EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in 37 and 47% of ILC cases, and 49 and 74% of NST cases, respectively. Only data from clones D4D6 and SP384 were highly concordant, while EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in distinct breast cancer subtypes.Conclusions: Assessment of ROS1 status in breast cancer appears to be highly antibody clone‐dependent. ROS1 antibody clone selection will be an important consideration in the design of clinical trials investigating the clinical validity of ROS1 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer.

The University of Queensland's institutional repository, UQ eSpace, aims to create global visibility and accessibility of UQ’s scholarly research.