There are no investigations about the outcomes of idiopathic PVC catheter ablation (CA) in athletes compared to the sedentary population. We conducted a prospective single-centre observational study. The primary and secondary procedural outcomes were the post-ablation reduction of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in an athletes vs. non-athletes group and in agonist vs. leisure-time athletes. The third was the evaluation of the resumption of physical activity and the improvement of symptoms in agonist and leisure-time athletes. From January 2020 to October 2022 we enrolled 79 patients with RVOT/LVOT/fascicular PVC presumed origin. The median percentage of decrease between the pre-procedure and post-procedure Holter monitoring in the non-athletes group was 96 (IQR 68–98) and 98 in the athletes group (IQR 92–99) (p = 0.08). Considering the athletes, the median percentage of decrease in the number of PVCs was 98 (IQR 93–99) and 98 (IQR 87–99), respectively, in leisure-time and agonistic athletes (p = 0.42). Sixteen (70%) leisure time and seventeen (90%) agonist athletes (p = 0.24) have resumed physical activity 3 months after PVC CA; among agonistic athletes, 59% have resumed competitive physical activity. Many leisure-time (88%) and agonist (70%) athletes experienced an improvement in symptoms after ablation. PVC CA was effective and safe in both groups, reducing symptoms and allowing a quick and safe return to sports activities in athletes.

Background: Pulsed Field ablation (PFA) has recently emerged as a treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and early studies showed promising procedural data and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, Very High-Power Short-Duration ablation (VHPSD) has previously reported good efficiency and mid-term outcomes, and only a few works compared these two procedures, especially in patients with persistent AF. Objective: Our aim is to compare these different modalities of transcatheter ablation in patients with persistent AF, focusing mainly on some procedural aspects, safety and efficacy. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study enrolling all consecutive patients with persistent AF from September 2021 to May 2023 undergoing transcatheter ablation with PFA or VHPSD. In the first group, PVI was achieved by 2kV pulses with eight applications to each vein using both catheter configurations, while isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium was achieved by applications through the only "flower" configuration; additional lesions were then added at the operator's discretion. In the second group, PVI was achieved by delivering 90W radiofrequency pulses for 4 seconds in the posterior portions of the left atrium and 50W pulses in the anterior region of the pulmonary veins; additional lesions were occasionally applied. All patients received general anaesthesia or deep sedation with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine. Results: A total of 79 patients were included, n = 24 (30%) in the PFA group and N = 55 (70%) in the VHPSD one: early persistent AF (n= 2 [8,3%]; N = 7 [12,7%]), persistent AF (n= 17 [70,8%]; N = 36 [65,5%]), long-standing persistent AF (n= 5 [20,8%]; N = 12 [21,8%]). The two populations showed similar clinical features: CHA2DS2-VASc (median value 3 [0-6] in PFA vs 2 [0-6] in VHPSD, p = 0,10), indexed left atrial volume (mean value 42,6 ml/m² in PFA vs 42,4 ml/m² in VHPSD, p = 0,07) and EF (mean value 55,4% in PFA vs 54,8% in VHPSD, p = 0,33). PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. Nevertheless, the PFA group was associated with shorter procedural duration (92,1 ± 36,9 vs 134,2 ± 36,1 minutes, p = 0,00001) but longer fluoroscopy time (25,5 ± 9,3 vs 17,4 ± 11,5 minutes, p = 0,001); it also showed a lower rate of minor complications (n = 1 [4,2%] vs N = 3 [5,5%], p = 0,057), even though serious complications were not observed in either group. After a median follow-up of 14 (9-26) months, n = 19 [79.2%] in the PFA and N = 43 [78.2%] in the VHPSD population were free of any atrial arrhythmia (p = 0,92). Conclusion: PFA allows faster procedures, representing a major advantage for the operator and the patient, who is at lower risk of peri-procedural complications. On the other hand, VHPSD correlates with shorter fluoroscopy times, reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. Finally, the two procedures show similar mid-term efficacy in terms of recurrence-free time.

There are no investigations about the outcomes of idiopathic PVCs catheter ablation (CA) in athletes compared to sedentary population. We conducted a prospective single-centre observational study. The primary and secondary procedural outcomes were premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) post-ablation reduction in athletes vs. non-athletes group and in agonist vs. leisure-time athletes. The third was the evaluation of the resumption of physical activity and the improvement of symptoms in agonist and leisure-time athletes. From January 2020 to October 2022 we enrolled 79 patients with RVOT/LVOT/fascicular PVC presumed origin. The median percentage of decrease between the pre-procedure and post-procedure Holter monitoring in non-athletes group was 96 (IQR 68 – 98) and 98 in athletes group (IQR 92 – 99) (p=0,08). Considering the athletes, the median percentage of decrease in PVCs number was 98 (IQR 93-99) and 98 (IQR 87-99) respectively in leisure-time and agonistic athletes (p=0,42). Sixteen (70%) leisure time and 17 (90%) agonist athletes (p=0,24) have resumed physical activity 3 months after PVCs CA; among agonistic athletes, 59% have resumed competitive physical activity. Much of leisure-time (88%) and agonist (70%) athletes experienced an improvement in symptoms after ablation. PVC CA was effective and safe in both groups, reducing symptoms and allowing a quick and safe return to sports activities in athletes.

Background: The newly introduced non-thermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with high acute success rates and good safety features. However studies have shown that very high power short duration (VHPSD) ablation is also highly effective and fast with potentially less arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Data comparing this two methods are lacking Objective: The aim of this study is to compare two source of energy used for CA of AF in terms of procedural, clinical and outcome data Methods: We conduced a retrospective observational study enrolling all patients (pts) from september 2021 to may 2023 who underwent CA of AF with PFA system and VHPSD. In the PFA group pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) was obtained using 2KV with eight application each vein, posterior wall isolation (PWI) of left atrium (LA) was obtained with application in the flower configuration of the catheter and then additional lesion were deployed at the operator’s discretion. In the VHPSD group the encircling of PV was obtained with 90W for 4 seconds radiofrequency pulses in posterior portions of the LA including LA PW, whereas 50W with ablation index target of 500 was used in the anterior portions of the PV and additional lesions. General anesthesia or deep sedation was carried out in all pts Results: A total of 205 pts were included, n = 86 (42%) in the PFA group and N = 119 (58%) in the VHPSD group: paroxysmal (n = 62[72%], N = 64[54%]), persistent (n = 19[22%], N = 43[36%]), long standing persistent (n = 5[5%], N = 10[8%]). PVI was successful in all pts and additional lesions were delivered in n = 26 (30%) in PFA group and N = 76 (64%) in HVPSD group, mostly at the PW (n = 24[92%]; N = 50[66%]). The PFA group revealed a shorter procedura duration (80 ± 29 min vs 108 ± 39 min; p = 0,00001) but longer fluoroscopic time (21 ± 8 min vs 14 ± 10 min; p = 0,00001). The VHPSD group revealed more complications (N = 7[6%] vs n = 3[3%]) but without statistically significant difference (p = 0,43), the most frequent in the PFA group was vascular access complications instead in the VHPSD group was post-procedural pericarditis. Only one patient in VHPSD group had major complication with a post-procedural stroke but without residual neurological deficits. At follow-up after median of 14 (26-6) months, n = 61 pts in the PFA group (71%) and N = 91 in the VHPSD group (76%) were free from atrial arrhythmia (p = 0,79). In both group 7 pts recurrenced as atypical atrial flutter (n = 7[28%] PFA; N = 7[25%] VHPSD; p = 0,061) Conclusion: PFA and VHPSD are effective and safe to CA of AF with comparable arrhythmia recurrenses. However procedure duration with PFA is significantly shorter and therefore may be of potential benefit in particular for elderly and frail pts. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to validate and compare these techniques more comprehensively

Background/Objectives: Electroanatomic mapping (EAM) provides high-resolution spatial and electrogram information, but the prognostic utility of quantitative EAM features has not been systematically evaluated with contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) methods. We investigated whether an AI analysis of quantitative EAM exports from the CARTO system enhances the prediction of major arrhythmic events (MAEs). Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 248 consecutive patients undergoing left ventricular EAM at four tertiary electrophysiology centers were analyzed. Numerical EAM descriptors (spatial coordinates, unipolar/bipolar voltages, local activation time, impedance) were transformed into derived metrics, including local activation heterogeneity (GR), late-potential extent (LAT), bipolar–unipolar discrepancy (VLT), and low-amplitude scar extent (Scar Areas), and were spatially normalized via spherical projection. Clinical, anamnestic, and imaging variables were integrated. Machine learning and deep learning models were trained with an 80:20 train/test split and evaluated using three-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Results: Models incorporating both clinical and AI-processed EAM features achieved high discriminatory performance (test AUC up to 0.92; accuracy up to 0.896). Specificity was consistently high (≈0.97–0.998), whereas sensitivity remained modest (≈0.39–0.58). Among the EAM-derived features, GR was the most consistently informative predictor across algorithms and analyses; VLT, LAT, and Scar Areas also contributed substantially. Regionally, basal sub-mitral, subaortic, and posterolateral basal-to-mid zones exhibited the strongest associations with MAEs. Conclusions: AI-driven quantitative analysis of left ventricular EAM exports augments risk stratification for MAEs beyond conventional clinical and binary EAM descriptors. Reflecting local conduction heterogeneity, GR emerged as the dominant EAM predictor. Prospective validation in larger, disease-specific cohorts and real-time integration within EAM platforms are warranted.